Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:49 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The funny thing about Sheedy is that every Essendon* supporter I know reckons he needs to be put out to pasture. The media love everything he has to say though.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
And another thing, I thought free to air/sponsership was why we moved to Telstra Dome. Shouldn't have to worry about these things anymore apparantely. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Its not what we want its what the sponsors want....the AFL have sold the game to Televison...its about getting the logo on the box for you me and anyone else to see and in prime time.
Membership will become less important over the years and sponsorship more important as the TV side of thing kicks in more...sponsors dont just want members money they want everyones money....the AFL's the winner....hopefully as the TV rights get bigger the clubs slice of the cake does as well however AndyD when questioned on where the money would go was more interested in the AFL aquiring assets than sharing it out..

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:44 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21652
Location: North of the border
Wojee wrote:
The funny thing about Sheedy is that every Essendon* supporter I know reckons he needs to be put out to pasture. The media love everything he has to say though.


Yeh I know what you mean - there is another bloke like that his name just slips my mind

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
Membership will become less important over the years and sponsorship more important as the TV side of thing kicks in more.....


Big call that Elwood. Hope your wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Sydney Blue wrote:
Wojee wrote:
The funny thing about Sheedy is that every Essendon* supporter I know reckons he needs to be put out to pasture. The media love everything he has to say though.


Yeh I know what you mean - there is another bloke like that his name just slips my mind


Sydney Blue?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35991
Location: Half back flank
I was thinking Courtney Johns...

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
He's talking about mini-bus.....no he's not, but I am. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:42 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Would anyone accept selling home games to avoid accessing the Competitive balance fund :?:


I've said it before. We should play a home game in Sydney (Telstra Stadium), Adelaide (Adelaide Oval) and the Gold Coast. Let's be an Australian sporting club instead of being a Victorian sporting club.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:57 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:59 am
Posts: 173
Gerry I appreciate all the things you were saying..I just can't help but look at a team like the Bulldogs..limited success..crappy brand...low membership base and yet they have been able to attract a sponsor...sure the AFL props them up but surely that is an additional reason for sponsors to steer clear but they don't...doesn't make sense to me...someone or something has to be accountable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
budzy wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Would anyone accept selling home games to avoid accessing the Competitive balance fund :?:


I've said it before. We should play a home game in Sydney (Telstra Stadium), Adelaide (Adelaide Oval) and the Gold Coast. Let's be an Australian sporting club instead of being a Victorian sporting club.


Adelaide H (Adel.Oval)
Brisbane H (Carrara)
Collingwood H (MCG) A (MCG)
Essendon* H (MCG) A (MCG)
Fremantle A (Subiaco)
Geelong H (TD) A (KP)
Hawthorn H (TD) A (MCG)
Melbourne H (TD) A (MCG)
North Melbourne H (TD) A (MCG)
Port Adelaide A (AMMI)
Richmond H (TD)
StKilda A (TD)
Sydney H (Telstra St.) A (SCG)
Westcoast H (TD)
Western Bulldogs A (TD)

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2143
budzy wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Would anyone accept selling home games to avoid accessing the Competitive balance fund :?:


I've said it before. We should play a home game in Sydney (Telstra Stadium), Adelaide (Adelaide Oval) and the Gold Coast. Let's be an Australian sporting club instead of being a Victorian sporting club.


Don't agree with you on this one Budzy (normally i do agree)

- once you up up and move you are no longer part of where you are from.

This is the american answer to everything ... i don't believe in following the nba/ nfl model with selling your soul for the almighty dollar. They call their
clubs franchises -they don't call them clubs.


the LA Dodgers were the brooklyn dodgers and soon they will be the san jose dodgers and then the alabama dodgers.


carlton is a club with a heritage. many people support carlton from afar - and just cause you live in brisbane doesn't mean you have to support the lions. once you start playing HOME games in other states - what are you?

the adelaide oval blues?

the carlton blues?

the carlton/western sydney suburbs blues?



no. big soccer clubs such as manchester united have more supporters outside manchester than it.. but their home games are still played at manchester. if we build a club with enough heritage and culture people come to you - not the other way around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I see where you are coming from kerna.The lack of sponsorship is hard to take. I guess we are really on the nose at present but hopefully we will take a few steps forward over this coming season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
tap in 79 wrote:
budzy wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Would anyone accept selling home games to avoid accessing the Competitive balance fund :?:


I've said it before. We should play a home game in Sydney (Telstra Stadium), Adelaide (Adelaide Oval) and the Gold Coast. Let's be an Australian sporting club instead of being a Victorian sporting club.


Don't agree with you on this one Budzy (normally i do agree)

- once you up up and move you are no longer part of where you are from.

This is the american answer to everything ... i don't believe in following the nba/ nfl model with selling your soul for the almighty dollar. They call their
clubs franchises -they don't call them clubs.


the LA Dodgers were the brooklyn dodgers and soon they will be the san jose dodgers and then the alabama dodgers.


carlton is a club with a heritage. many people support carlton from afar - and just cause you live in brisbane doesn't mean you have to support the lions. once you start playing HOME games in other states - what are you?

the adelaide oval blues?

the carlton blues?

the carlton/western sydney suburbs blues?



no. big soccer clubs such as manchester united have more supporters outside manchester than it.. but their home games are still played at manchester. if we build a club with enough heritage and culture people come to you - not the other way around.

I'm worried about the potential backlash from the members who might not sign up with the shift from Princes Park still ringing in their ears. But if some Bluesfans are so upset at accessing the CBF, why shouldn't we consider selling 1 or 2 home games against the interstate sides?

I don't hear Hawthorn or St Kilda fans saying they've lost their identity, because they realise the benefits outweigh the negatives. If the side isn't going to attract any new sponsors and lose money on some games, it would be a wise short term decision to take the cash for selling 1 or 2 games.

Beggars can't be choosers and that's what we are till we get back on top. But our board and fans may think the sponsors are going to come running because we just have exposure in the one state.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:53 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
tap in 79 wrote:
budzy wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Would anyone accept selling home games to avoid accessing the Competitive balance fund :?:


I've said it before. We should play a home game in Sydney (Telstra Stadium), Adelaide (Adelaide Oval) and the Gold Coast. Let's be an Australian sporting club instead of being a Victorian sporting club.


- once you up up and move you are no longer part of where you are from.

We upped and moved games from Princes Park but we are still CFC the mighty blues.

tap in 79 wrote:
This is the american answer to everything ... i don't believe in following the nba/ nfl model with selling your soul for the almighty dollar.

Again, we've already sold our souls when we stopped playing games at Princes Park. Too late to get all tempremental now.
WE MUST GROW OUR MEMBERSHIP BASE!!!

tap in 79 wrote:
the LA Dodgers were the brooklyn dodgers and soon they will be the san jose dodgers and then the alabama dodgers.

carlton is a club with a heritage. many people support carlton from afar - and just cause you live in brisbane doesn't mean you have to support the lions. once you start playing HOME games in other states - what are you?
the adelaide oval blues?
the carlton blues?
the carlton/western sydney suburbs blues?

I hope we will always be the Carlton Football Club (the mighty blues) based at Princes Park Carlton and supported and watched by members Australia wide.

btw, my proposed draw above only has us playing 6 games interstate (only one more than this year) so Vic fans only miss out on one more game to watch live. A small price to pay for a pretty big dividend maybe don't you think.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
I was just scanning the Herald Sun webpage and I noticed they don't have any reports on Carlton's financial troubles? :?

Is the biggest paper in the country more concerned with the fact Cooney has one leg longer than the other? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
JuzzCarlton wrote:
I was just scanning the Herald Sun webpage and I noticed they don't have any reports on Carlton's financial troubles? :?

Is the biggest paper in the country more concerned with the fact Cooney has one leg longer than the other? :roll:


The paper version had a Mike Sheehan article about the situation today.


Edit to add: Its actually on the web site:

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,%255E20123,00.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
My bad. :oops:

Was that the first article they've written on it?

I wonder what the critics think of this comment.
Quote:
Recently retired board member and premiership player David McKay was scathing in his assessment of the Elliott years on SEN radio yesterday.

"We inherited the debt of the Legends Stand, plus the salary cap penalty, plus the draft penalties," he said.

"The club was left in an absolute . . . a hole bigger than the Grand Canyon when the former administration left (three years ago)Elliott said benefactors, such as Dick Pratt and Sam Smorgon, "don't have any confidence in the current board".

Not for the first time in recent years, McKay led the rebuttal.

"There's no point in giving anything that John said any credibility because it's rubbish," he said.

It was McKay who said Carlton had $4 million in the bank when Collins left the club as general manager to join the AFL. Sources close to Collins say he puts the figure at $6 million. Whatever the precise amount, there has been a turnaround of more than $10 million since 1994.


I don't think we could have turned around the financial situation in 3 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7460
http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=247699

Carlton has strongly denied reports that it has resolved to approach the AFL to seek $1 million in special assistance from the AFL.

The club released a statement on Saturday dismissing the reports as 'totally false'.


"It is the case that in 2005 the Board of the Carlton Football Club approved the club’s entry into discussions with the AFL to explore a range of possible financial alternatives to improve the financial position of the club," the statement said.

Among these were the redevelopment of Princes Park and an AFL contribution to assist.

In the statement, the Blues said that the future of the club remained bright, pending a 'complete restructure' of the Carlton Social Club arrangements and a successful outcome to the discussions with the AFL.

Meanwhile, Carlton's family day, set down for Princes Park on Sunday, has been cancelled due to the heavy rain in Melbourne on Saturday afternoon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:54 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:59 am
Posts: 547
Location: Urban Wasteland
Well my 2c on the subject after lurking for long enough.

I just don't see the issue....after all we're just getting our money back which I'm all for :-)

I pointed this out to a wanker St Kilda supporter giving me crap yesterday. When I highlighted the fact that the money we'd get from the AFL was MORE than the fine and that we'd actually be in front he was mighty shity about that.

Really made me feel good. The only downer in this deal is the loss of the draft picks. How we could have done with Daniel Wells against Geelong.

_________________
The great are great to us only because we are on our knees. Let us arise.
--Robert Collier


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BluesRockMyWorld, Google [Bot], Meekster and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group