dannyboy wrote:
now I didn't ask who he was assisting, rather if he was a head coach anywhere? Perhaps not ready to take it on just yet.
No, Danny you asked who he's coaching.
dannyboy wrote:
but you;ve stated youd have had him before Pagan which is a bloody big call considering he has not even got a senior coaching job with anyone -
No, you're incorrect again young man.
Someone asked who was available as a potential coach and I mentioned his name.
I didnt mention Pagan.
But for the record, yes I would take a mix of Lyon and Mitchell over Pagan and Elshaugh.
IMHO the basic message our players are looking for is inconsistent and I dont believe they have total confidence in the abilities of coach.
We have spent 3 years trying to get them to alter their instincts of creative football and now we're trying to reinstate it.
I believe we are reactive, the coaches are looking for answers instead of giving them and we are tactically well below average.
As for taking on an inexperienced coach, Lyon is far more experienced than Worsfold or Roos were.
You remember them? The Grand Final coaches.
We are too conservative and scared to take a risk.
As a supporter I wasnt keen on Pagan but I upped my membership to help the club. Our members rallied to help the club survive, they didnt rally because we had Pagan.
As for the sponsor argument, thats crap as well. I know several sponsors and they associate with the club because they
a. Support Carlton and are trying to help
or
b. They are getting value for money.
This wont be a popular view but its just my opinion. I'll support the club whether Pagan or anyone else coaches but if I had the option, I'd look to the future.
As for the match simulation, the ruckmen for both sides were instructed to drop back across half back which they consistently did.
Dempsey was actually on the field instructing them where to stand.
