Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 2:46 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:16 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
I like Fish!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:48 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
Fish was my sole highlight from last year - he turned my legs to jelly. Fish sharking packs while others were floundering - I had a whale of a time watching him flying. Fish cod be anything - he's really helping this club tuna round

* mumbles apologies and leaves *


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:25 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
HTP wrote:
my sole highlight


8)

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:38 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
HTP wrote:
Fish was my sole highlight from last year - he turned my legs to jelly. Fish sharking packs while others were floundering - I had a whale of a time watching him flying. Fish cod be anything - he's really helping this club tuna round

* mumbles apologies and leaves *


Hook, line and sinker. :lol:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:45 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6474
Fisher reads the play exceptionally well.This part of his game is underated.

His weakness is the depth of his kicking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:55 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
And and...........

in the morning....the sun rises from the east..........
and then sets in the WEST.........!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
All I have to do is watch Fish play, think about what we got him for, when we got him - and I just smile.

As for Waite, see my sig.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:23 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Re: Longmuir......not sure of his present status or if he is ElectricB's marked man for no senior games this year but I would try him down back in a Ang Christou type role off half back. He is on the list and like any player deserves some development time put into him.
He isnt physical but either was Ang, he could take some good marks across half back and maybe develop his game a bit more....his skill level is ok and while I have reservations about his ability to take a hard bump i think we have nothing to lose....Teague and McGrath are handy players but dont give you much drive and Longmuir could be a handy target at kick ins...


re: Jarrod Waite....like his game but doesnt have the engine for onball work and lacks a yard.....I would try him at CHB...I know he has been there before and not impressed but I would persist with him....good players down the spine make for a good team....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Ang was taller than Longmuir and could pinch hit as a KPP defender (though he never really had to).

As for Waite, he would excell in the middle, we won't need him in a KPP spot soon :)

He'll get his engine up to scratch, the wheels are sensational for his size.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
jimmae wrote:
Ang was taller than Longmuir and could pinch hit as a KPP defender (though he never really had to).

As for Waite, he would excell in the middle, we won't need him in a KPP spot soon :)

He'll get his engine up to scratch, the wheels are sensational for his size.


Ang was taller than Longmuir but unlike Fisher for example played smaller and wasnt great in the air and maybe his crook back was from us sending him out to pinch hit on bigger stronger players...Angs go was providing drive, getting on his own and then woofing it down to Kouta or Sticks..
Longmuir plays taller and his strength is being able to outmark slightly taller opponents...
I just think Pagan and the coaching staff need to get a bit more lateral in their thinking..Lance to CHB is about as lateral as we have got on a regular basis.......I liken Waite to Pavlich...Pavlich started at CHB to do his apprenticeship and then went and had some time on the ball and is now down forward...I think Waite should do the same but I am less enthusiastic
about having him on the ball as I dont think he is as mobile as Pavlich ...I hope he proves me wrong and you right Jimmae...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:03 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24660
Location: Kaloyasena
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
Ang was taller than Longmuir but unlike Fisher for example played smaller and wasnt great in the air and maybe his crook back was from us sending him out to pinch hit on bigger stronger players...Angs go was providing drive, getting on his own and then woofing it down to Kouta or Sticks....



Ang (at 192cm) is in fact 1 cm taller than his great mate Kouta, although you would never know it from his aerial work, never noted for his overhead marking - became reasonably efficient with spoil - but I wouldn't have wanted to stake my life on his efforts.

As Elwood correctly states his go was picking up the 3rd or 4th forward and providing the link up option and running the ball out of the half back line and with a gigantic woof would more often than not land just beyond the CHF position where Sticks would either mark it or knock it to our crumbers.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
When comparing mobility between Pavlich and Waite, you're only guessing that Waite isn't as mobile. Waite is a mobile big man, with the ability to play wing.

I remember those two chasing a misdirected kick on the wing one time, and I could see that Waite would have the nod on that one (although a close call), and as for jumping, they are really close, with Waite being a bit more flexible once in the air adjusting for change of direction, but I would say that Pavlich is a better kick either foot.

Waite is mobile.


As for the perception that Ange was never noted for his aerial marking, doesn't mean he wasn't a good overhead mark. He proved to be a very good mark in 1994-1995. He took lots of marks in front of packs, middle and third man up. Sure he required for a different role, as mentioned, because he had pace, and was a very good kick to position. Later on, post back injury (or rather comeback with a suspect back) he become a spoiler as he lost his leap and therefore ability to consistently get two hands on the ball in a pack situation, and he wasn't standing in front of packs anymore.

The point I want to reflect on moreso about Ange is that he may not have had the right body type to put himself in those precarious marking positions and handle the bigger bodies, hence the back problem. He did not possess a KPP's body type.

It does take a certain bodytype to play KPP.

As for Longmuir, no comment, but very interested in TCers discussion on him. What's his pace like? He could make a BP ossibly if he has more pace than McGrath. Don't get me wrong, McGrath's position in my books is safe at this stage...maybe not come year's end.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
bondiblue wrote:
When comparing mobility between Pavlich and Waite, you're only guessing that Waite isn't as mobile. Waite is a mobile big man, with the ability to play wing.

I remember those two chasing a misdirected kick on the wing one time, and I could see that Waite would have the nod on that one (although a close call), and as for jumping, they are really close, with Waite being a bit more flexible once in the air adjusting for change of direction, but I would say that Pavlich is a better kick either foot.

Waite is mobile.


As for the perception that Ange was never noted for his aerial marking, doesn't mean he wasn't a good overhead mark. He proved to be a very good mark in 1994-1995. He took lots of marks in front of packs, middle and third man up. Sure he required for a different role, as mentioned, because he had pace, and was a very good kick to position. Later on, post back injury (or rather comeback with a suspect back) he become a spoiler as he lost his leap and therefore ability to consistently get two hands on the ball in a pack situation, and he wasn't standing in front of packs anymore.

The point I want to reflect on moreso about Ange is that he may not have had the right body type to put himself in those precarious marking positions and handle the bigger bodies, hence the back problem. He did not possess a KPP's body type.

It does take a certain bodytype to play KPP.

As for Longmuir, no comment, but very interested in TCers discussion on him. What's his pace like? He could make a BP ossibly if he has more pace than McGrath. Don't get me wrong, McGrath's position in my books is safe at this stage...maybe not come year's end.



I wouldnt call it guessing..I would suggest Pavlich was very successful as a on baller during his time there and had both the mobility and engine which was superior to Jarrod Waite.....several time last season Waite was left floundering when chasing players.....you put him in the middle and have him on either Judd , Cousins or Kerr for example becuase thats who he would get for example vs West Coast..that could get ugly......

Marking wise I dont disagree...Pavlich gets a lot his marks on the lead and uncontested, his duel with the underated Matthew Egan from Geelong was worth watching in the NAB cup semi final..I though Egan had him covered in the body on body stuff but Pavlich was too quick and smart on the lead...Waite does throw himself around more in markiing contests and is probably better value...kicking wise...Pavlich has the edge in general field kicking and has nice skills for a player of his size but dont rate Pavlich that highly in front of goal..misses plenty and misses them under pressure and thats why he isnt at the same level as say Jonothan Brown or James Hird...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
Eddie Betts is a very good snapper....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
what's that got to do with the price of fish? 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
Well, you see, I originally thought he would flounder this early in his career...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fisher
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:58 am
Posts: 7
showbag wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Dont forget Longmuir.He also is a beauty in the air.


Bravo Mick...i think Longmuir is dealt with harshly on this board. I hope we get to see a fit Longmuir given opportuities this year.


Longmuir was a failure at Melbourne, a failure in the west and he will be a failure at Carlton, he cannot play to this level, lets move on and look forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
Well put Elwood.

I can't dispute a word of what you had to say...including the floundering part (although the whole team seemed to have that disease last year).


My point really is to suggest that Waite is mobile for a big man, and with an improvement in stamina, and a bit of midfield coaching he would be capable of playing there effectively.

I have no hesitation in suggesting that whilst Judd, Cousins and Kerr do prove a challenge for all comers in the midfield, Waite would have marking as an advantage over them, and from there being as potent as a linkman, but in a different way.

Great game footy. It takes all types to play it.

Thanks for your succinct and spot on response Elwood.

I wish your team ALL the luck in 2006.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fisher
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18081
Earl_of_twirl wrote:
Longmuir was a failure at Melbourne,


Tough call Earl.
Melbourne were keen to retain Troy but he wanted to return home.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:14 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5824
Location: home
Andain wrote:
Fisher was great at the end of last year. Really gave our forward line another dimension. However doesn't anyone else question his official height of 192cm? He's seems to me to be a few centimetres smaller than that.. around 189-188 maybe.


Is easily 192, I reackon a little taller than that, have stood next to him and he is clearly taller than me. I'm 190 ish. Your right though doesn't look anywhere near as big on the ground, when he gets some more bulk on in a few years he will look it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 83 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group