Hypothetical question for you all: Would Pontings Pillagers/Gillys Galavanters be a show against the Invincibles or Chapellis Crew?
Some people say that quality players would be good in any era. Others say the players of today are better because they have broken most of the records of yesteryear. Which is correct? Neither really, cause it is only hypothetical unless you got access to a time machine.
I called on my old mate Nostradamus to solve the above question and whilst he was pondering that question I asked him to compare the 2001 team to the 2006 version.
His answers actually surprised me:
"Brizzy, it is a plain as the nose on your face. The current team are full time pros, they are bigger, fitter, stronger, quicker and more skillful. Their reaction times are streets in front of the oldies. They have better facilities, dieticians, more specialist coaching, more video sessions, varied training routines and a good balance of youth middle tier and experience. The future indicates that they will win many more games than they lose. In fact I'd say they will be a champion team for many years to come. As far as that other game is concerned....well, who really gives a @#$%&! about cricket? Go Blues"
