Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 4:13 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:38 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
dannyboy wrote:
I hate to tell you but St Kilda having/not having Daniel Wells is not why they have not won a flag :garthp:


Wells would have to be one of the biggest disappointments to come out of that draft. There are plenty that went much later that are much better. Simmo is one that springs to mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
I hate to tell you but St Kilda having/not having Daniel Wells is not why they have not won a flag :garthp:


Wells would have to be one of the biggest disappointments to come out of that draft. There are plenty that went much later that are much better. Simmo is one that springs to mind.

Wells hasn't been disappointing and I struggle to find players who were drafted later that are "much better" than Wells.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
SA Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Speakers wrote:
He's not worth it Sinners :wink:


Oh im just trying to put his own contributions into some kind of perspective for him.
I dont think he realises his posting worth.... if its not to say "youre not 100% accurate all the time" (because the world doesnt sit still)...there is nothing coming from him... ZILCH.. NADDA... NOTHING....

And SA Blue.. i dont write stuff for you.. you dont like what i write.. why read it??.. so you can react and post 'something'???...

Just face it... no Synbad... no SA BLUE... youre nothing without me.... just go back through your posts and see it yourself... A ZERO...!!! :wink: :lol:
(thats what happens when you live in SA... nothing to do for entertainment..)


You really believe that don't you. You really believe you hold that much worth. There are plenty of my posts here on this site that have nothing to do with you (including a POW about modern football that you had no idea on as you find it impossible to offer anything constructive), but don't get me wrong, I do enjoy stirring you up, as it is so easy to do. You enjoy abusing others, but can't take being questioned. Oh well...

Yes i really believe youre worthless on a board and if it wasnt for me you would contribute nothing.
I made you... youre not much .. but i did make you!!!... :wink:

and you dont stir me up... if youre spending your time stirring me up on a Carlton board.. youre even kore useless than i thought you are... and thats useless.

And how do you question me?
When ive asked you where is ONE SINGLE POST you have contributed here that you have initiated off your own bat and you cant???

Like i said.. no me.. no you...
but that doesnt work the other way round..

thats putting things into perspective for you...

PS Im sure there is a a crowd of people waiting for your next post... :wink: :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:13 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
BlueIce wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
I hate to tell you but St Kilda having/not having Daniel Wells is not why they have not won a flag :garthp:


Wells would have to be one of the biggest disappointments to come out of that draft. There are plenty that went much later that are much better. Simmo is one that springs to mind.

Wells hasn't been disappointing and I struggle to find players who were drafted later that are "much better" than Wells.


Byron Schammer , Brent Staker and Kade Simpson have been clearly more effective IMO. When you consider the reputation Wells had compared to them then yes he has been disappointing. Ryan Crowley is another that springs to mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:24 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
BlueIce wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
I hate to tell you but St Kilda having/not having Daniel Wells is not why they have not won a flag :garthp:


Wells would have to be one of the biggest disappointments to come out of that draft. There are plenty that went much later that are much better. Simmo is one that springs to mind.

Wells hasn't been disappointing and I struggle to find players who were drafted later that are "much better" than Wells.


Byron Schammer , Brent Staker and Kade Simpson have been clearly more effective IMO. When you consider the reputation Wells had compared to them then yes he has been disappointing. Ryan Crowley is another that springs to mind.

It only took a few posts for your credibility to be shot. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:52 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 280
The thing that annoys me about this is that for months there have been authors on this site who spew forth vitriol, rumour, opinion and "inside knowledge" as gospel and so far what has actually occured? You can answer that question all yourselves. As I have stated in the past, it would be folly to believe anything that these type of self-efficacious wankers want to write. In all reality THEY DON'T KNOW what is going on in the inner sanctum, and those of us on here who continue to believe their rumours, or get emotionally caught up in them are only feeding these people's egos. Apparently big-noting yourself on an internet forum is something to be remarkably proud of (or gives more thrills than a cyber-sex chat room???)

Thank God it is only 2 months till the footy starts. Mind you, the gossip and ego-driven bile will not stop until an AGM is called and the member's make a decision on their new President and Board. I sincerely doubt this will stop the ego-maniacs with their continued attacks on everything, and everyone.

I don't have the magic answer - I don't need to. If and when the AGM is called, I will cast my vote and then put trust in whoever is elected to drag the Carlton Football Club out of this mess. Whingeing, complaining and bitching about anything and everyone that one doesn't like or agree with is not going to fix the problems.

I don't pretend to know who is going to form a ticket or who is interested in being a white knight or what playoy bunny is going to pop out of a cake UNTIL things are actually announced and there is something there to discuss intelligently. All this rumour-mongering and bile-spitting is very very tiresome and is honestly a complete waste of time. It seems like every week since the end of the footy season there has been a rumour of some impending change or challenge and guess what. So far - NOTHING. NADA, ZIP, ZILCH, ZERO, JACK etc, etc, etc.

I would suggest to most of you that you wait until there is something concrete to discuss and stop feeding these ego-centric flower-sticks because honestly, once they have an audience they can pretty much say what they in here, true or not, and they get a reaction and feed their addiction. It's a sickness people. Cold turkey is the only cure.!! Oh that and some involuntary stay in a "health resort"

Wake me when something happens - or when the footy starts. Whichever comes first.....ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
Could someone please pass the salt?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:32 pm
Posts: 14
SurreyBlue wrote:
my two cents wrote:
How is Elliot responsible for this cash flow crunch ? This board has had 4 years to steady the ship but somehow we seem to be worse off.


Exactly.


Can we ask GS?


Last edited by bea on Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
BlueIce wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
BlueIce wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
I hate to tell you but St Kilda having/not having Daniel Wells is not why they have not won a flag :garthp:


Wells would have to be one of the biggest disappointments to come out of that draft. There are plenty that went much later that are much better. Simmo is one that springs to mind.

Wells hasn't been disappointing and I struggle to find players who were drafted later that are "much better" than Wells.


Byron Schammer , Brent Staker and Kade Simpson have been clearly more effective IMO. When you consider the reputation Wells had compared to them then yes he has been disappointing. Ryan Crowley is another that springs to mind.

It only took a few posts for your credibility to be shot. 8)


Cool. Whatever you say. :roll:

They have all ranked around the same mark in 2006. Wells came with a HUGE reputation yet has delivered no more than any of these players IMO. To me , that says he is overrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
chyna wrote:
The thing that annoys me about this is that for months there have been authors on this site who spew forth vitriol, rumour, opinion and "inside knowledge" as gospel and so far what has actually occured? You can answer that question all yourselves. As I have stated in the past, it would be folly to believe anything that these type of self-efficacious wankers want to write. In all reality THEY DON'T KNOW what is going on in the inner sanctum, and those of us on here who continue to believe their rumours, or get emotionally caught up in them are only feeding these people's egos. Apparently big-noting yourself on an internet forum is something to be remarkably proud of (or gives more thrills than a cyber-sex chat room???)

Thank God it is only 2 months till the footy starts. Mind you, the gossip and ego-driven bile will not stop until an AGM is called and the member's make a decision on their new President and Board. I sincerely doubt this will stop the ego-maniacs with their continued attacks on everything, and everyone.

I don't have the magic answer - I don't need to. If and when the AGM is called, I will cast my vote and then put trust in whoever is elected to drag the Carlton Football Club out of this mess. Whingeing, complaining and bitching about anything and everyone that one doesn't like or agree with is not going to fix the problems.

I don't pretend to know who is going to form a ticket or who is interested in being a white knight or what playoy bunny is going to pop out of a cake UNTIL things are actually announced and there is something there to discuss intelligently. All this rumour-mongering and bile-spitting is very very tiresome and is honestly a complete waste of time. It seems like every week since the end of the footy season there has been a rumour of some impending change or challenge and guess what. So far - NOTHING. NADA, ZIP, ZILCH, ZERO, JACK etc, etc, etc.

I would suggest to most of you that you wait until there is something concrete to discuss and stop feeding these ego-centric flower-sticks because honestly, once they have an audience they can pretty much say what they in here, true or not, and they get a reaction and feed their addiction. It's a sickness people. Cold turkey is the only cure.!! Oh that and some involuntary stay in a "health resort"

Wake me when something happens - or when the footy starts. Whichever comes first.....ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Chyna, I hate the crap-slinging that goes on here - especially during the off-season - but if there was none of this, the site would probably be dead during this periood... and I'd have nothing to read!! :)

Also, having said that - if everything was rosy at the club - none of this would be mentioned either!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:59 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:37 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:18 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:58 pm
Posts: 211
my two cents wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


Plenty of risk. They either bring the money, or outline their plans for erasing debt and increasing revenue succinctly. Smorgon isn't progressive, whether he can afford to be with our finances as they are, I have no idea. I believe Smorgon can get us back to cash neutral eventually but not in the timeliest or most efficient way. I don't believe he is further digging us into the mire through his own actions, just hoping we can hold on while he takes his own sweet time about correcting things based on his own limitations.

The new ticket has to show something more than that. A new ticket will come in, clear off the tables and start with their own plans. If they can't clearly outline what they will do and how long it will take, then we could get more of the same only over a longer period as Smorgon and co have already started their planning, whatever that may be.

This chat with Smorgon tomorrow will be very interesting now, and hopefully he doesn't get baited into talking about Sinn and Elliot, or more importanly doesn't take the bait. He's better served concentrating on his own issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:37 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
The Old Dark Navy's wrote:

outline their plans for erasing debt and increasing revenue succinctly.


Agree, this needs to happen.

The Old Dark Navy's wrote:

Smorgon isn't progressive, whether he can afford to be with our finances as they are, I have no idea. I believe Smorgon can get us back to cash neutral eventually but not in the timeliest or most efficient way. I don't believe he is further digging us into the mire through his own actions, just hoping we can hold on while he takes his own sweet time about correcting things based on his own limitations.


I am not sure what you mean. Are you saying that we should be reactive beacuse of our dire financial position?

What are you basing this belief on ? Because I cannot come up with one critical issue that Smorgon has managed competently.

The Old Dark Navy's wrote:
If they can't clearly outline what they will do and how long it will take, then we could get more of the same only over a longer period as Smorgon and co have already started their planning, whatever that may be.


Do you have information that they have started planning or is it just speculation? Also the matter is about developing and implementing a sound plan. After the blunders of the last few months it is difficult to trust Smorgon and co to come up with anything robust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:59 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:58 pm
Posts: 211
my two cents wrote:
What are you basing this belief on ? Because I cannot come up with one critical issue that Smorgon has managed competently.

Just a belief. Debts gradually being written down, new blood on the board. Just a feeling is all. Not going to stand behind it and defend it like most opinions.

Quote:
Do you have information that they have started planning or is it just speculation? Also the matter is about developing and implementing a sound plan. After the blunders of the last few months it is difficult to trust Smorgon and co to come up with anything robust.


Just common sense really. Smorgon has finally done something proactive and started looking for people to bring funds into the club. If the new board members are elected, there were promises of funds coming in with them. I'll have to give Smorgon the benefit of the doubt on one point here. He only became president immediately before the season. It seems he hasn't done much to shore up the club but is manouevring since the season finished. We have had some board changes and with that change comes new ideas. A new ticket would probably go back to the drawing board so may start some months behind the current board. If their plan is better, then it will be obvious in the coming weeks. If their plan is not obviously better in comparison, and no money is coming in, then making the change possibly just causes a postponement in addressing our problems as they move into offices, fire and hire applicable staff and sit down to assess the situation. Smorgon and co have already assessed the situation so it stands to reason they are ahead time wise in deciding where to go from here.

Again, just an observation. The new ticket needs to be seen to be offering more for the change to be worthwhile.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
The Old Dark Navy's wrote:
my two cents wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


Plenty of risk. They either bring the money, or outline their plans for erasing debt and increasing revenue succinctly. Smorgon isn't progressive, whether he can afford to be with our finances as they are, I have no idea. I believe Smorgon can get us back to cash neutral eventually but not in the timeliest or most efficient way. I don't believe he is further digging us into the mire through his own actions, just hoping we can hold on while he takes his own sweet time about correcting things based on his own limitations.

The new ticket has to show something more than that. A new ticket will come in, clear off the tables and start with their own plans. If they can't clearly outline what they will do and how long it will take, then we could get more of the same only over a longer period as Smorgon and co have already started their planning, whatever that may be.

This chat with Smorgon tomorrow will be very interesting now, and hopefully he doesn't get baited into talking about Sinn and Elliot, or more importanly doesn't take the bait. He's better served concentrating on his own issues.
Can't half tell you''re Smorgon sympathiser. The bottom line is that a new ticket cannot be worse than the embarrassing, divided, incompetent, fractured rabble we have now that are the AFL's bumboys. Any risk in electing in a new ticket can only be minimal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:08 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:58 pm
Posts: 211
jim wrote:
Can't half tell you''re Smorgon sympathiser. The bottom line is that a new ticket cannot be worse than the embarrassing, divided, incompetent, fractured rabble we have now that are the AFL's bumboys. Any risk in electing in a new ticket can only be minimal.


You can't half tell much at all. I can produce posts critical of Smorgon. I play the devil's advocate usually swimming upstream against the general opinion at the time. Just because I don't get swept along in the traffic, doesn't mean I have an opposing opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:20 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:26 pm
Posts: 332
my two cents wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


100% agree - his list of failures last year was enormous. At the bottom of it all he just makes the wrong decisions time and time again. There is no risk in choosing the Sinn Ticket.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Speedy wrote:
my two cents wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


100% agree - his list of failures last year was enormous. At the bottom of it all he just makes the wrong decisions time and time again. There is no risk in choosing the Sinn Ticket.


Can you please post the list?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Speedy wrote:
my two cents wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
There is no alternative to the currnet board.

Don't vote for change for the sake of it.

We need to embrace or merge. Those who like infighting and politican are pushing us closer to the North MELBOURNE Blues.

BE CAREFUL


I too want to hear out the vision and plans of the rival ticket. But really, what is the risk in supporting the challenge? They couldn't be any worse. To me Smorgon has failed on all accounts - lack of leadership, no vision, no business nous, inability to attract sponsors, and the list goes on...I would rather let someone new have a go.


100% agree - his list of failures last year was enormous. At the bottom of it all he just makes the wrong decisions time and time again. There is no risk in choosing the Sinn Ticket.


No risk?

The club is in a precarious position and there is no risk???

I don't know who I am voting for yet, but I am sure I will be carefully studying what all the incumbents and challengers are offering for the future and trying to use my best judgement from there.

To blindly vote without knowing what everyone has to offer is to put our club at risk.

This is one of the most important elections in the history of the club, we as voting members have to get it right, if we get it wrong the consequences could be dire.

Whether that means keeping people already there or voting new people in we should wait until all the cards are on the table to make a decision.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group