Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
JohnM wrote:
Hmmm...

From what I can see Goddard possesses the game's most valuable skill: the ability to kick the ball long and accurately to advantage on a regular basis.

From what I've seen on Livo, his greatest strength is his willingness to contest and have a dip.

Seriously, what has Livo shown you (other than a 'have a dip' mentality) that would cause you to rate him higher than pretty much everyone else in the football world?


The "have-a-dip", added with pretty good body strength (outmuscling Quentin Lynch is a pretty fair effort, as far as I'm concerned), and developing backman's smarts is why.

The black art of being a backman successfully is not something which is able to be picked up instantly, IMO. It's like ruck skills. Takes a few hard seasons for most to develop the combination of knowledge of the game, positioning, their opponent, their skills, their strength etc to get going.


Then how come you think Goddard should have been better in the backline when he has never played on a KPP player like McPharlin before??

Id just shoooosh about this if i were you cos im hearing digging noises..

:wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Synbad wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
JohnM wrote:
Hmmm...

From what I can see Goddard possesses the game's most valuable skill: the ability to kick the ball long and accurately to advantage on a regular basis.

From what I've seen on Livo, his greatest strength is his willingness to contest and have a dip.

Seriously, what has Livo shown you (other than a 'have a dip' mentality) that would cause you to rate him higher than pretty much everyone else in the football world?


The "have-a-dip", added with pretty good body strength (outmuscling Quentin Lynch is a pretty fair effort, as far as I'm concerned), and developing backman's smarts is why.

The black art of being a backman successfully is not something which is able to be picked up instantly, IMO. It's like ruck skills. Takes a few hard seasons for most to develop the combination of knowledge of the game, positioning, their opponent, their skills, their strength etc to get going.


Then how come you think Goddard should have been better in the backline when he has never played on a KPP player like McPharlin before??

Id just shoooosh about this if i were you cos im hearing digging noises..

:wink:


I think he's just not very good in any position, not just back, against McPharlin, or whoever.

And you should know, to get yourself out of a hole - DIG UP!

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18758
Location: threeohfivethree
Using Livo as a counterpoint to Goddard is interesting.

Players develop at different rates and the quality of the coaching they receive has to have a massive bearing on that (otherwise good coaches wouldn't command good dollars).

I'm convinced Livo (and all other high draft picks) should be given four years to show that they have what it takes to make it as a footballer. Very few players are the finished product at 20. Chris Judd is exceptional because he's the exception. If we hadn't been so bereft of tall defenders I would have delisted Livo at the end of this year and I think the club's probably of the same belief which is why they only renewed his contract for one year. It doesn't make the decision to keep him for those four years wrong. It means we're giving our younger players a chance to develop. Some will make it and some won't. I'm glad the club appears to take this view (unlike Collingwood re Braden Shaw).

At 18 you use a high pick because he's shown great talent. By 22 you can generally tell if a player's going to be worth your investment.

At 19, 20, 21 however I think it's best to suspend judgement. Goddard's in that bracket now. Luke Hodge was "a dud" according to many only 12-18 months ago. Is he "a dud" now?

Goddard deserves the same chance to prove he's going to be a great footballer as any other player regardless of his draft position. At the moment it looks like he might not be the complete player at times. Wow - what a surprise. He's 20.

Give him a couple of years good tuition and find him a position where he's comfortable and I think we'll see what he could be.


Last edited by GWS on Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
GWS wrote:
Using Livo as a counterpoint to Goddard is interesting.

Players develop at different rates and the quality of the coaching they receive has to have a massive bearing on that (otherwise good coaches wouldn't command good dollars).

I'm convinced Livo (and all other high draft picks) should be given four years to show that they have what it takes to make it as a footballer. Very few players are the finished product at 20. Chris Judd is exceptional because he's the exception. If we hadn't been so bereft of tall defenders I would have delisted Livo at the end of this year and I think the club's probably of the same belief which is why they only renewed his contract for one year. It doesn't make the decision to keep him for those four years wrong. It means we're giving our younger players a chance to develop. Some will make it and some won't. I'm glad the club appears to take this view (unlike Collingwood re Braden Shaw).

At 18 you use I high pick because he's shown great talent. By 22 you can generally tell if a player's going to be worth your investment.

At 19, 20, 21 however I think it's best to suspend judgement. Goddard's in that bracket now. Luke Hodge was "a dud" according to many only 12-18 months ago. Is he "a dud" now?

Goddard deserves the same chance to prove he's going to be a great footballer as any other player regardless of his draft position. At the moment it looks like he might not be the complete player at times. Wow - what a surprise. He's 20.

Give him a couple of years good tuition and find him a position where he's comfortable and I think we'll see what he could be.


Excellent points, GWS. I think the most telling bit is the bit you and I definitely agree on "A couple of years of good tuition"

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:27 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Kouta was about 21-22 back in 94 when he really started to come on, same age as Waite this year.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18758
Location: threeohfivethree
TheGame wrote:
Kouta was about 21-22 back in 94 when he really started to come on, same age as Waite this year.


And I remember people talking about him not long before that as "a great athlete but never going to make it as a footballer".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:36 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Ater the 94 finals I would have axed Ratten, lucky Parko knew better.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18758
Location: threeohfivethree
TheGame wrote:
Ater the 94 finals I would have axed Ratten, lucky Parko knew better.


Me too... :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
JohnM wrote:
His awareness is barely average and his disposal is terrible.


Only difference is Goddard has good disposal. In the awareness stakes though it's almost a dead-heat.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:44 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 13
jbee wrote:
Barney wrote:
First pick in the draft would be great, maybe we could get ourselves the next Goddard...on second thoughts, I'll take a win.


What about Wells, you don't want him Barney? We are actually talking about two picks.

I actually thought BJ played a good game last night. KK and Barney you can have Livo at full back who has goals kicked against him and can't kick a ball or you can have Goddard at full back who has goals kicked against him and kicks like a muel a very accurate muel.

Sometimes I wonder what the hell people are watching!
Well, with two picks we could take a Goddard and a Livo. My point is, we still aren't guaranteed a superstar and it takes a lot more than a couple of early draft picks to rebuild. The guy we take with pick 5 or whatever we end up with could quite likely end up being just as good as, or better than, the players taken earlier.

I don't think it is as black and white as people see it - of course the best way to get more talent on your list is through the draft, but there are so many variables I don't believe it is worth another wooden spoon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:28 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
why don't we have a fourm for all those who get along to TAC and then a forum for those that don't and a forum for those who live interstate and a forum for....

ignorance is a terrible thing

being omniprescient is the way to go.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
dannyboy wrote:
why don't we have a fourm for all those who get along to TAC and then a forum for those that don't and a forum for those who live interstate and a forum for....

ignorance is a terrible thing

being omniprescient is the way to go.

nah sorry dannyboy but you do go to exams being prepared dont you???

Otherwise you fail???

Unless you just have to write a poem ... or as Paul McCartney did.. 'love songs'.. of course ..whats wrong with silly love songs????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:47 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
If a bunch of guys sat around 20 years ago talking at length about watching a group of sweaty muscly 16 year old boys the cops would have been called, now no-one bats an eyelid.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Jarusa wrote:
If a bunch of guys sat around 20 years ago talking at length about watching a group of sweaty muscly 16 year old boys the cops would have been called, now no-one bats an eyelid.


Some people would have waited for the internet so they can check on their statistics...
...... they would have to wait a further 10 years ....then they would have some kind of meaningfulness in their lives. (twenty years ago).. it was toy soldiers before that....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.


Oh here we go, the old got to watch TAC and talk to scouts to know anything about football.

You're so obsessed with the TAC and excited about drafting kids and which kids should we draft that you've forgotten what the game is all about.

When in this thread did anyone mention the TAC, depth of the draft, any kid likely to be drafted this season?

I saw a discussion comparing Livo to Goddard and touched on guys 22-24 and how much time we give them....nothing about anyone in this year's draft.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.


Oh here we go, the old got to watch TAC and talk to scouts to know anything about football.

You're so obsessed with the TAC and excited about drafting kids and which kids should we draft that you've forgotten what the game is all about.

When in this thread did anyone mention the TAC, depth of the draft, any kid likely to be drafted this season?

I saw a discussion comparing Livo to Goddard and touched on guys 22-24 and how much time we give them....nothing about anyone in this year's draft.


Brad, collect your dunce cap and join the rest of us in the stupid corner.

Synbad is the all-seeing, all-knowing oracle of what's good for you: From your footy club through to your life.

Synbad, has that life of yours which you ordered been delivered yet?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:38 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.


Oh here we go, the old got to watch TAC and talk to scouts to know anything about football.

You're so obsessed with the TAC and excited about drafting kids and which kids should we draft that you've forgotten what the game is all about.

When in this thread did anyone mention the TAC, depth of the draft, any kid likely to be drafted this season?

I saw a discussion comparing Livo to Goddard and touched on guys 22-24 and how much time we give them....nothing about anyone in this year's draft.


When people think were going to pluck the next Jesaulenko out of our arses they are just that.. ignorant.!!!

and a horse is a horse ofcourse...except when its a mutant and a mule..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.


Oh here we go, the old got to watch TAC and talk to scouts to know anything about football.

You're so obsessed with the TAC and excited about drafting kids and which kids should we draft that you've forgotten what the game is all about.

When in this thread did anyone mention the TAC, depth of the draft, any kid likely to be drafted this season?

I saw a discussion comparing Livo to Goddard and touched on guys 22-24 and how much time we give them....nothing about anyone in this year's draft.


When people think were going to pluck the next Jesaulenko out of our arses they are just that.. ignorant.!!!

and a horse is a horse ofcourse...except when its a mutant and a mule..


How about using your knowledge gained watching TAC and talking to scout's and telling us something useful like if there are any potential Jeeza's in this year's draft.

We can all sit back and look over the history and tell each other yes Judd was drafted at #3, Fischer was drafted in the 70's.

You have a special gift to provide something useful and actually us about the people in the draft.

Head over to TalkingRecruitment and tell us who the Top 10 prospects are this year and a brief description of their potential and style of play. I wouldn't have a clue.

Tell us who we should draft under each scenario, Picks 1 & 2, 2 & 4, 5.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I wonder how many of you ever get along to the TAC......
Some of the stuff people think are outageous and downright ignorant.


Oh here we go, the old got to watch TAC and talk to scouts to know anything about football.

You're so obsessed with the TAC and excited about drafting kids and which kids should we draft that you've forgotten what the game is all about.

When in this thread did anyone mention the TAC, depth of the draft, any kid likely to be drafted this season?

I saw a discussion comparing Livo to Goddard and touched on guys 22-24 and how much time we give them....nothing about anyone in this year's draft.


When people think were going to pluck the next Jesaulenko out of our arses they are just that.. ignorant.!!!

and a horse is a horse ofcourse...except when its a mutant and a mule..


How about using your knowledge gained watching TAC and talking to scout's and telling us something useful like if there are any potential Jeeza's in this year's draft.

We can all sit back and look over the history and tell each other yes Judd was drafted at #3, Fischer was drafted in the 70's.

You have a special gift to provide something useful and actually us about the people in the draft.

Head over to TalkingRecruitment and tell us who the Top 10 prospects are this year and a brief description of their potential and style of play. I wouldn't have a clue.

Tell us who we should draft under each scenario, Picks 1 & 2, 2 & 4, 5.


Why would he do that Brad?

Synbad would be better off turning every thread into his priority pick wheelbarrow that he's been pushing since about round six.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CFC8795, Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group