Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:35 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4748 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147 ... 238  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
trublu wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Yazzamatazz wrote:
Apparently Kruezer failed a medical at pies..


According to David Schwarz? The man is a @#$%&! flog.
Forget listening to his bullshit and you''ll be a lot better off. First he said Kruezer failed a test at the Pies and the next minute he said Kruezer failed a test at "a club".
Backpedalling expertise. I'd suggest he received information that his Collingwood claim was bullshit and tried to back out of it.

The club should approach the AFL and get the facts on Kruezer compensation. If its not band 1, take the flowers to court.
They've created their own mess by allowing teams to go in half rat power in Round 23. If the Bulldogs didn't rest Murphy, Boyd and Morris against the Lions, they wouldn't have lost and this self inflicted conundrum wouldn't have occurred.
@#$%&! em' I say. We're not here to be disadvantaged by their @#$%&! ups.

Based on precedence, Kruezer is band 1 compensation. Thats it.
We should get verification asap and take the flowers down if they want to play games. I'll gladly put my hand in my pocket to assist with legal fees.
Its time these clowns were actually made accountable.


The Ox is pretty spot on with his info



trublu wrote:
Scoop Maclure has just said on 3AW that Kruezer has 'not' failed a medical at any club. He has not had any Medicaid at any club.



Which one is it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
emtwenty wrote:
Effes wrote:
The Brisbane Lions insist they should keep pick two in the national draft regardless of any potential free agency compensation pick Carlton may get for Matthew Kreuzer.

The Lions also argue that if their out-of-contract ruckman Matthew Leuenberger were, like Kreuzer, to leave as a free agent, then the Blues should get picks 1 and 3 in the draft and the Lions picks 2 and 4.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/l ... z3lEgF4bbd


Can handle that. Weitering + Parish or Francis. Or even Curnow.

I reckon the only reason Brisbane want pick 2 so badly is they know if they miss Schache whoever they draft will be back home in Vic or Sa or Wa in two years. Schache is at least a chance to stick around.


Seriously, if this is what they think they should wind the club up NOW.

Fix up the @#$%&! reasons people want to leave. From the outside it looks like they've had consecutive coaches and leadership groups who are @#$%&! idiots or straight out cauliflower.

A bit like us!

The Eagles got all nervous about this shit after Judd left (and Freo use to as well) but now it's @#$%&! hard to get any cauliflower out of there.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Last edited by cimm1979 on Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
Effes wrote:
The Brisbane Lions insist they should keep pick two in the national draft regardless of any potential free agency compensation pick Carlton may get for Matthew Kreuzer.

The Lions also argue that if their out-of-contract ruckman Matthew Leuenberger were, like Kreuzer, to leave as a free agent, then the Blues should get picks 1 and 3 in the draft and the Lions picks 2 and 4.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/l ... z3lEgF4bbd


:roll: amazing :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:47 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
SurreyBlue wrote:
Effes wrote:
The Brisbane Lions insist they should keep pick two in the national draft regardless of any potential free agency compensation pick Carlton may get for Matthew Kreuzer.

The Lions also argue that if their out-of-contract ruckman Matthew Leuenberger were, like Kreuzer, to leave as a free agent, then the Blues should get picks 1 and 3 in the draft and the Lions picks 2 and 4.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/l ... z3lEgF4bbd


:roll: amazing :banghead:

Wouldn't be the end of the world, losing pick one might be, though. :wink:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:54 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Pick 1 & 3 vs Pick 1 & 19.

If this is what it comes to I think we'll survive. Francis could well be the best player from the draft @ 3 if developed properly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
No. We should get what we'd be entitled to. Picks 1 & 2.

They can stick pick 3 !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15064
SurreyBlue wrote:
Effes wrote:
The Brisbane Lions insist they should keep pick two in the national draft regardless of any potential free agency compensation pick Carlton may get for Matthew Kreuzer.

The Lions also argue that if their out-of-contract ruckman Matthew Leuenberger were, like Kreuzer, to leave as a free agent, then the Blues should get picks 1 and 3 in the draft and the Lions picks 2 and 4.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/l ... z3lEgF4bbd


:roll: amazing :banghead:

They insist that there is little difference between Brisbane and Carlton (at least they acknowledge it). Yet if they had finished on the bottom and got a band 1 compo pick for Leuey they would have happily accepted picks 1 and 2.


Last edited by kezza on Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Rexy wrote:
No. We should get what we'd be entitled to. Picks 1 & 2.

They can stick pick 3 !


I'm not disagreeing in a technical sense. They should follow the rules set down each year and shouldn't just change things to suit one club, however, in a practical sense it still might work out all right for us.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4589
Location: Blisstonia.
Whilst in theory #1 and #3 is more than OK, what if Kreuzer attracts an offer of 4 years @600k, and the year older (an actual part of the criteria) can only muster 3 years @400k or anything that is clearly under Band 1.

Then what?

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:05 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
kezza wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Effes wrote:
The Brisbane Lions insist they should keep pick two in the national draft regardless of any potential free agency compensation pick Carlton may get for Matthew Kreuzer.

The Lions also argue that if their out-of-contract ruckman Matthew Leuenberger were, like Kreuzer, to leave as a free agent, then the Blues should get picks 1 and 3 in the draft and the Lions picks 2 and 4.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/l ... z3lEgF4bbd


:roll: amazing :banghead:

They insist that there is little difference between Brisbane and Carlton (at least they acknowledge it). Yet if they had finished on the bottom and got a band 1 compo pick for Leuey they would have happily accepted picks 1 and 2.


This debate (for a better word) would not be occurring if Brisbane had finishes last. There was talk they where going to get pick 2 for Luey before last weeks game even and everyone was ecstatic!
Flower them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10640
Blueboy74 wrote:
Whilst in theory #1 and #3 is more than OK, what if Kreuzer attracts an offer of 4 years @600k, and the year older (an actual part of the criteria) can only muster 3 years @400k or anything that is clearly under Band 1.

Then what?


Restricted free agent for starters so we can match but I believe we have offered more than that. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Blueboy74 wrote:
Whilst in theory #1 and #3 is more than OK, what if Kreuzer attracts an offer of 4 years @600k, and the year older (an actual part of the criteria) can only muster 3 years @400k or anything that is clearly under Band 1.

Then what?


Give us both PPs and judge Kreuzer and Leu on their own merits.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
Rexy wrote:
No. We should get what we'd be entitled to. Picks 1 & 2.

They can stick pick 3 !


With you x10000
It's not our problem
Huge ramifications for the integrity of the AFL if the draft is manipulated by head office

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4589
Location: Blisstonia.
Pafloyul wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Whilst in theory #1 and #3 is more than OK, what if Kreuzer attracts an offer of 4 years @600k, and the year older (an actual part of the criteria) can only muster 3 years @400k or anything that is clearly under Band 1.

Then what?


Give us both PPs and judge Kreuzer and Leu on their own merits.


Absolutely. Was referring more to the comments from the Lions Chairman who seems to want to disregard anything in the actual rules and criteria of free agency and just value Leunberger on equal terms with Kreuzer....

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19598
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
http://www.news.com.au/national/carlton ... 7520026495

CARLTON faces weeks of list limbo after the AFL declared itself unable to offer a free agency compensation value for ruckman Matthew Kreuzer until an offer is formally put to him next month.

AFL football operations manager Mark Evans this week warned Carlton is not assured a first-round selection as compensation should Kreuzer elect to leave under free agency.

Even if the “complex” secret formula used by the league to work out the level of compensation demands a first-round draft selection, the league can veto if its expert committee rules the outcome “materially anomalous”.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
What a crock of shit

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23931
unbelievable. :roll:

really.
unbelievable rubbish.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:40 pm
Posts: 826
Okay, we will take picks 1 & 3 if that helps out our brothers up north.

We will take Aish or Mayes as a reciprocal gesture from them.

All sorted. What's next?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
I think the AFL should grant both clubs priority picks.

The Lions' should be pre-1st round in recognition of the fact that they have been ordinary for longer than us, and it was within their power to tank against WB and they didn't. Not tanking when it is grossly beneficial to do so should be incentivised.

To compensate us for the loss of the first effective pick when this debacle is not of our making, and to discourage us from getting all litigious about it, we should then be granted a pick before the beginning of the 2nd round. We retain the first pick in the PDS because we finished 18th.

Free agency compensation picks for Kreuzer and Leuenberger should then be assessed entirely on their own merits based on the previous precedents and the commonly accepted formula and granted in whichever round is appropriate based on the facts of the cases. This avoids creating more bizarre free agency precedents that just cause headaches down the road to solve an unrelated problem.

It solves the AFL and Lions' problem by ensuring they get one of the best two players.

Carlton will love it because we'll get probably the same players we expected to get prior to the Lions/WB game, and an extra top 20 pick to boot, fast tracking the rebuild.

The media will love it because it's an elegant solution and they're easily impressed and because only Emma Quayle rates picks outside the 1st round anyway.

The other 16 clubs will tolerate it because their own 1st round pick is no worse off than expected and because they don't really want any rival to get the two best players in any draft if it can be avoided (neither would we). It may even improve their first round pick by a spot if the AFL ultimately only deems Leuenberger is worth band 2 compo when the temptation would otherwise be to 'tinker' with his value to compensate Brisbane.

So the only people who will hate it is fans of other clubs who are ultimately unimportant, and Carlton fans who don't trust Brisbane to take the local kid with pick 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:41 pm 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4779
Lion more ordinary than us and get a pre 1st round. Are you serious? They then get the academy players too.

Last time I checked they have a number of nice key position players developing in this side. Where are ours?

No don't buy this.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4748 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147 ... 238  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group