dannyboy wrote:
'Development being hit and miss is the Pagan way.... too many variables... won't care... make a half-arsed effort without any apparent planning. ' What are you basing this on Tyrant?
Evidence perceived by me:
- Some players are given more time than others
- Some players are given more time in a variety match situations
- Some players are fixtures in the side, while others are a week in and a week out, and are dropped in favour of crappy re-treads
Not every player seems to have a plan.... or, if they do, some of them are just bad plans or not working.
Compare to Hawthorn, where Clarkson believes in all his kids and gives them a variety of opportunities, over time.
How many re-treads has Clarkson recruited to get in the way of his kids? Guerra is the only one that springs to mind. He also doesn't hang on to problematic players when he has kids to push up into those roles.
A coach who cared about development of a team for long-term success would take all this into account.
A guy like Davies, for example, got a very good run at the start of last season..... was up and down.... but was dropped and not to return. why? was it bad attitude? And he was parked in a forward pocket and not given a variety of opportunities. Did Pagan think he could make it and then decide he couldn't???? If so, why wasn't Davies delisted?? Or is Pagan's attitude to development that you've got to earn it?? Thats rubbish and haphazard. Why was Johnson or Chambers picked for on-ball roles last year when Davies could have been given a chance there? Perhaps Davies isn't capable of that in Denis' opinion... thats fine... what about in defence? nope, never saw him there either. So, was the plan that Davies had to kick X goals a game up forward to keep his spot.... or that Pagan just wouldn't tolerate poor kicking for goal. Or maybe Pagan isn't tolerant of errors... but then, what about DeLuca???
In a shit team where every spot is being rebuilt, every kid drafted should have a long-term plan.... learning, training, and doing.
evidently, they dont.
There were enough barely capable triers on the list before the re-treads came onboard. Wiggins, Sporn, Davies et.al....... why not give them the chances McGrath and Bannister got and see if some of the errors couldn't be worked out of them......
Not every player can be developed, but every player should be given the chance.