fjanyc wrote:
verbs why are you being such a smart arse. Seriously, the only point Synbad is making is that because of additional payments that are allowed under the salary cap rules -- whether it be because of marketing or veteren payments -- the club was maxing out and at the top end of player payments. As for the $1 million contract Kouta is on, I haven't seen him, his manager or anyone deny the fact that he was on contract in that vicinity. If you guys seriously think that paying one guy around 20% of total player payments is healthy for the club and doesn't lead to resentment within the playing group and skew everyone's perspective as to what they're worth you're mistaken. Noone enjoys these pointless posts, where the only thing you're trying to achieve is to get under other posters' skins. I also thought the comments you directed to Sandramd were appalling. Grow up. And rather than use emoticons and "HA HA", if you have a serious point to make, then make it.
Are you serious?
If all clubs have the same salary caps and the same total player payment levels, how can we be going broke because we have to pay more to Kouta than other clubs are paying to their players?
Are we rorting the system, paying over and above our allocated payment levels, and thus sending our club broke...???
Deary me...it's crap posts like this and others which bring up such woeful, misinformed tripe which make me go "HAHAHAHAHA" ... do you even think before you post??????
Come on...football salaries have ABSOLUTELY NO EFFECT ON THE CLUBS' BOTTOM LINE!!!
If you can't understand this, why post ???, just go post in "Talking Stuff"!!!