london blue wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
london blue wrote:
Rexy wrote:
We need 2 picks in the top 10 and preferably the #1 pick of GWS if they finish last - how do we do it ???
No we don't. How many top 10 picks are playing for the swans?
Ok, we need two picks in the low 50s, then.
We aren't the Swans, we are not in the same position as they are (or even
were) and they haven't been successful enough for long enough to be the 'be all and end all' of AFL benchmarks. If we went exclusively 'swansesque' at this stage it woulds do more harm than good.
Point is, doesn't matter what the pick is, it is how you use it or them.
I'd be happy to argue that over the last 10 years the Swnas have used their picks and traded far more successfully than us.
However, if you think that more high draft picks is the solution.........

High picks are worth their weight in gold: Vance, Livingston, Russell, Lucas, Watson.....Tambling
I would argue that Swans have picked 2nd rounders who have proven more value than some #1 picks

Same with other teams...Darling rings a bell.
Can we get Karnezis who has been in the best 3 for the Lions reserves for 5 consecutive weeks....or should I saybest for months and not getting a go. Can play tall HB, midfield HF. IMO he was their best in the NAB GF...Embley like when he was young.
There's a plethora of excess talls at the Eagles, Bumbers and Swans for a start.....much better than Mitchell, Rowe, McCarthy, White, Davies, Watson...maybe even Laidler too (given he's not starring in the 2's). We are carrying duds.