Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 10:46 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2026 11:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26764
Location: Bondi Beach
JK wrote:
If we continue getting the balance in our game right and our new batch of assistants show overall improvement in game style across the year, I’m not convinced a new coach is the panacea we all think it is if the arrow is pointing upwards. If the players completely throw it in as the year progresses then clearly a different story, I’m just not convinced they will.


I like Josh's post. I share similar thoughts.

We have not had a settled side since 2022.

When we did have a settled side, way back in the 2nd half of 2023, when perennially injured players, Martin, Cuningham, Williams, Gov, Marchbank all came back into the team, we won 10/11 games. Like them, we ran out of petrol tickets in the PF.

Our injury list started with 13 out in round zero. A couple weeks back we got it down to 5, and hovers around 7. We need players learning to play together under the same game plan, and that familiarity will enable them to be onfield coaches adjusting positioning to support the Game Plan. I'm only guessing, but there's evidence a settled team is a winning team.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:10 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 8437
JK wrote:
If we continue getting the balance in our game right and our new batch of assistants show overall improvement in game style across the year, I’m not convinced a new coach is the panacea we all think it is if the arrow is pointing upwards. If the players completely throw it in as the year progresses then clearly a different story, I’m just not convinced they will.

That's the near miracle I'm hopin' for Josh .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: If not Voss, then who ?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20711
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2026 8:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 8437
bluehammer wrote:
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.


Yeah Hammer , that's why I'm saying near miracle . Lotta stuff to sort out .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2026 11:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26764
Location: Bondi Beach
bluehammer wrote:
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.


Match winning weapons have won games against us off their own boot....Heeney, Gulden, Pickett, Gawn, Wardlaw, LDU, Rachelle, Rankine, Naicos, Bolton Jackson...do we have players who are like them? Would we have won if we had a couple players like them?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2026 12:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7921
bondiblue wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.


Match winning weapons have won games against us off their own boot....Heeney, Gulden, Pickett, Gawn, Wardlaw, LDU, Rachelle, Rankine, Naicos, Bolton Jackson...do we have players who are like them? Would we have won if we had a couple players like them?

Yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2026 3:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26764
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.


Match winning weapons have won games against us off their own boot....Heeney, Gulden, Pickett, Gawn, Wardlaw, LDU, Rachelle, Rankine, Naicos, Bolton Jackson...do we have players who are like them? Would we have won if we had a couple players like them?

Yes.


I think so.

We are a few players short to be a Finals team.
We can make that up at the end of the this year, and another top up end of 2027.

I hope Austin has some BIG targets lined up, or else.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2026 4:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20711
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
I like the sentiment too but the improvement in game style?

I don't see it at all. Yeah we're competitive but we lack any of the weapons - underdeveloped or not - to trouble strong sides.

Mental fragility is our biggest weakness. Kicking is a close second.


Match winning weapons have won games against us off their own boot....Heeney, Gulden, Pickett, Gawn, Wardlaw, LDU, Rachelle, Rankine, Naicos, Bolton Jackson...do we have players who are like them? Would we have won if we had a couple players like them?

Yes.
Perhaps in the early season. By now they'd all be carltonised and shit.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 5:34 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7924
a piece of toast with marmite on it, could coach us at this point.


team meetings, sitting in our little auditorium at ikon. everyone staring at the piece of toast with serious looks on their faces, nodding in agreement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 7:27 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 19777
Location: threeohfivethree
Marmite would be a little too strong for this mob.

I think they’d go to butter.

We are toast.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 8:28 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6701
This club has been a disaster for 25 years
I repeat 25 years
Change coach no change
Change List Manager no change
Change CEO no change
Change head of football no change

What’s the common denominator
The Board and yet dummies on here still don’t understand
These people who sit in that room when there time expires they bring in someone new cut from the same cloth
The lack of leadership Priestley has shown in the last 2 weeks is sickening
The board chose Voss
The board ultimately has the final say on who assists him
When Voss is sacked he will become scapegoat number whatever in a long line of scapegoats that takes away the focus of the actual problem
New coach won’t change anything
Rinse and repeat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 9:05 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:40 pm
Posts: 923
its time


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 9:58 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11302
keogh wrote:
This club has been a disaster for 25 years
I repeat 25 years
Change coach no change
Change List Manager no change
Change CEO no change
Change head of football no change

What’s the common denominator
The Board and yet dummies on here still don’t understand
These people who sit in that room when there time expires they bring in someone new cut from the same cloth
The lack of leadership Priestley has shown in the last 2 weeks is sickening
The board chose Voss
The board ultimately has the final say on who assists him
When Voss is sacked he will become scapegoat number whatever in a long line of scapegoats that takes away the focus of the actual problem
New coach won’t change anything
Rinse and repeat


I do agree with you, and deep down, do believe we need an overhaul of the board, but we've also just hired a new CEO and Head of Football. New hires Within 12 months. My questions would be directed to them.

Why did GW keep Voss on for another year? What was the reasoning? Losing talent because of such a decision needs to have some accountability. From the outside looking in - bad decision. Not a good start.
Has CD identified the football department issue(s) and what is the plan moving forward?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2026 10:13 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6701
SurreyBlue wrote:
keogh wrote:
This club has been a disaster for 25 years
I repeat 25 years
Change coach no change
Change List Manager no change
Change CEO no change
Change head of football no change

What’s the common denominator
The Board and yet dummies on here still don’t understand
These people who sit in that room when there time expires they bring in someone new cut from the same cloth
The lack of leadership Priestley has shown in the last 2 weeks is sickening
The board chose Voss
The board ultimately has the final say on who assists him
When Voss is sacked he will become scapegoat number whatever in a long line of scapegoats that takes away the focus of the actual problem
New coach won’t change anything
Rinse and repeat


I do agree with you, and deep down, do believe we need an overhaul of the board, but we've also just hired a new CEO and Head of Football. New hires Within 12 months. My questions would be directed to them.

Why did GW keep Voss on for another year? What was the reasoning? Losing talent because of such a decision needs to have some accountability. From the outside looking in - bad decision. Not a good start.
Has CD identified the football department issue(s) and what is the plan moving forward?

GW wanted him gone but the board didn’t want egg on their face and sack him before his contract was up unlike the plethora of of previous sacked coaches
This shit show might on all year


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, MPH78 and 164 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group