Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 342 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:30 pm
Posts: 83
From my perspective (which is ever so limited) I believe we should:
Take the first four draft picks up to and including pick 67, elevate Ellard, White and Garlett. Therefore, seven players must make way, so with Wiggins and Hadley retirements the other five would be Fisher, Anderson, Brown, Johnson and Tiller.
I definitely would not take the risk of trying to re rookie Austin and O'Keefe, but probably would risk it for Donaldson, if they want to keep him, that is. Donaldson would have to be delisted as only Casboult, Cachia and Dare can be retained in addition to Touhi and Labi (I believe).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Gold Tommi........Gold :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
ANDERSON HAS A NEW 2 YEAR CONTRACT STOP DELISTING HIM

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14750
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
grrofunger wrote:
ANDERSON HAS A NEW 2 YEAR CONTRACT STOP DELISTING HIM

Ando is on Tommi's ship - undelistable!

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:31 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:30 pm
Posts: 83
grrofunger wrote:
ANDERSON HAS A NEW 2 YEAR CONTRACT STOP DELISTING HIM


Has this been confirmed? If so, who else could be delisted instead: Scotland, Setanta, Thornton?
For me, it would be a huge mistake not to give O'Keefe or Austin another year.
If we don't plan to use pick 67 on a new player, why was it part of the Jacobs trade?
In fact, if we don't use pick 70, too, trading for pick 67 would seem to have little benefit.
If we intend to use pick 67 and only delist four players, then only Ellard and Garlett can be promoted.
Therefore, one of White, Cachia, Dare and Casboult must be delisted as only three can be kept.
I think they have all shown something so I don't think I would take the risk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
blueman2 wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
ANDERSON HAS A NEW 2 YEAR CONTRACT STOP DELISTING HIM


Has this been confirmed? If so, who else could be delisted instead: Scotland, Setanta, Thornton?
For me, it would be a huge mistake not to give O'Keefe or Austin another year.
If we don't plan to use pick 67 on a new player, why was it part of the Jacobs trade?
In fact, if we don't use pick 70, too, trading for pick 67 would seem to have little benefit.
If we intend to use pick 67 and only delist four players, then only Ellard and Garlett can be promoted.
Therefore, one of White, Cachia, Dare and Casboult must be delisted as only three can be kept.
I think they have all shown something so I don't think I would take the risk.


Delisting Cachia or Dare would have less chance of anyone drafting or selecting them as rookies that Casboult or White imo.
Then we could re rookie them. Less risk that way instead of delisting experienced uncontracted players like Scotland and Setanta.

Not doubting NT Blue for one minute. He heard what he heard. BUT...just because Ando's uncle told NT Blue about the 2 year contract doesn't mean that its happened; maybe that's what his manager was negotiating and it hasn't come to fruition. Or, its not a good enough news story for the Blues to get some media coverage. If that's the case why would they re sign him and say nothing? Scared he'll be taken by another team? Don't think so.
Just a thought.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Weren't Geelong annoyed when we nabbed Darey? If we delisted him they could get even for Ladler.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
No way should Austin be axed... It's not his fault injury ruined his 2010.. He did show some good signs when he played seniors in 2009, and the fact we're still light on for Key Position talent should see him safe for 2011...

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:42 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3999
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
If the Anderson deal hasn't been announced, then in treating it as rumour only.

I think Hadley's retirement has helped him, but I still believe he is on the chopping block.

Some great efforts for the club, but doesn't offer enough class.
Next


Dare is an interesting one - I was excited when we got him, but haven't kept track of his progress in Ants unfortunately. Could be one that we need to take a punt on, as there may well be some interest from elsewhere in the rookie draft


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9244
Location: Melbourne
Bluey44 wrote:
If the Anderson deal hasn't been announced, then in treating it as rumour only.



Not doubting anyones info on here, but I'm not so sure he has got a contract yet.
I know this doesn't sound very credible :sly: but my mate grew up with Anderson up North.
I sent him a message saying he got a new contract when I read it on here. He then sent a text to Joey to congratulate him.
Joey called him back and didn't know what he was talking about. Unless Joe has been told to keep it quiet until the club decides to announce list movement??

Either way we'll find out soon. I think he will get another 2 years.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:58 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 96
If it is true that Anderson has been given a 2 year contract, that is ridiculous!!! Poor decision maker and nothing more than a list clogger.
By the way how is O' Hailpin still contracted. Crazy to think he was given a 2 year contract at the end of last year. Because this guy is from Ireland we allow him to have 7 years in the system in hope that he will one day develop into a player. He will never be a good player and should be shown the door.
If we are fair dinkum Fisher, Johnson, Browne, Anderson, O'Hailpin, Austin should all be delisted. Thornton deserves to play out his contract. He has busted his gut in defence while we were a rabble and now Ratts refuses to play him because he doesn't provide run and moves side to side. Surely Ratts can work with Thornton and work on his weaknesses. I believe Thornton is still in our best 22.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Why do people want to delist Austin?

A few misguided souls were cut that we didn't pick Talia to get a KPP, yet a 21 year old tall such as Austin should be sent packing after he played well in the VFL GF. Austin has the athleticism, bravery and size to play across half back, but has been up and down due to injury.

I can't wait for the online fapping and back slapping if we pick talls with picks 18, 33 and 41.

New has to be better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 4581
Location: St Helens
If Austin will make a full recovery from the OP that's been holding him back for quite a while now then he has to be kept on the list surely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
JS74 wrote:
If it is true that Anderson has been given a 2 year contract, that is ridiculous!!! Poor decision maker and nothing more than a list clogger.
By the way how is O' Hailpin still contracted. Crazy to think he was given a 2 year contract at the end of last year. Because this guy is from Ireland we allow him to have 7 years in the system in hope that he will one day develop into a player. He will never be a good player and should be shown the door.
If we are fair dinkum Fisher, Johnson, Browne, Anderson, O'Hailpin, Austin should all be delisted. Thornton deserves to play out his contract. He has busted his gut in defence while we were a rabble and now Ratts refuses to play him because he doesn't provide run and moves side to side. Surely Ratts can work with Thornton and work on his weaknesses. I believe Thornton is still in our best 22.


But Setanta has been a good player for us in those 7 years.
I thought his first half this year was fantastic.
I'm not a huge fan of his as I use to be, but I am not a huge fan of what we have to offer for CHB.
We didn't get our big bidied KPD as we intended during the trade period; that's why I think we did and should retain Setanta.
Beggars can't be choosers.
Perhaps next year we can snag a CHB during trade week, and then Setanta would have to have had a really good 2011 and earn your admiration....and respect.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
Any chance we may get rid of Houlihan? Is he contracted?
If we're planning on playing games for Collins + Garlett, Yarran, Lucas & Kerr why waste a spot with an inconsistent player who will be up for review during/after 2011 anyway. We can get the same from the youngsters whilst getting valuable games experience into them at the same time.
Carrazzo can cover the defensive forward role if needed, as can Mitch, and I don't think it was a loss without him in the team late in 2010.
If Walker goes up forward then there's one less spot for Patches in the fwd50 to take up, with Betts, Kreuzer/Warnock/Hampson, Henderson, Waite, Yarran, Garlett, Collins, Robinson + midfielders rotating through there.
Bullants/back up ony for mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23931
BIRDTOWN wrote:
Any chance we may get rid of Houlihan? Is he contracted?
If we're planning on playing games for Collins + Garlett, Yarran, Lucas & Kerr why waste a spot with an inconsistent player who will be up for review during/after 2011 anyway. We can get the same from the youngsters whilst getting valuable games experience into them at the same time.
Carrazzo can cover the defensive forward role if needed, as can Mitch, and I don't think it was a loss without him in the team late in 2010.
If Walker goes up forward then there's one less spot for Patches in the fwd50 to take up, with Betts, Kreuzer/Warnock/Hampson, Henderson, Waite, Yarran, Garlett, Collins, Robinson + midfielders rotating through there.
Bullants/back up ony for mine.


You must be Cuckoo BirdTown. :smile:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:40 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
BIRDTOWN wrote:
Any chance we may get rid of Houlihan? Is he contracted?
If we're planning on playing games for Collins + Garlett, Yarran, Lucas & Kerr why waste a spot with an inconsistent player who will be up for review during/after 2011 anyway. We can get the same from the youngsters whilst getting valuable games experience into them at the same time.
Carrazzo can cover the defensive forward role if needed, as can Mitch, and I don't think it was a loss without him in the team late in 2010.
If Walker goes up forward then there's one less spot for Patches in the fwd50 to take up, with Betts, Kreuzer/Warnock/Hampson, Henderson, Waite, Yarran, Garlett, Collins, Robinson + midfielders rotating through there.
Bullants/back up ony for mine.


Another country heard from....

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 46
JS74 wrote:
If it is true that Anderson has been given a 2 year contract, that is ridiculous!!! Poor decision maker and nothing more than a list clogger.
By the way how is O' Hailpin still contracted. Crazy to think he was given a 2 year contract at the end of last year. Because this guy is from Ireland we allow him to have 7 years in the system in hope that he will one day develop into a player. He will never be a good player and should be shown the door.
If we are fair dinkum Fisher, Johnson, Browne, Anderson, O'Hailpin, Austin should all be delisted. Thornton deserves to play out his contract. He has busted his gut in defence while we were a rabble and now Ratts refuses to play him because he doesn't provide run and moves side to side. Surely Ratts can work with Thornton and work on his weaknesses. I believe Thornton is still in our best 22.

austin is a must keep he will come good,be patient.
browne is still young he deserves more time.
with anderson i couldnt agree more with you,poor decision maker,looks slow with the ball,disposal is ordinary and for someone who is meant to have pace,well i cant see it.
houlihan i gave up on in 2009,many will say he did agood job as a defensive fwd but seriously after 10 years his application doesnt match his skills,if he hangs on 2011 will be his last.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2775
disagree re Houlihan.
We missed him when he went down injured in the 2nd half of the year.
Has class (we all know that but...) has shown consistency on the field and more competitiveness in the last 2 seasons.
think he balances and our forward line well - the talls, the quick goal sneaks and him, tying them all together.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17242
Thursday afternoon...List Changes - Part 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 342 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diesel_85 and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group