billc3 wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
billc3 wrote:
robertbb wrote:
That Grigg guy goes alright. Maybe we can get him and pick 14 for Yaz?

But seriously, Yaz is the cream. He's been fun to watch but he's not going to deliver us anything with the players around him. If Richmond thinks they're ready for some "top up class", they a) are kidding themselves, and b) will have to pay for it.
Pick 14 and Corey Ellis for Yarran. I'd say Menadue but he's a HBF and we have, like, 27 of those.
At least tigers are showing what a bit of good coahing, player buy in and adherence to plan can achieve...their list isnt much better than ours
You are kidding about the relative quality of the two lists, aren't you?
Who do we have that compares to Rance and Riewoldt? Jamo and Jones?
Cochin = Murphy
Deledio = Gibbs
Martin =???
Edwards =???
Chaplin =??? (Rowe?)
Lists are in different galaxies.
Yarran =
Henderson =
Kreuzer =
Dougherty =
Simpson =
I could go on...
Slight differences, yes... Way ahead on talent and ability... No
My point is Moshe that a well coached team of good players will look like superstars, a poorly coached team of good players will make them look like spuds.
Not talking about our last few weeks... Not a time to judge us.
BUT Tigers beat Hawks and most of their players can't hit the side of a barn by foot or hand, but they pressured, made every Hawthorn possession a contest and won the contests. Game over.
(I agree we have no forward like Reiwoldt... But the lists aren't that different)
I do get what you're saying, and I agree with it. However, their list is a lot stronger than ours.
Yarran and Hendo have given us not much - basically Grigg and Vickery.
Kreuzer = Maric (in terms of output)
I don't know who Dougherty is
Simpson = Newman (except Newman can kick).
_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit
http://fromthemoshpit.com/