There's no questioning your passion and your knowledge of the game of Aussie Rules (contributors).
Everyone who has seen the 2005 team and the last two games has an opinion. Their opinion is how they saw the game, and you can't take that away from them...and then there's the crew who have attended numerous training sessions, who should have an even better insight than most. I've only been privy to see the Newcastle intra club and Geelong games live, and replays of the Geelong game, so my exposure has been somewhat limited.
I'd be interested and love to see some of the supporters' best team for the 2006 season (including 6 on the interchange), and we could go from there to determine what the season holds for us. There will be two schools of thought; the team that has a better chance to win games, and the team we develop for 2007 and beyond. I am more interested in the former, as my Under 25 team looks the goods for the future and naturally there will be a few more good and great inclusions over the next couple of years.
I for one am an optimist, and may have a foolish outlook, but last week's game and the improved list in 2006 (recruits, skills and bodies) shows we can field 24 competitive players on the field. I guess that the hit out yesterday must have been full of experimentation from DP but most importantly I believe it as a wake up call to the whole club, let alone each and every individual taking the field as to what it takes to be a winner in the AFL comp.
I struggle with the game plan, as I would prefer an attacking style, and developing systems (some from accidents that worked) without bombing it into the forward line, and a backline that is building some sort of system and understing of each other's style, strengths and weaknesses. Whilst not a huge Livo in the backline fan, he did excite me at the beginning of last season before he was injured, hence I would have had him in playing in the last two games as well as Bryan and Bannister, just to see how they are at this stage, as an in form Livo and Bannister in the backline could release Thornton, and Whitnall from KP. Would Bryan make a CHB? (I know nothing about his pace). But to me it starts in the middle, and it's the backline that withstands any offensive from the opposition, whilst the forward line takes advantage of the delivery.
I would also like to hear that in trying times like these last 4, that supporters stick together, encourage their team, and show up to see the team that has given us gold over the last 40 years....that's the only way to shut up the opposition's supporters, and build our young guys' confidence. We've got to give them a sense of belonging to the Blue Brotherhood.
THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK!
Incidently my best team for the year (picked in January), and I'm happy to change with good reason:
B: McGrath Saddington Hartlett
HB: Bannister Thornton Carazzo
C: Walker Stevens Lappin
HF: Whitnall Waite Fisher
F: O'hAlpin Fevola Houlihan
FOLL: French Kouta Bentick
I/C: McLaren/DeLuca (not convinced yet with McLaren as Ruckman)
Scotland
Simpson
Murphy
Betts
Kennedy
and was I saying in another thread that I'm a fan of Prendergast (yep) as a HF running up the wing (could't fit him in) although I've traditionally earmarked two running 6"4" wingmen in Waite and Prendergast.
Bryan strong possibility at CHB or ruck if McLaren/DeLuca don't cut it
and Russell is on my radar . Blackwell 2007.
Scotland looked lazy in the Geelong gameafter a contest, and better watch out.
Any opinions on McLaren? Bannister? Hartlett? Kennedy?
I look forward to seeing some of the Blues legendry scholars' teams.
THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK
|