Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:52 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
Elliott refused to comment when contacted yesterday by The Age and would not respond to speculation that cardboard magnate Dick Pratt would fund a challenge to wipe out most of the Carlton board and pay out coach Denis Pagan.

seriously if these people think sacking the coaching is going to solve our on field problems they are sadly mistaken and not not the people I want running my club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17238
Jim Wilson is writing the Herald Sun article remember...he has his own views on the board situation and decided to run with the Moulton / Harrison push - when he could have easily gone with the Tom Elliott story. That should tell you something right there.

What troubles me is that Wilson says
Quote:
Both have ties with the mortgage industry and it is understood they'll generate much-needed revenue if successful at the club's election.


I don't believe that for a second. I can't see these two providing any more revenue to the club than the two who are leaving in Valmorbida and particularly Mathieson.

I don't believe Tom's surname would damage him greatly - there are still a lot of Carlton people who recognise the great things John Elliott did for Carlton and the bulk of those just want him to acknowledge that he was at fault. You certainly wouldn't get any argument from Tom Elliott about that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:03 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
It's a quandry. (Have to use the word QUANDRY on the Tuesday before Friday).

John Elliot rightfully wears a significant proportion of the blame for Carlton's demise and his return to the club as father of the president would be concerning...but from what I know of Tom, he is his own man, well-spoken, and articulate.

Considering our position, if Tom had the RIGHT backing, a SOLID plan communictaed to members and the media, he could be a tantilising and unifying choice.

He is an Elliot, John Elliot's son, a deeply Carlton dynasty...this would be likely to convince the old mob.

He is not John Elliot, he is Tom and he has a fresh plan based on his and the members intentions for the Blues winning premierships again...this may be enough to convince those wounded by his father's pestilance and desperate for positive change to run with him.

Oh quandry. Oh, go the mighty quandry.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17238
It's only a Quandry if it doesn't come with guarenteed money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
I was thinking more of the plan and effect. If there's no money then we may as well be talking about Joffa becoming president.




:?:


Could that happen?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:16 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I think if either party are willing to pay out Denis Pagan it will have massive appeal to the rank and file members...


I have to say you are incorrect here. The rank and file members generally side with Caro re: Pagan and think he's getting stitched by the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:19 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18076
BIBI01 wrote:
seriously if these people think sacking the coaching is going to solve our on field problems they are sadly mistaken and not not the people I want running my club


Did I miss something?
Where did anyone say that sacking Pagan will solve all our on field problems? :?

AFAIC, its the first positive step in a mid term process.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:26 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
Blue Vain wrote:
BIBI01 wrote:
seriously if these people think sacking the coaching is going to solve our on field problems they are sadly mistaken and not not the people I want running my club


Did I miss something?
Where did anyone say that sacking Pagan will solve all our on field problems? :?

AFAIC, its the first positive step in a mid term process.


sacking pagan has been one of fraser brown's main plays, not to mention the board tried to sack him

why else would they push so hard to have pagan sacked?
because they believe pagan is the reason for our poor onfield performances.

sure pagan has some responsibility but not sole responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
Deliciously ironic - and will piss off Demetrispew and Ron "Lazarus" Evans.

Externally they will have to bite their lips if Tom Elliott gets up.

Whats that proverb about punishing the son for the sins of his father.


Only problem is Demetrispew is a vindictive son of a bitch and will do his best to make life hard for Tom Elliott and Carlton if Tom gets in.


It is vital that Tom Elliott if he gets in - brings the cash with him so we can pay the AFL's filthy loan back and tell them to PIENE STO HAMOPISTO. :twisted: - THATS GO AND GET FLOWERED IN ENGLISH. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:26 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17238
You're right - she's clutching at straws with the Pagan statements - but remember she's trying to be Dan Brown and piece everything together before the next chapter. Pagan isn't going anywhere until the end of May 2007 at the earliest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
BIBI01 wrote:
why else would they push so hard to have pagan sacked?.


Because he's a shit coach with no idea, maybe?????

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:59 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
bluechucky wrote:
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I think if either party are willing to pay out Denis Pagan it will have massive appeal to the rank and file members...


I have to say you are incorrect here. The rank and file members generally side with Caro re: Pagan and think he's getting stitched by the club.


I must be mixing with the wrong rank and field members....most of the ones I talk to associate wooden spoons and lack of onfield success with Denis Pagan and want him out....they wouldnt know who Lorraine Diggins was for example.....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:04 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Orangewhip wrote:
It's a quandry. (Have to use the word QUANDRY on the Tuesday before Friday).

John Elliot rightfully wears a significant proportion of the blame for Carlton's demise and his return to the club as father of the president would be concerning...but from what I know of Tom, he is his own man, well-spoken, and articulate.

Considering our position, if Tom had the RIGHT backing, a SOLID plan communictaed to members and the media, he could be a tantilising and unifying choice.

He is an Elliot, John Elliot's son, a deeply Carlton dynasty...this would be likely to convince the old mob.

He is not John Elliot, he is Tom and he has a fresh plan based on his and the members intentions for the Blues winning premierships again...this may be enough to convince those wounded by his father's pestilance and desperate for positive change to run with him.

Oh quandry. Oh, go the mighty quandry.


I like it.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18076
BIBI01 wrote:
sure pagan has some responsibility but not sole responsibility.


So you want to retain him because he's only partially responsible?
It indicates how far we've slipped when we're happy to accept mediocrity.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:20 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
I'm sick of Pagan.
Imagine coming out in spite of the board to complain, ooh they wouldn't let me have ZANTUCK.... cry cry cry.
I know he was listening to Deano and me. And believe me, thats never good. Well at least listening to me.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:25 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
quana quana quandry!

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:27 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
I'm tiring of this new saviour every two weeks crap.

Until someone acrually puts their hand up and gets us sorted out I won't be getting excited.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:49 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19596
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
BIBI01 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
BIBI01 wrote:
seriously if these people think sacking the coaching is going to solve our on field problems they are sadly mistaken and not not the people I want running my club


Did I miss something?
Where did anyone say that sacking Pagan will solve all our on field problems? :?

AFAIC, its the first positive step in a mid term process.


sacking pagan has been one of fraser brown's main plays, not to mention the board tried to sack him

why else would they push so hard to have pagan sacked?
because they believe pagan is the reason for our poor onfield performances.

sure pagan has some responsibility but not sole responsibility.


8)

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17238
Quote:
Until someone actually puts their hand up and gets us sorted out I won't be getting excited.


Well now's the time to awaken Big Kev from his permanent slumber - get excited Deano - tonights meeting might not be the Christmas Coup I had forecast but there is NO doubt that the current administration is shaking in its boots...Smorgons boys in Moulton and Harrison will not solve any problems - they won't inject any new money and we'll just keep dangling by the strings controlled the big puppeteer in the AFL.

The faction behind any move by Tom Elliott will be made clear closer to the appropriate time - after all - has any legitimate contender for the 2008 U.S presidency announced that they're actually running - NO. You have to :

a) make sure the numbers are there
b) make sure the money is there
c) make sure you time your run right - no point going too early and letting doubts creep in once the initial excitement is over. If you were on the board - when would you want to call the AGM - ASAP or on the eve of the footy season proper when the fans get a taste of the '07 Blues and like what they see?

This will be the real deal. I'm a betting man and I'm almost certain that both a) and b) have been put in place. Now - I'm excited.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:07 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Deano Supremo wrote:
I'm tiring of this new saviour every two weeks crap.

Until someone acrually puts their hand up and gets us sorted out I won't be getting excited.


Agree..Less talking and more action is required......I would equate our board challenges to sightings of Elvis.....not much substance to either.
Its time these wannabes put up and stop jerking the supporters/members around....
I am proposing we get that Fijian general(Barney Banana) to organise the coup......he might actually be able to get something happening rather than just talking about it...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group