ThePrez wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
mikkey wrote:
http://www.theage.com.au/realfooty/news/afl/smorgon-steels-himself-for-blues-job/2006/04/17/1145126055518.htmlQuote:
Confirming that all contracts put in place during Collins' regime would be honoured, Smorgon ruled out a return to playing home games at Princes Park but would not rule out the Blues selling matches interstate.
Oh, goodie....

Carlton are already playing 4-5 games per season interstate.
What's the problem with selling a match interstate and travelling "Away" less? It adds up to the same thing. There have been so many comments about Carlton needing to get on the front foot and promote the Club interstate, yet when it's mooted, all you can hear is the wailing and complaining from Melbourne supporters.
If we want Carlton to grow into a truly national "brand", things like this need to be considered and debated rationally.
thats a bit rich mate.
and pretty funny
considering your stance on the alternative strip.

for what its worth i dont have any issue with it, aslong as we play less interstate games.
i.e. we play west coast, sydney, adelaide one year, and sell three home games to canberra as an example.
then the following year we play freo, brisbane, port and three home games to canberra
but not if it means we play 5 interstate teams then a further 3 home games away
would think that is a great idea, and if it can guarantee us 1.5 mill for the 3 games a year im all for it.
also, membership prices needs to be reduced due to having less games in melbourne
aslo, the club needs to ensure that the games will be on free to air tv ensuring we get further coverage and better sponsorship for it
My stance on an alternative strip?
I think you'll find that I've accepted the possibility of an alternative strip, however, unlike slavish EPL fanatics, I don't think it should be a lay down misére for every away match.
Besides, who was the one quoted in
The Age about the alternative jumper? And what were those words? And what was the design that person was talking about?
If games are sold interstate, then the AFL will reduce interstate away trips. So Melbourne people will still get to see the 16-17 matches every season in Melbourne, as opposed to Sydney fans who see 1 match every 3 to 4 years. Even Adelaide fans get Carlton every year at least once, and Perth people get us twice, for the last umpteen years running.
Just as I've been pragmatic about my approach to the alternative jumper, I think a lot of Melbourne fans have to be pragmatic about the concept of selling matches interstate, and try and look at the situation and concept as an opportunity for the Club, not as a way to "steal" matches off you poor deprived Melbourne-ites.
I think selling the match in Sydney against Sydney would be a winner, both in terms of gate takings, incentives, base support in Sydney going up and increased memberships here from that etc.
As Slammin Sam says: You know it makes sense.