Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 10:22 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 47  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
so Eade should trade Cooney, get a pick and choose someone who suits his gameplan?


I'm not big on trading - I think you have to learn to dance with what you brung

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
so eade should change his gameplan, or just sacrifice the undoubtable talent that is Cooney for his gameplan?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
'Development being hit and miss is the Pagan way.... too many variables... won't care... make a half-arsed effort without any apparent planning. ' What are you basing this on Tyrant?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Walker, for all his awesome awesome good qualities and form, isn't anywhere near as developed a player as Cooney. Sorry jimmae.... thats just not right. Cooney has ripped games apart..... he's off the boil a bit this year, but he's about an inch away from being a marquee player.... and Walker is couple extra inches off.... sure enough, he is about a year younger

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19607
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Does Pagan develop ruckmen like other coaches?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
so eade should change his gameplan, or just sacrifice the undoubtable talent that is Cooney for his gameplan?


No Cooney had a couple of bad games he will adjust he is very talented.

Eades plan is making the best of what he has and that is speed - he has no talls so he has looked at the rule changes and adjusted their playing style to suit his playing group - All be it Cooney hasn't adapted yet.

Only problem is Craig has studied what he does and made them look ordinary on the weekend . Crows had some big outs on the weekend all be it the dogs were suffering a let down affect from the cats game.
The crows were getable but the dogs were got .

they look the goods so far this year but there is still a long way to go

Dogs plan wont hold up against teams like sydney and the crows

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Tyrant - take Delidio and Tambling...Does that mean Wallace has developed delidio well but not tambling?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
So Eade was outcoached by Craig?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
dannyboy wrote:
'Development being hit and miss is the Pagan way.... too many variables... won't care... make a half-arsed effort without any apparent planning. ' What are you basing this on Tyrant?


Evidence perceived by me:
- Some players are given more time than others
- Some players are given more time in a variety match situations
- Some players are fixtures in the side, while others are a week in and a week out, and are dropped in favour of crappy re-treads

Not every player seems to have a plan.... or, if they do, some of them are just bad plans or not working.

Compare to Hawthorn, where Clarkson believes in all his kids and gives them a variety of opportunities, over time.

How many re-treads has Clarkson recruited to get in the way of his kids? Guerra is the only one that springs to mind. He also doesn't hang on to problematic players when he has kids to push up into those roles.

A coach who cared about development of a team for long-term success would take all this into account.

A guy like Davies, for example, got a very good run at the start of last season..... was up and down.... but was dropped and not to return. why? was it bad attitude? And he was parked in a forward pocket and not given a variety of opportunities. Did Pagan think he could make it and then decide he couldn't???? If so, why wasn't Davies delisted?? Or is Pagan's attitude to development that you've got to earn it?? Thats rubbish and haphazard. Why was Johnson or Chambers picked for on-ball roles last year when Davies could have been given a chance there? Perhaps Davies isn't capable of that in Denis' opinion... thats fine... what about in defence? nope, never saw him there either. So, was the plan that Davies had to kick X goals a game up forward to keep his spot.... or that Pagan just wouldn't tolerate poor kicking for goal. Or maybe Pagan isn't tolerant of errors... but then, what about DeLuca???

In a shit team where every spot is being rebuilt, every kid drafted should have a long-term plan.... learning, training, and doing.

evidently, they dont.

There were enough barely capable triers on the list before the re-treads came onboard. Wiggins, Sporn, Davies et.al....... why not give them the chances McGrath and Bannister got and see if some of the errors couldn't be worked out of them......

Not every player can be developed, but every player should be given the chance.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
So Eade was outcoached by Craig?


In a nut shell -Yes

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:55 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
The Tyrant wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
'Development being hit and miss is the Pagan way.... too many variables... won't care... make a half-arsed effort without any apparent planning. ' What are you basing this on Tyrant?


Evidence perceived by me:
- Some players are given more time than others
- Some players are given more time in a variety match situations
- Some players are fixtures in the side, while others are a week in and a week out, and are dropped in favour of crappy re-treads

Not every player seems to have a plan.... or, if they do, some of them are just bad plans or not working.

Compare to Hawthorn, where Clarkson believes in all his kids and gives them a variety of opportunities, over time.

How many re-treads has Clarkson recruited to get in the way of his kids? Guerra is the only one that springs to mind. He also doesn't hang on to problematic players when he has kids to push up into those roles.

A coach who cared about development of a team for long-term success would take all this into account.

A guy like Davies, for example, got a very good run at the start of last season..... was up and down.... but was dropped and not to return. why? was it bad attitude? And he was parked in a forward pocket and not given a variety of opportunities. Did Pagan think he could make it and then decide he couldn't???? If so, why wasn't Davies delisted?? Or is Pagan's attitude to development that you've got to earn it?? Thats rubbish and haphazard. Why was Johnson or Chambers picked for on-ball roles last year when Davies could have been given a chance there? Perhaps Davies isn't capable of that in Denis' opinion... thats fine... what about in defence? nope, never saw him there either. So, was the plan that Davies had to kick X goals a game up forward to keep his spot.... or that Pagan just wouldn't tolerate poor kicking for goal. Or maybe Pagan isn't tolerant of errors... but then, what about DeLuca???

In a shit team where every spot is being rebuilt, every kid drafted should have a long-term plan.... learning, training, and doing.

evidently, they dont.

There were enough barely capable triers on the list before the re-treads came onboard. Wiggins, Sporn, Davies et.al....... why not give them the chances McGrath and Bannister got and see if some of the errors couldn't be worked out of them......

Not every player can be developed, but every player should be given the chance.


thats nearly as good as BV Post :lol:

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
dannyboy wrote:
Tyrant - take Delidio and Tambling...Does that mean Wallace has developed delidio well but not tambling?


danny, the proof isn't in output... especially not when the players are 19 and one has had injuries.

Output is only the proof after 3-4-5 seasons in the league.

Lesser examples would be Shirley, Doughty, Skipworth at Adelaide...... Clarke, Sewell, Ladson etc etc etc..... our equivalent of those players are Wiggins, Davies and Sporn.

A long way off...... now, you can argue "but they had more skill to begin with"... maybe so.... but its interesting what a run of games in controlled situations does for a kid who shows enough aptitude to deserve it.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:03 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
na eade's stuffed Cooney up comepletely, the kid's going backwards - just ask SB - no wait, that's only if it's Pagan..... 8)


Struggling a little bit at the moment with the bulldogs gameplan and there quick movement of the ball - doesn't suit him

Reminds me a lot of Lance when he was young

I am sure he will adjust - he was terrific last year


The bulldogs are playing exactly the same football now that they played last year. They moved the ball quickly last year and they move the ball quickly now :roll:
Cooney struggling has got nothing to do with the gameplan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:20 am
Posts: 1200
Location: Adelaide
Cooney was probably the Bulldogs best against the Crows.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
or Denis has made decisions about who are bit players and who are not - much Like Clarkson has only Clarkson has the benefit of far more top end picks)

So Davies is a bit player, as is Wiggo.

and Denis may be pressured by a Board whereas Clarkson was obviously told you've got x amount of time and we are with you 100% this way.

Has Denis got this support? Without it he may always being compromised.

But we are guessing.

I know this much. A player Denius takes on board - Walker, Murphy, T-Bird, Simmo, Carrots, AB, (JR?) De Luca (arhhhh) gets his support.

Is this not the case for any coach? Do they not make calls on players?

Denis cannot drop every player off the list, so he moves through the list, year by year. Eg I expect another 6 or 7 to go this year. How many of these are players brought to the club by Denis & co for high draft picks? That's the real means of judging success i reckon.

In the past we gave tons of good picks away for blokes that are not here. that kills a club.

Now we are devloping our own liost - 6 or 7 a year - 3/4 certainities, 1 or 2 smokies. So say 5 years of drafting Denis will have constructed his list.

Trade your Lance's/Fev's/ Kouta's (though we could not) and get an extra 4 almost certainty picks (ala Hawks/ Synbad's excellent development method) and you might drop this back a whole year to 4. 4/5 years of picks and development and then you should see results. By the 7th year you should be playing finals with a real chance of taking out the flag.

Cannot see any side doing it faster than that. Does anyone know of a side that has.

That is a different method to the flag every say 5 year method that may work for a while (Carlton, Bombers) but which will eventually deplete your list and so you must start again.

This is all guesswork, but its interesting.

Note with the Hawks too that the rebuilding did not begin with Clarkson (Hodge - No 1 pick? - and others were before him)


Carlton's chance to start this ealier than Denis was the year of the big three picks.

Livo
Sporn
Wiggo

I think we [REDACTED] up big time there.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
na eade's stuffed Cooney up comepletely, the kid's going backwards - just ask SB - no wait, that's only if it's Pagan..... 8)


Struggling a little bit at the moment with the bulldogs gameplan and there quick movement of the ball - doesn't suit him

Reminds me a lot of Lance when he was young

I am sure he will adjust - he was terrific last year


The bulldogs are playing exactly the same football now that they played last year. They moved the ball quickly last year and they move the ball quickly now :roll:
Cooney struggling has got nothing to do with the gameplan.


buldogs adopted this style of play towards the end of last year and have worked on it and the new rules over the summer. They weren't playing like this early last year

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:15 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
dannyboy wrote:
Carlton's chance to start this ealier than Denis was the year of the big three picks.

Livo
Sporn
Wiggo

I think we F@%&#! up big time there.


I've said it once and I'll say it again that draft has more to do with where we are now as a club than any other single thing. If anyone can show me a club that has had 3 picks in the first 15 picks of draft and come up with our result I would be staggered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
dannyboy, brilliant stuff in this thread, really brilliant!





_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: murraycray and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group