Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 7:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Even if you accept that Pagan has failed which I dont I still cant get anyone to give me alternatives to Denis Pagan...the old days are over....no amount of money can buy you success now...its the rebuild from scratch method with youth....accept it...
Look at Malthouse..850K a year, cashed up with money to spend, stable admin but no better than us.....tried the retred route, failed..back to draft picks and youth.....and patience.......
Look at Essendon*..for years the leaders.....Sheedy traded, did the retred stuff clung on to being a midpack team and now where is he..yep...back with Denis and Mick rebuilding with kids.....
Terry Wallace..rebuilding with kids......tell me where the supercoach is who has got another method..give me his name..

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Last edited by Elwood Blues1 on Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
Sydney Blue wrote:
Deano we finished last in 2002 and last in 2005 where have we moved forward- We have a lot of young players on our list that we hope- I stress that point HOPE will turn into future champions - we could have got to this point a lot quicker than we have - therefore we are no better off than in 2002 as back then we were all saying it was going to be 3-4 years before we were competitive - we are saying the same now - that bloody goal post keeps moving away


:lol: :lol: Stop looking over my shoulder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:27 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
Even if you accept that Pagan has failed which I dont I still cant get anyone to give me alternatives to Denis Pagan...the old days are over....no amount of money can buy you success now...its the rebuild from scratch method with youth....accept it...
Look at Malthouse..850K a year, cashed up with money to spend, stable admin but no better than us.....tried the retred route, failed..back to draft picks and youth.....and patience.......
Look at Essendon*..for years the leaders.....Sheedy traded, did the retred stuff clung on to being a midpack team and now where is he..yep...back with Denis and Mick rebuilding with kids.....
Terry Wallace..rebuilding with kids......tell me where the supercoach is who has got another method..give me his name..


Don't think we need a super coach. I think we should get someone younger because the game is changing. Gary O'Donnell, Mark Harvey, Barry Mitchell etc and pay them half what Pagan is on.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
SurreyBlue wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:

The worst part about the last 3 years is that we have ended up right back where we started


Rubbish. Our list is a shitload healthier now than it was at the end of 2002. We have moved on in leaps and bounds, even if we don't have the tangible results to prove it.

there is light at the end of the tunnel now. In 2002 there was light but it was attached to an oncoming train.


Don't agree. We have the "unknow" with us now. Young kids who might become footballers. In 2002 we had players such as McKay & Ratten still leading the way and able to hold their own. Our list might be better now (who knows, not me yet and I doubt anyone else can be certain how good Bower, Hartlett, Kennedy, Murphy, Bentick, Blackwell ,etc etc etc can be) but our position is exactly 16th. Pretty sure that's where we started from except as I mentioned the extra embarassing loses.


McKay and Ratten were at the end of their careers. And there were no embarrassing losses in 2002?

What else is Pagan supposed to do? Maybe we can open the chequebook and buy the best five players from the SANFL, that'll fix it.

What's that? It's 2006? Sorry I thought it was 1986.


Stop whinging, and tell us what Pagan should be doing.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21651
Location: North of the border
SurreyBlue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Deano we finished last in 2002 and last in 2005 where have we moved forward- We have a lot of young players on our list that we hope- I stress that point HOPE will turn into future champions - we could have got to this point a lot quicker than we have - therefore we are no better off than in 2002 as back then we were all saying it was going to be 3-4 years before we were competitive - we are saying the same now - that bloody goal post keeps moving away


:lol: :lol: Stop looking over my shoulder.


You just type quicker :lol:

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:37 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Deano Supremo wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:

The worst part about the last 3 years is that we have ended up right back where we started


Rubbish. Our list is a shitload healthier now than it was at the end of 2002. We have moved on in leaps and bounds, even if we don't have the tangible results to prove it.

there is light at the end of the tunnel now. In 2002 there was light but it was attached to an oncoming train.


Don't agree. We have the "unknow" with us now. Young kids who might become footballers. In 2002 we had players such as McKay & Ratten still leading the way and able to hold their own. Our list might be better now (who knows, not me yet and I doubt anyone else can be certain how good Bower, Hartlett, Kennedy, Murphy, Bentick, Blackwell ,etc etc etc can be) but our position is exactly 16th. Pretty sure that's where we started from except as I mentioned the extra embarassing loses.


McKay and Ratten were at the end of their careers. And there were no embarrassing losses in 2002?

What else is Pagan supposed to do? Maybe we can open the chequebook and buy the best five players from the SANFL, that'll fix it.

What's that? It's 2006? Sorry I thought it was 1986.


Stop whinging, and tell us what Pagan should be doing.


retiring.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheGame wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
TheGame wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Pagan has achieved nothing more than Brittain. As much as it pains me to say, both have been as bad as each other. :cry:
The worst part about the last 3 years is that we have ended up right back where we started plus with numerous, and I man numerousssss 100 point thumpings from every single f***ng opposition club. That is Pagan's record ........ doesn't read well, does it.

I'm sorry I forget, we are rebuilding, tanking or just plain shit though. Irrelevant wether our players are "not" having a red hot go every week. :roll: :oops:


But it's all Parkin's fault and Bradley's too.


That simplification is almost as laughable as the 'it's all Pagan's fault' crap that gets spewed around.


Buck stops with the coach. Parkin is a Carlton triple premiership coach, Pagan is a Carlton wooden spoon coach.


Simple as that hey?

Parkin had superstar lists, hand picked and paid for with brown paper bags that got him those three premierships (not that he wasn't a good coach on top of that).

Pagan had a list full of VFL standard players (Plunkett, Eccles), has beens from other clubs whose best days were behind them (Mansfield, McKernan) and a couple of champions in their auttumn years (McKay, Ratten). Pagan also had no access to the first two rounds of the draft for the next two years.

I'll ask again Game, what should Pagan have done differently aside from keeping the hugely talented Callan Beasy on the list?

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheGame wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:

The worst part about the last 3 years is that we have ended up right back where we started


Rubbish. Our list is a shitload healthier now than it was at the end of 2002. We have moved on in leaps and bounds, even if we don't have the tangible results to prove it.

there is light at the end of the tunnel now. In 2002 there was light but it was attached to an oncoming train.


Don't agree. We have the "unknow" with us now. Young kids who might become footballers. In 2002 we had players such as McKay & Ratten still leading the way and able to hold their own. Our list might be better now (who knows, not me yet and I doubt anyone else can be certain how good Bower, Hartlett, Kennedy, Murphy, Bentick, Blackwell ,etc etc etc can be) but our position is exactly 16th. Pretty sure that's where we started from except as I mentioned the extra embarassing loses.


McKay and Ratten were at the end of their careers. And there were no embarrassing losses in 2002?

What else is Pagan supposed to do? Maybe we can open the chequebook and buy the best five players from the SANFL, that'll fix it.

What's that? It's 2006? Sorry I thought it was 1986.


Stop whinging, and tell us what Pagan should be doing.


retiring.


Another well thought out reasoned reply.

You clearly have nothing positive to contribute so this discussion.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:41 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Plunkett dominated a final. Pagan's boy Wiggins will never be good enough to make a side that plays in one.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:48 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
TheGame wrote:
Plunkett dominated a final. Pagan's boy Wiggins will never be good enough to make a side that plays in one.


And what'd Plunkett do in 2002?

SFA.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
I think "the game "is suggesting ODonnell, Harvey or the like at half the money is his solution and that the days of the supercoach are over.....Paul Roos maybe gives some cred to that...I'm not suggesting that I agree as i think Pagan initially gave us a kickstart that maybe a no name coach couldnt do and that the club needed a high profile coach initially to get the supporters, sponsors on board with confidence...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheGame wrote:
Plunkett dominated a final. Pagan's boy Wiggins will never be good enough to make a side that plays in one.


Why the Brisbane Lions never picked up Plunkett when we gave him the chop is beyond me too. :roll:

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
If Mark Harvey even drives past Princes Park to go to 7-11 for a slurpee I'll be pissed.

The very thought *shudder*

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I think "the game "is suggesting ODonnell, Harvey or the like at half the money is his solution and that the days of the supercoach are over.....Paul Roos maybe gives some cred to that...I'm not suggesting that I agree as i think Pagan initially gave us a kickstart that maybe a no name coach couldnt do and that the club needed a high profile coach initially to get the supporters, sponsors on board with confidence...


This is a good point.

A lower profile coach most likely would not have survived 2003, there would have been a sacking, more instability when we least needed it, less members, less money, even further away from where we are now.

Unless of course that 'other' coach could have made strawberry jam out of pig shit.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
TheGame has a point here and all it seems that the rest of us have is 'hope' that his point will oneday be proven wrong.

@#$%&! I hope so... :-D

The amount of grey areas and opinions that is footy discussion ..I wouldn't think 'concrete' would be used to describe them, Deano.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
I just think there is too big a generation gap between coach and players. Maybe a coach 15-20 years younger could have got through to a guy like Norman who is another talented player to get the boot. A better communicator than Dennis' boot camp 'You f#$% up and we'll send ya home!' style.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:06 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Just looked at the topic this thread has gone way way off track and I'll take full responibility for it and I'm sorry. (Something Pagan never has or never will do.)

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheGame wrote:
I just think there is too big a generation gap between coach and players. Maybe a coach 15-20 years younger could have got through to a guy like Norman who is another talented player to get the boot.


Then why didn't one of the younger coaches (Roos, Thompson, Laidley) get hold of Karl Norman?

Because he was a lost cause. A younger coach wouldn't have done shit.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:09 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Deano Supremo wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I just think there is too big a generation gap between coach and players. Maybe a coach 15-20 years younger could have got through to a guy like Norman who is another talented player to get the boot.


Then why didn't one of the younger coaches (Roos, Thompson, Laidley) get hold of Karl Norman?

Because he was a lost cause. A younger coach wouldn't have done shit.


You don't know that. There are plenty of talented players that don't play in the big time Deano for whatever reason.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheGame wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I just think there is too big a generation gap between coach and players. Maybe a coach 15-20 years younger could have got through to a guy like Norman who is another talented player to get the boot.


Then why didn't one of the younger coaches (Roos, Thompson, Laidley) get hold of Karl Norman?

Because he was a lost cause. A younger coach wouldn't have done shit.


You don't know that. There are plenty of talented players that don't play in the big time Deano for whatever reason.


We tried to trade him didn't we? Nobody wanted him!

Seems these younger wonder coaches that you idolise Game agree with me on this one!

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group