Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:42 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Josh Kaplan wrote:
8) :o :( :) :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :P

I respect him as the best cricketer Ive ever seen and dont give a stuff what he does in public- I dont idolise anyone.. except myself. :)


i idolise Hadz... where the hell is Hadz???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Make your point Synbad, by all means, but sometimes you need to tone it down a bit okay.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Did i come across as too homo because i told Josh i idolise Hadtz?

If so.. im sorry... :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Josh Kaplan wrote:
8) :o :( :) :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :P

I respect him as the best cricketer Ive ever seen and dont give a stuff what he does in public- I dont idolise anyone.. except myself. :)


I idolise myself too... :wink:

Great reading all this, by the way , better than watching the tennis, these rallies are awesome...

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Synbad wrote:
Did i come across as too homo because i told Josh i idolise Hadtz?

If so.. im sorry... :wink:


Haha, no it wasn't that, you know you push the limit from time to time. ;)

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:56 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Synbad wrote:

Nah id be rapt he would be at Port doing drive bys for cheap kicks.
He wasnt offered the $$$ by the club. Campo told the club he would go to Port unless he was renummerated by us.
Of course he knew Big Jacks ego wouldnt allow that to happen...

Cos you dont care...!!!

I care....


All he wanted was a different number? I thought he liked the number 16?


Last edited by molsey on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:54 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
Synbad wrote:

If you can think of any please let me know...
the Campo kouta thing needing help is bullshit!!!
Stop kidding yourself..!!!
Stop rationalising to yourself.!!!!
Stop being stupid!!!!



How come someone that has a different opinion than you is stupid?

I asked who was the 4th and 5th midfielders (support) at Carlton and your first line is… "Campo, Kouta do need financial help……. Poor Leaders ………. Sucking up the salary cap. Blah Blah…Blah Blah....Blah Blah.".

Relevance to my question???? How does that stop Justin Davies from playing good football?

Do you ever answer any of the questions?

You could just cut and paste your last rant. Might save you some time?

Synbad wrote:
Wiggo Sporn would put up their hand is they wernt too busy chasing Campo and Koutas loose men around the ground as well as keeping an eye on their own.

there has never ever been a midfield with the experience of ours that has been so unnacountable.


If the above is the case. Then why does Denis continue to play them in the middle??? Why doesn’t he put Campo on a half-forward flank? Is Pagan stupid too?? Pull Denis aside the next time you see him and enlighten him on the problems you see at Carlton.

Synbad wrote:
Want Arkemanis to help them out ???

Who is going to help out a couple of blood suckers who can’t perform?????


Kelly, Ablett, Enright, Hunt, Bartel and Chapman don’t seem to have a problem helping Ottens, King and Riccardi.

And as I said I want Davies, Sporn, Wiggins, etc to step up like the young Bulldogs have done in the shadows of their more highly paid senior players. Smith, Johnson, Darcy, West, and Rawlings. (Not saying that any of these have under performed)


Synbad wrote:
Oh yeah... the players who get 50k will pick up the slack.. and when i say SLACK... i mean SLACK!!!!!


That’s fantastic news! Someone going to step up to the challenge like a Shane Tuck and become our next star midfielder. Any names?? Who knows they might be able to claim some of the extra $1.5 mil that will be available in the cap next season.

Just who is going to help fill the 97% of the cap? We could offer Marc Murphy 500k over 4 years? Or give Clarke a five year deal for $3.5m

Synbad: Tip for you. (Make your life easier)

Ctrl + C
Ctrl + V

End Rant.

And remember kids. If someone earns more than you and is underperforming. Don't step and try and take their place! Underperform aswell! :wink:

_________________
Working alone. At the coalface. Scott's gone for lunch! Said he would be back in 30 mins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:09 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
You're a better man than me Shakin. I can no longer get through the first sentence of a lot of posts. I have often wondered if a psychiatric assessment would help some with the obvious problems they have. But I guess choice is a great thing about life, just like I have chosen, despite numerous opportunities, never to read Mein Kampf because I'm not at all interested in the ravings of a lunatic. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
Josh Kaplan wrote:
What a disgraceful, shithouse argument Clem and Synbad. He's being paid such high rates because the old board decided to pay him that kind of money- this doesnt mean we should put pressure on him to perform in accordance with his wage.

Yes its been said thousands of times before, but if you could get paid upwards of 500K a year and your employer was willing to pay you that kind of money, you take it.
You work your ass off during the Pre and regular season to play to what you're getting paid, often inherent talent doesnt let you do so. But the guy is getting pillared every week by bigger men with more meat on their bones.


You're spot on there Josh.
If I was getting paid top money and delivering average results, I would be working my arse off.
I would be first on the track and last off.
I'd be taking the youngsters aside and assisting them with whatever I can, whether it be skills training, extra running etc.
I'd be blocking for Stevens and Kouta and Walker and anyone else so they can get free.
I'd be leading tackles, smothers shepherds, screens....every one percenter there is.
And I'd concentrate on the second and third efforts instead of playing for frees and arguing with umpires.
I'd set the standard so the up and coming players know exactly whats required to drag our team up.

Remind me which of our players does that.
Probably Bowyer, Johnson, Wiggins, Thornton?
What does that tell you about our senior players.

BTW, players dont get huge money because the old board decide to offer it.
A negotiation process actually takes place.
The player and/or manager negotiate a figure.
They tell the club what they are offering eg. skill, ability, leadership etc and a figure is agreed upon.
They dont wake up one morning with 500k in their bank account for no apparent reason.

The players share responsibility as well.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Anyone interested in hearing the entire interview with Denis Pagan can get it at the CFC website:

http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... &spg=radio




_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
No thanks.

The arguing here is far more interesting.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Synbad wrote:
Campo Kouta do need financial help because there is never going to be enough money to look after these guys.
If they need help and all they care about was footy and not dollars.. they would take a pay cut and we can afford to bring in more quality players.


Synbad you know my view on Campo. But if Campo and Kouta are asked to take a cut so should Pagan as l wrote 2 weeks ago and was bagged. Pagan's drop of say $100k-$120k can bring in one part time and one full time assistant to focus on developing our kids.

In addition Stevo's output has been poor this year - he has to refund the club. In fact all the flowers have to refund the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:46 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Quote:
You're spot on there Josh.
If I was getting paid top money and delivering average results, I would be working my arse off.
I would be first on the track and last off.
I'd be taking the youngsters aside and assisting them with whatever I can, whether it be skills training, extra running etc.
I'd be blocking for Stevens and Kouta and Walker and anyone else so they can get free.
I'd be leading tackles, smothers shepherds, screens....every one percenter there is.
And I'd concentrate on the second and third efforts instead of playing for frees and arguing with umpires.
I'd set the standard so the up and coming players know exactly whats required to drag our team up.

Remind me which of our players does that.
Probably Bowyer, Johnson, Wiggins, Thornton?
What does that tell you about our senior players.

BTW, players dont get huge money because the old board decide to offer it.
A negotiation process actually takes place.
The player and/or manager negotiate a figure.
They tell the club what they are offering eg. skill, ability, leadership etc and a figure is agreed upon.
They dont wake up one morning with 500k in their bank account for no apparent reason.

The players share responsibility as well.

None of you answered my questions before. Particulalry number 5. Why cant we compare Campo of 2005 to a MIDFIELDER of the time on SIMILIAR dollars. Thats why I mentioned Bickley, Cousins etc who were on similiar dollars but also playing at a similiar level.
As I said, NEXT year will indicate the way we should measure Campo in terms of dollars v output.

Additionally, even non Carlton supporters can see a change in Campo's game from a free running midfielder to one who concentrates on tackles (which he lead the club in last year and is up there again this year) and other 1%ers. I dont want to get into a statistical argument because we all know how they can be manipulated, but that is a pretty fair illustration of how his game style has changed.

You're other point about encouraging the younger group on and off the field leaves a lot to be desired. First of all, speaking to a few younger players first hand, they all glow in their praise of Campo as someone they can relate to. He has been particularly helpful of Russel and Hartlett, and made an informal offer for them to live with him before they found their own residence.

Secondly, you guys seriously underestimate the intelligience of younger players. Whilst I dont dispute they look up to some of the senior players for guidance (where Campo has ably assisted) it is about time the 20-21 year olds started taking it upon themselves to set their own example. This is what turns average teams into good teams, and unfortunately our 5th year players cant even compare to those of Geelong, St Kilda etc. This isnt a leadership issue, but a mindset issue amongst the players themselves that needs to be seriously arrested.

They need to discover within themselves reasons why they arent playing up to their full potential. Blaming Campo for their poor form is a significant cop out, one that doesnt address the problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:54 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
I have no idea why Synbad keep demanding that Campo et al take a paycut. They already have and Kouta has taken two. Whits was the first to put his hand up a couple of years ago when Collo asked the playing group to take a cut, the rest followed suit. It is on public record but Synbad keeps saying that they didn't. IIRC the contracts where extended a year for the same amount that was to be paid over the shorter term. It is why I find it staggering that they keep gtting accused of being greedy and selfish. If the players had enforced thier orginal contracts ( as they had the right to, but didn't) we would have been stuffed financially and salary cap wise.

Wierd world some live in.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Additionally, even non Carlton supporters can see a change in Campo's game from a free running midfielder to one who concentrates on tackles (which he lead the club in last year and is up there again this year) and other 1%ers. I dont want to get into a statistical argument because we all know how they can be manipulated,


Concentrates on tackles?
I'd suggest you dont want to get into a statistical argument because you are wrong Josh?
Up there again this year?
Campo averages 3.75 tackles per game.
12 Carlton players average more.

As a matter of fact, during the terms of this contract, Campo has been in our top 10 once for average tackles per game. :?

"Additionally, even non Carlton supporters can see a change in Campo's game from a free running midfielder to one who concentrates on tackles "
........" but that is a pretty fair illustration of how his game style has changed. "


How has his style changed?
I'm not here to bag Campo but if you're going to defend him, at least be factual with your defence.

You also miss the point about encouraging the younger group.
I dont care if Campo is "someone they can relate to".
I want someone who sets the standard on the field.
I'm sure they could relate to Laurie Angwin as well but thats not the issue.
I want our topliners dragging the group along.
Setting the standard for the youngsters to aspire to.
I'm sure the club can worry about where the kids live!

As for players of similar value, perhaps Ricciutto.
Simon Black perhaps?
How about Robert Harvey?
What's the point?
Players recieve contracts for what they WILL bring to the group, what potential they have.
Not for what they have given previously.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:08 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
Blue Vain wrote:
As a matter of fact, during the terms of this contract, Campo has been in our top 10 once for average tackles per game. :?


Would that be as far back as last season??

Blue Vain wrote:
As for players of similar value, perhaps Ricciutto.
Simon Black perhaps?
How about Robert Harvey?
What's the point?
Players recieve contracts for what they WILL bring to the group, what potential they have.
Not for what they have given previously.


Bit like Rawlings, Ottens, Carey, etc, etc, etc.

Campo was paid market value at the time. No-one had a problem then.

Every player manager will tell you that if a player stays at a club "he would have received more on the open market"

Fevola, Dal Santos, Kelly are all cases in point.

_________________
Working alone. At the coalface. Scott's gone for lunch! Said he would be back in 30 mins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
Shakin77 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
As a matter of fact, during the terms of this contract, Campo has been in our top 10 once for average tackles per game. :?


Would that be as far back as last season??


As far as I know, Campo is in the last year of a 4 year contract.
So, in effect that would include last year.

Is that difficult to understand? :?

BTW, Josh asked which midfielders were similar to Campo in terms of remuneration.
I was answering his question.
Are you suggesting I was incorrect?

ps. In case you had'nt noticed, Rawlings, Carey and Ottens arent midfielders.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
So BlueVain your happy with Campo's 1%ers up to this season? Or even JUST last season?

No.
I've not been happy with his one percenters at all but he's not Robinson Crusoe there.

How about if I asked you to tell me how Campo's tackles/per game compares to the list over the last 2 season? Or Even the period of his contract as a whole?

2002. 13th for Carlton
2003 16th
2004 2nd
2005 to date 13th

Comprehensive enough?
Are you happy with those figures.

I thought Campo had been a down hill skier since 2000?

Where have I stated that?
I'm disappointed with Campo's output but then again, I'm disappointed with most of our players.
If people want to portray Campo as some sort of tackling machine or say he has altered his game to become a tackler, surely they must be accountable for their claims?
If we are going to make judgements, lets be armed with the facts.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
Sorry Shakin, I quoted you before you deleted your post. :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:17 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
Your too quick BlueVain. :) All fair points.

PS: I wanted the tackles per game over the 4 year period. Not each year!

1st in total tackles over that period - 182. 13th in avg tackles per game.

_________________
Working alone. At the coalface. Scott's gone for lunch! Said he would be back in 30 mins.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group