Thanks for your kind words Gerry
I know a fair bit about Southern Cross for a variety of reasons but last time I LOOKED Shane Healy was not its CEO not CFO and probably in middle management but far from a key person in Southern Cross so not sure that he has the skills to be the CEO of our football club.As for being key to the success of Southern Cross if he resigned tomorrow there would be no change in the share price no change in its strategic direction and no impact on Southern Cross management .He may be a competent operator in middle management but not of the same calibre as someone like FOR EXAMPLE Fahour of NAB Penn/Owen at Axa or Slatter at Tabcorp. He is not of the calibre of other sports administrators such as Speed Sutherland ONeil McNamee and even Ben Buckley.In other words if we want a new CEO then go for people of that calibre not someone like Shane Healy .Getting guys of the calibre of those set out above would be a coup but I think we should set our sights much higher than Shane Healy.
In my view he is not even as good as present CEO s at other clubs including Cook Harris Robson to name a few .
Just because the sporting press know Shane Healy and are pushing his barrow doesnt mean he necessarily has the skills to take on objectively one of the most difficult jobs in Australian Football.
I find it rather ironic that posters can slag Michael Malouf unmercifully but the minute anyone questions the credentials of a would be successor then they are attacking the man.Perhaps my earlier post was not as clear as it should be and apologise to those who know Healy personally I try to not attack anyone personally but Healy in my estimation is not as capable as Michael Malouf and find it objectively.
Moreover there seems to be a penchant here to think that anyone that is not the incumbent would be able to be President or CEO of our football club.Im not part of the cheer squad I want the opposition to tell me why I should prefer them to the malouf/Smorgan administration .Im not wedded to these guys but like when Collo took Black Jack on in my view he needed to articulate what was his vision for the club other than simply he was anti- Black Jack.I Want the current opposition to articulate their vision /strategy rather than simply be anti- Smorgan and Malouf. If Newton and Greg Lee cant do this because they are part of the present board surely their supporters could do so.
Speedy any idea how the ordinary supporter gets to speak to Newton or Lee to understand their position ?
As for the word sagacious it means eating too many sausages at the nursing home
I hope this clarifies my position.