Blue Vain wrote:
What are your expectations for a coach?
IMHO The ideal coach should identify and implement a philosophy which suits the circumstances of the club and be consistent with it.
There are varying interested parties with varying agendas but a strong coach will stick to his guns.
In my opinion, a development coach is our perfect fit.
Wins are nice and consistent form from senior players is great but development and education of our kids is crucial.
I fear our kids have been severely compromised in their development.
The right to make decisions, be creative and exposed to a multi facetted game style walked out the door the day Pagan walked in.
In his first pre season, Pagan totally reprogrammed the players to play a "direct, efficient, collision brand of football"
If a player changed direction in the backline, he stopped them, if a player handballed outside the corridor to a running player, he stopped them. If a player kicked short to a leading forward, he stopped them.
He removed any decision making from the players.
For the first 2 years we played a regimented, low possession game of football that intentionally stifled creativity.
We are now suffering the consequences.
Pagan has finally realised that a significant change of gamestyle is required but the players are not conditioned to adapt.
They struggle with decision making. They lack creative impulses.
You cant stifle a players offensive development and then flick it on a like a light switch.
We bemoan our kick out strategies. We get frustrated when players make foolish decisions.
Where is the development?
Go watch our players train. They are totally restructuring a game style which they had drummed in to them for 2 years.
Whilst we are totally restructuring, other teams are fine tuning.
We spend little time on kick outs and set plays.
We're too busy trying to catch up with the basics.
When we do work on set plays, we are trying to devise our own kickouts. We dont have time to structure up for our opponents kickouts.
There isnt enough time.
This stuff should have been part of their development since 2003.
Instead we have totally reprogrammed the way our players think and play football and then tried to change them back.
There"s been no opportunity to work on any intricacies.
I know we have parents of players who read this site and I dont mean to offend but if my son played for Carlton, I'd be filthy.
As far as I'm concerned, his development has been compromised and stunted.
Whilst Adam Cooney is immersing himself in the encyclopedia of football, our youngsters are being offered the cat in the hat.
Our training is second rate. It has nothing to do with facilities. It's about intellectual stimulation.
Denis Pagan does drills with 6 backs playing on 6 forwards.
How often does that happen in a game?
Watch Barry Mitchell train the Bullants and 4 backs play on 2 forwards. The midfielders are required to improvise, think their way through an adverse situation and make decisions.
Can they spot a forward who is outnumbered? Can those forwards make space for each other?
That is indicative of true match conditions.
That is development.
Development is about making the most of the time available. Offering as much relevant information to players to accelerate their development.
The damage to our players isnt just about today. It's not about yesterday.
It's about realising how much development our players are missing and preventing it happening tomorrow.
BV - always interested to read your posts, enjoy your observations and opinions. In light of what you have said above, I would be really interested to know how much if any training you see of other clubs, and how you rate / compare their drills versus ours.