Dukes wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Dukes wrote:
In 1991 - Parkin led a big turn-over of players ... and from that point on insisted on recruiting guys of good work ethic and the result ... the 1995 premiership.
When Brittain took over he wanted work ethic over every other possible skill set suitable for AFL and the result ... the 2002 wooden spoon.
We recruited some recycled duds like Athorn, Powell, Sholl in the lead up to the 95 flag - but we also recruited some great recycles like, Rice, Clape, Pearce and dare I say Manton, who proved great acquisitions. In fact with a bit of luck with injury I reckon we were unlucky not to win 3 flags in a row ie. 94/95/96 - I count 93 as a bit of an aberation as I am not sure how we even made the Grand Final with players like Athorn, Powell and Sholl in the side.

This is the reason why I don't agree with the current thinking of you must bottom out, finish last for a few years and then charge up the ladder when it's 'your turn'. There is still a place for clever recruiting ... and not just in the 17 and 18 year old age bracket.
Of course, it helps when your side has a backbone of Dean, Silvagni, Kernahan, Bradley and Madden when you start the 'rebuild'!
Yes but the good young players the ones that are going to become the next generation Kernahans, Bradleys, Williams etc are not available in the second tier competitions like the WAFL, VFL, SANFL, most of them come through the Under 18 Competition, clever recruiting is not going to get you these kids only early draft picks will, The talent identification process is far more precise these days.
You wont get any (or hardly any) of these talented 17/18 year old players slipping through to the older age competitions ready for clubs to pluck in the draft at 60 and 70th pick, it just wont happen. Even the reverse is starting to happen where you get clubs recruiting the bottom age 17 year olds late in the draft gambling that they would have been a top 20 pick in the following year - like we have done with Anthony Raso, and the jury is still out on that one.