Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 10:22 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 47  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:29 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Gotta go with Sydney here, dannyboy... I rather dismissive post to a complex issue that glossed over the subtleties of the concept.

the issue isn't that Wiggins, Sporn and Davies is shit and therefore Pagan can't develop. Those 3 I was using as examples of Pagan's "haphazard" development strategies. All incongruous and ultimately unproductive. No development plan.

don't forget about the subtleties, Danny... thats where the flavour is

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Mate, try in your next performance review at work to say "well, I performed well, because I made 10 mistakes and Bob made 15"

doesn't wash mate

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21665
Location: North of the border
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Year but Brittains win/loss record at Carltons is better than Denis .

Surely jbee you cant be happy where we are at we are staring down a 10 goal belting off the pies this week followed by probably a 6-8 goal loss to the bombers and then face the saints who will probably belt us by 100 +

did Britts bring in mott- Angwin - Norman - Harford - Morrell - Johnson - Clarke - Martyn - Bannister- Deluca - Bryan - etc etc etc

Pagans recruiting record is no beteer than Brittain and brittain never had access to top draft picks as we we higher up the ladder - How many Prioty pick did Brittain have

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:40 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
The Tyrant wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Gotta go with Sydney here, dannyboy... I rather dismissive post to a complex issue that glossed over the subtleties of the concept.

the issue isn't that Wiggins, Sporn and Davies is shit and therefore Pagan can't develop. Those 3 I was using as examples of Pagan's "haphazard" development strategies. All incongruous and ultimately unproductive. No development plan.


Far too great a supposition being made with respect to these three players and Pagan's supposed player development abilities IMO.

dannyboy I think was merely making this point using Brittain as the 'example' instead of Pagan to show up the folly of the argument.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Sydney Blue wrote:
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =






Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Year but Brittains win/loss record at Carltons is better than Denis .

Surely jbee you cant be happy where we are at we are staring down a 10 goal belting off the pies this week followed by probably a 6-8 goal loss to the bombers and then face the saints who will probably belt us by 100 +

did Britts bring in mott- Angwin - Norman - Harford - Morrell - Johnson - Clarke - Martyn - Bannister- Deluca - Bryan - etc etc etc

Pagans recruiting record is no beteer than Brittain and brittain never had access to top draft picks as we we higher up the ladder - How many Prioty pick did Brittain have


Angwin and Norman were not bought in by Pagan.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19607
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Jarusa wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =






Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Year but Brittains win/loss record at Carltons is better than Denis .

Surely jbee you cant be happy where we are at we are staring down a 10 goal belting off the pies this week followed by probably a 6-8 goal loss to the bombers and then face the saints who will probably belt us by 100 +

did Britts bring in mott- Angwin - Norman - Harford - Morrell - Johnson - Clarke - Martyn - Bannister- Deluca - Bryan - etc etc etc

Pagans recruiting record is no beteer than Brittain and brittain never had access to top draft picks as we we higher up the ladder - How many Prioty pick did Brittain have


Angwin and Norman were not bought in by Pagan.


Who bought them in?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:52 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
Sydney Blue wrote:
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Year but Brittains win/loss record at Carltons is better than Denis .

Surely jbee you cant be happy where we are at we are staring down a 10 goal belting off the pies this week followed by probably a 6-8 goal loss to the bombers and then face the saints who will probably belt us by 100 +

did Britts bring in mott- Angwin - Norman - Harford - Morrell - Johnson - Clarke - Martyn - Bannister- Deluca - Bryan - etc etc etc

Pagans recruiting record is no beteer than Brittain and brittain never had access to top draft picks as we we higher up the ladder - How many Prioty pick did Brittain have


Brittain had picks 3 , 11 and 15 in one year.
Brittain did not have access to priority picks I agree and Denis has had access to priority picks I agree.
Denis's priority picks are Walker and Murphy. Do you have a problem with those two players?
In the long term our list now is in better shape than it was when Britts left which has more to do with Elliott/Parkin recruiting philosophy than Britts himself. In the end Denis will most likely not benefit from what is being done now. It will be the next coach that will get the benefit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
Effes wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =






Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Year but Brittains win/loss record at Carltons is better than Denis .

Surely jbee you cant be happy where we are at we are staring down a 10 goal belting off the pies this week followed by probably a 6-8 goal loss to the bombers and then face the saints who will probably belt us by 100 +

did Britts bring in mott- Angwin - Norman - Harford - Morrell - Johnson - Clarke - Martyn - Bannister- Deluca - Bryan - etc etc etc

Pagans recruiting record is no beteer than Brittain and brittain never had access to top draft picks as we we higher up the ladder - How many Prioty pick did Brittain have


Angwin and Norman were not bought in by Pagan.


Who bought them in?


THE POLICE and THEY TOOK THEM AWAY :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:09 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
The Tyrant wrote:
jbee wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so eade's changing /developing his gameplan!!!! :shock:

your proof T is in the Livo/Sporn/Wiggo area. All 3 have had chances. Perhaps all 3 were ruined by Brittain before Denis ever arrived?


Danny that is the worst post I have ever seen you put up - these guys were barely 20 when Denis arrived there is no possible way Brittain ruined there careers . If they were playing under Denis the chances were that would not even of had a senoir game .

we are quick to criticise thomas with Goddard and co but fail to look in our own back yard =


Did Britts decide to trade Massie for Eccles?
Did Britts give up on Fevola?
Did Britts take Fletcher and Pickering to the Tigers with him?
Did Britts recruit Lindsay Smith to Carlton after Denis gave him the flick at the Roos?
These are just the ones that roll off the top of my head.


Mate, try in your next performance review at work to say "well, I performed well, because I made 10 mistakes and Bob made 15"

doesn't wash mate


Particularly if I was an air traffic contoller :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
2-things

1) I hope no one assumes I'm saying Wiggins, Sporn and Davies would be gun players under another coach... My point is rather that they are examples of having little to no development plan in place, and will now be delisted. I don't know what they could have been with development plans, but we know what they are without them

2) The list IS better now than under Brittain (agree with jbee... wonders never cease!) but thats what makes the issue of whether Pagan is right or not even more important now, I reckon. With so many dynamite young players on the list its crucial that they are developed properly, and with some forethought. My fear is that someone like Bower will sit in the 2s for 3 years while Saddington (an average re-tread) keeps getting picked ahead of him.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Davies was contracted for two years, and we'd have to pay him out AND it goes under the cap for the years he was meant to receive the money. That's why we kept him.

They figure, take the hit, or see if we still might get something out of a young kid. They kept him, because they can't pay him out. :|

Dynamite players on the list? You're undervaluing Pagan and overvaluing our stocks. The ones coming in are part of our future for sure but you make it sound Pagan has a premiership 22 and he's pissing it against a wall. Don't be daft.


Last edited by jimmae on Tue May 02, 2006 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
jbee wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
Carlton's chance to start this ealier than Denis was the year of the big three picks.

Livo
Sporn
Wiggo

I think we F@%&#! up big time there.


I've said it once and I'll say it again that draft has more to do with where we are now as a club than any other single thing. If anyone can show me a club that has had 3 picks in the first 15 picks of draft and come up with our result I would be staggered.


I think me, Benny and the Sheik of CSC fame were telling everyone that the day after the draft.....when you get told that wingman are growing into CHB's you have to be concerned..try 0/6 for that draft if Livo, Wiggo dont come up this season.....that bites you 5 years down the track when those players or at least half should be decent contributors....
Not that the draft of 2000 failures is an indication of Pagans progress...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
jimmae wrote:
Davies was contracted for two years, and we'd have to pay him out AND it goes under the cap for the years he was meant to receive the money. That's why we kept him.

They figure, take the hit, or see if we still might get something out of a young kid. They kept him, because they can't pay him out. :|


Another string of poor decisions by the Blues at contract time.... it wasn't just him either. Bannister, Chambers, Longmuir.... all showed @#$%&! nothing in 2005 but had 2 year contracts so woops! better keep them and only have 4 draft picks and leave Jesse Smith on the rookie list and de-list Becker! Thats good planning! Better to leave all the chaf on the list, finish last in 2006 and de-list 10 players and load up in the superdraft!

shocking... shocking planning and list management (ie DEVELOPMENT!!!)

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:29 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
jbee wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
Carlton's chance to start this ealier than Denis was the year of the big three picks.

Livo
Sporn
Wiggo

I think we F@%&#! up big time there.


I've said it once and I'll say it again that draft has more to do with where we are now as a club than any other single thing. If anyone can show me a club that has had 3 picks in the first 15 picks of draft and come up with our result I would be staggered.


I think me, Benny and the Sheik of CSC fame were telling everyone that the day after the draft.....when you get told that wingman are growing into CHB's you have to be concerned..try 0/6 for that draft if Livo, Wiggo dont come up this season.....that bites you 5 years down the track when those players or at least half should be decent contributors....
Not that the draft of 2000 failures is an indication of Pagans progress...


He is being blamed for it now, plus the Claytons draft "the draft you have when you don't have a draft". The worst thing Denis has done is win 10 games in a season when we should have won 4.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:35 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
The Tyrant wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Better to leave all the chaf on the list, finish last in 2006 and de-list 10 players and load up in the superdraft!

shocking... shocking planning and list management (ie DEVELOPMENT!!!)


Isn't that good planning? Freemantle did not even bother using pick 49 in last years draft. If a pick 49 kid in the 2005 draft is not going to be rated in the top 150 in the 2006 draft why would you bother trying to develop him? Wait until the super draft I say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
The Tyrant wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Davies was contracted for two years, and we'd have to pay him out AND it goes under the cap for the years he was meant to receive the money. That's why we kept him.

They figure, take the hit, or see if we still might get something out of a young kid. They kept him, because they can't pay him out. :|


Another string of poor decisions by the Blues at contract time.... it wasn't just him either. Bannister, Chambers, Longmuir.... all showed F@%&#! nothing in 2005 but had 2 year contracts so woops! better keep them and only have 4 draft picks and leave Jesse Smith on the rookie list and de-list Becker! Thats good planning! Better to leave all the chaf on the list, finish last in 2006 and de-list 10 players and load up in the superdraft!

shocking... shocking planning and list management (ie DEVELOPMENT!!!)

The only things I'm angry about in the last 5 drafts are this:

Penalties in 2002 & 2003
Trading away top picks in 2001
The sheer number of re-treads selected in 2003.

Even then I would have only exercised one pick given we traded our third rounder for Scotland. Couldn't really trade Beaumont for anything other than players so that left us very hamstrung. Likewise Corey, looks like we could have scored a second rounder without the penalties.

Becker had stalled big time in his development as a player, disposal was nice but unless I'm mistaken there was a question mark over him being unaccountable and not responding to requests to change that? Something along those lines anyway. If he was that good someone would have scooped him up laughing anyway.

I think retaining players for another year and spending big in supposedly the best draft ever is one hell of a strategy... are you being sarcastic after bashing the club's moves the rest of the time??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:50 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 615
Blue Vain wrote:
What are your expectations for a coach?

IMHO The ideal coach should identify and implement a philosophy which suits the circumstances of the club and be consistent with it.
There are varying interested parties with varying agendas but a strong coach will stick to his guns.

In my opinion, a development coach is our perfect fit.
Wins are nice and consistent form from senior players is great but development and education of our kids is crucial.

I fear our kids have been severely compromised in their development.
The right to make decisions, be creative and exposed to a multi facetted game style walked out the door the day Pagan walked in.

In his first pre season, Pagan totally reprogrammed the players to play a "direct, efficient, collision brand of football"
If a player changed direction in the backline, he stopped them, if a player handballed outside the corridor to a running player, he stopped them. If a player kicked short to a leading forward, he stopped them.
He removed any decision making from the players.

For the first 2 years we played a regimented, low possession game of football that intentionally stifled creativity.

We are now suffering the consequences.
Pagan has finally realised that a significant change of gamestyle is required but the players are not conditioned to adapt.
They struggle with decision making. They lack creative impulses.
You cant stifle a players offensive development and then flick it on a like a light switch.

We bemoan our kick out strategies. We get frustrated when players make foolish decisions.
Where is the development?

Go watch our players train. They are totally restructuring a game style which they had drummed in to them for 2 years.
Whilst we are totally restructuring, other teams are fine tuning.
We spend little time on kick outs and set plays.
We're too busy trying to catch up with the basics.

When we do work on set plays, we are trying to devise our own kickouts. We dont have time to structure up for our opponents kickouts.
There isnt enough time.

This stuff should have been part of their development since 2003.
Instead we have totally reprogrammed the way our players think and play football and then tried to change them back.
There"s been no opportunity to work on any intricacies.

I know we have parents of players who read this site and I dont mean to offend but if my son played for Carlton, I'd be filthy.
As far as I'm concerned, his development has been compromised and stunted.
Whilst Adam Cooney is immersing himself in the encyclopedia of football, our youngsters are being offered the cat in the hat.

Our training is second rate. It has nothing to do with facilities. It's about intellectual stimulation.
Denis Pagan does drills with 6 backs playing on 6 forwards.
How often does that happen in a game?
Watch Barry Mitchell train the Bullants and 4 backs play on 2 forwards. The midfielders are required to improvise, think their way through an adverse situation and make decisions.
Can they spot a forward who is outnumbered? Can those forwards make space for each other?
That is indicative of true match conditions.
That is development.

Development is about making the most of the time available. Offering as much relevant information to players to accelerate their development.
The damage to our players isnt just about today. It's not about yesterday.
It's about realising how much development our players are missing and preventing it happening tomorrow.




BV - always interested to read your posts, enjoy your observations and opinions. In light of what you have said above, I would be really interested to know how much if any training you see of other clubs, and how you rate / compare their drills versus ours.

_________________
Get comfortable being uncomfortable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
thank you for getting it Jar - seems an argument can be used one way and not the other.

everything being said here seems to be based on the fact that Livo/Wiggins/ Sporn (to use your examples) may have been better had there been a better development plan in place - and you use this as proof that our development is, therefore, lacking.

flaws in the argument in my opinion.

a) we'll never know if this statement is true, as you admit, so how can it be proof of anything?

b) your statement that the development is poor does not mean it is, only that you think it is yet you use it as proof to back up your arguments.

c)another example you give is Cooney v Walker -implying that Cooney had been developed 'better' than Walker. But you cannot compare them, just (as you rightly point out) you cannot compare Tambling v Delidio (which is why I compared them in the first place).

Seems to me when I take one of your suppositions and apply the same logic elswhere you see the faults in the logic - apply the same tests to your own.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:13 pm
Posts: 1830
Location: Fitzroy
jimmae wrote:
Davies was contracted for two years, and we'd have to pay him out AND it goes under the cap for the years he was meant to receive the money. That's why we kept him.

They figure, take the hit, or see if we still might get something out of a young kid. They kept him, because they can't pay him out. :|

Dynamite players on the list? You're undervaluing Pagan and overvaluing our stocks. The ones coming in are part of our future for sure but you make it sound Pagan has a premiership 22 and he's pissing it against a wall. Don't be daft.


jimmae, I think you've kind missed Tyrant's point. He never said we have a premiership 22. Players in the Davies/Sporn/Wiggo class have never quite kicked on and you should at least ask the question, have they been given every opportunity in terms of coaching and development?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: murraycray and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group