Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 10:07 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Rafalution wrote:
A couple of points.

1. This is a final where tackling and pressure increases. Walker can't tackle, we all agree this is his current fault, so why would we bring him back to play, and to play on Goodes, of whom breaks even the best tacklers efforts?

2. Jack wins his own ball, in the packs. IMO Ellard or AJ is perfect, I can't see Armfield on Jack in the midfield. Armfield will be needed on Jetta.


..everything with most, except the Jack match-ups.. ..AJ to tag yes, Ellard to tag no.. ..leave Ellard to do what he does best for us.. ..get the ball in and under, and block for the others..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35992
Location: Half back flank
Sydney $1.42

Carlton $2.85

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10103
Location: Australia
When we play interstate we usually take one emergency, so this weekend with the Ants Final on Saturday and the Blues on Sunday, seems like one unlucky fringe player will probably end up missing both finals. :cry:

I guess the emergency could play in the Ants on Saturday and then fly up Saturday night but probably not worth the risk given what is at stake.

Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 7:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm
Posts: 2833
We are always worrying about who is going to play on X and Y. Let them worry about who is going to play on Murph, Juddy, Gibbs, Simmo, Hendo, Garlett, Waite etc.

According to Dwaaaayne ( :mad: ) they will have the Rising Star for the year returning and also the most improved player in Pike on the field. Well hopefully Jeffry can show Dwaaaayne that he too could be a Rising Star contender and Robbie W too has improved.

The first quarter is very important, we cannot allow them to get the same head start they got the last time we played them at Etihad.

GO BLUES!!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:26 am
Posts: 939
JOSEPH HAS TO TAG JACK, or are we going to let him cut us up like Hill did last week ? Thornton needs to play & should follow Goodes around like a sheep. He has probably never done it before, but he could rise to the challenge, and after ?????? losses in a row, we need to consider something different to the same old PREDICTABLE slop that we have dished up over and over again against this mob. I don't know why Walker got dropped last week. He must play, even if we spring a surprise & play him up forward, where he has done OK before, or even in the middle. If you keep making the same mistakes time & time again and expect a different result - you are a moron. Time to take some chances & spring a few surprises - for once. Why not start Betts & Robinson in the centre square ? Bring back Fisher and play him at full forward. Do something.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14750
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Asp wrote:
JOSEPH HAS TO TAG JACK, or are we going to let him cut us up like Hill did last week ? Thornton needs to play & should follow Goodes around like a sheep. He has probably never done it before, but he could rise to the challenge, and after 1 loss in a row, we need to consider something different to the same old PREDICTABLE slop that we have dished up over and over again against this mob. I don't know why Walker got dropped last week. He must play, even if we spring a surprise & play him up forward, where he has done OK before, or even in the middle. If you keep making the same mistakes time & time again and expect a different result - you are a moron. Time to take some chances & spring a few surprises - for once. Why not start Betts & Robinson in the centre square ? Bring back Fisher and play him at full forward. Do something.


?

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35992
Location: Half back flank
A Few Showers. Decreasing Clouds. Mild.

Min 17 Max 25

http://www.weather.com.au/nsw/sydney

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25688
Location: Bondi Beach
TheGame wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Rohan Connolly: Swans get raw deal over 'home final'
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 13xl9.html

:roll:


Mike Sheahan did an article on the finals today and talked about the top 7 and then went on to mention Melbourne and North lol.


And last night on OTC Hirdy used llogic to point out that Sheehan is not consistent when judging Judd. Sheehan agreed. He also suggested to Sheehan that he apologise for ongoing barrage against Judd.

Sheehan = :screwy: = Bee in bonnet

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:45 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Asp wrote:
JOSEPH HAS TO TAG JACK, or are we going to let him cut us up like Hill did last week ? Thornton needs to play & should follow Goodes around like a sheep. He has probably never done it before, but he could rise to the challenge, and after ?????? losses in a row, we need to consider something different to the same old PREDICTABLE slop that we have dished up over and over again against this mob. I don't know why Walker got dropped last week. He must play, even if we spring a surprise & play him up forward, where he has done OK before, or even in the middle. If you keep making the same mistakes time & time again and expect a different result - you are a moron. Time to take some chances & spring a few surprises - for once. Why not start Betts & Robinson in the centre square ? Bring back Fisher and play him at full forward. Do something.

Image

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13558
Location: Melbourne
CK95 wrote:
A Few Showers. Decreasing Clouds. Mild.

Min 17 Max 25

http://www.weather.com.au/nsw/sydney


25?!

When was the last time it was over 20 in Melbourne? May?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35992
Location: Half back flank
Ji May?

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 1757
For mine i'd have
INS: Jacobs, Hadley and Thronton
Outs: Hammer, Davies and Carrots(inj)

It seems to me that even Ratts is trying to convince himself that McLean should play.
If thats the case im very worried. Having watched the ants last week Brock's body aint up to it this season and if Ratts wants hard bodies then Hadley at this stage is way ahead of him.
I just hope his facination with Brock playing this week isnt a form of justification for picking him up with a first round draft pick.
Brock looked slow and cannot be fully fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
deano35 wrote:
For mine i'd have
INS: Jacobs, Hadley and Thronton
Outs: Hammer, Davies and Carrots(inj)

It seems to me that even Ratts is trying to convince himself that McLean should play.
If thats the case im very worried. Having watched the ants last week Brock's body aint up to it this season and if Ratts wants hard bodies then Hadley at this stage is way ahead of him.
I just hope his facination with Brock playing this week isnt a form of justification for picking him up with a first round draft pick.
Brock looked slow and cannot be fully fit.


Your being a bit hard, there is a place for Brock.

If someone threw a grenade into the change room, Brock is the perfect guy to dive on it.

Just gotta find a grenade.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35992
Location: Half back flank
deano35 wrote:
For mine i'd have
INS: Jacobs, Hadley and Thronton
Outs: Hammer, Davies and Carrots(inj)



Same for me. Bit reluctant to drop Hammer, but Jacobs was very good on Sat.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Don't think you will see Thornton back in.
Sauce for Hammer.
Hadley for ??
Not sure of any others.

Think Yarran may travel as emergency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
I dislike Adam Goodes and hope he gets lost on the way to the ground.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10103
Location: Australia
CK95 wrote:
deano35 wrote:
For mine i'd have
INS: Jacobs, Hadley and Thronton
Outs: Hammer, Davies and Carrots(inj)



Same for me. Bit reluctant to drop Hammer, but Jacobs was very good on Sat.



Yes the ins look good to me, we have to win now so form is paramount, the home and away season is the time for investing in potential, not during finals
- No matter what Hammers potential is, you can't go past Jacobs form in the Ants, 3.6 while rucking most of the game!
- We absolutely need either Hadley or Maclean to get the ball out and free up Judd in the stoppages, the swans are going to go in hard and try and bottle the ball up
- Again Thornton is in great form, unlike Bower and Jamo

Not convinced on Davies as an out and Carrots may come up, but I think we need these three ins.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2775
In my view:

Out: Davies, Carrazzo
In: Thornton, Walker

I also wouldn't mind Hadley coming in but not sure for whom? Maybe Yarran but I think that robs us of pace, our key weapon, and I think there is better long term advantage of playing Yarran in as many finals as we can.

Drove past Gosch's Paddock this morning and saw the Pies out there in the wet. Couldn't help but think back to us cancelling an intraclub b/c of rain. All year, they have played the same way irrespective of conditions or opponent. We have played a bit too much like a team who cancels training due to rain...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:54 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:24 pm
Posts: 194
Location: South of the Yarra
I'd like to see Jacobs come in for for Hammer.

Based on last week's performance in the Ants I wouldn't play Brock unless carrotts doesn't come up.

If it was up to me Thornton would be in for Davies (and would play regularly ahead of Jamo & Bower).

Unfortunately the coach will not play T-Bird so there is no chance of this happening.

_________________
Life is made up of 3 things: Pre-Season, Post Season & Footy Season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:15 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:07 am
Posts: 567
Location: sunshine coast
Apologies, it's probably written elsewhere.

Ifffffff we get up on Sunday, whom are we likely to play?

Not overly confident, but I think we are worth getting on the odds shown earlier.

Regards
Pedro.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group