Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 4:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:44 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Blue Vain wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
IIRC, Harry Madden was brushed off pretty quick in favour of Matty Allan. Harry retired, IIRC, when he saw the writing on the wall in terms of the Club's preference for Allan over him. Mid-season retirement.....pretty ordinary way to go, don't you think? No end of year celebration?


Poor recollection KK.
Justin Madden should have retired the year before.
John Elliott admitted that Madden was retained on the list to reward his "service to the club" :roll:

Madden did Jack Shit the year he retired and was only talked into retiring so Mark Porter could be added to the senior list.
Matt Allan was struggling with injuries and Madden was well past senior football, leaving the club without a ruckman.

I only recall this because Madden then had the hide to threaten the club with a long service claim after they'd looked after the parasite so well.

Mind you, I'm not saying this to defend any coaches, only to set the record straight.
No doubt Parkin axed as many players as Pagan has.


I reckon Porters 1st game was just about his best. Remember his tap down to Bradley who went for a run and goaled from outside 50? :)

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:46 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
JuzzCarlton wrote:
TheGame wrote:
JuzzCarlton wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Most contract negotiations start when the existing contract is nearly up. :wink:

So you don't have a name that is more qualified? :wink:
Quote:
Carlton offered more money for less work and he jumped ship.

Less work?

He'd be doing more work than most AFL coaches given our circumstances and is earning every cent.
Quote:
Parkin never disrespected Carlton legends.

What exactly did he do to Ratten that was so bad? Camporeale isn't a legend.


You tell me. You apparently know it all.

A weak effort to take a shot at Denis via Ratten and not back it up.


No you keep telling me I'm wrong so find out for yourself from someone else.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3265
Game

Looking after club champions is not the solution to taking us forward. Surely you accept that part of our problem is that for too long we have looked after (with kid gloves) our so called champions.

Whether it was Pagan, Lyon, Harvey or Britts, soemone was going to have make some bloody tough and ruthless calls. Everyone of the so called Carlton champions that has left since Pagan's arrival was past their best and it was way past time that we started to re-build. The fact that Pagan was a shinboner rather than a Carlton champion reeks of all the inherent problems of self absorbtion that Collingwood are only getting over (40 years on).

I would also challenge your statement that Parkin respected Carlton champions - you only have to have been around when he was very challenged with getting rid of Wayne Johnston, Jimmy Buckley and Harmsey who were all past being ready to go - it just took someone brave enough to finally make the decision. I would also argue that our inability to make tougher calls then (in the late 80's) is a consistent thread with the virus that still shares its effects today.

To blame Carltons plight on Denis Pagan and last three years is not only myopic but dangerous. Our issues extend way back to the amazing successes that started in the 60's - and the self absorbtion that has come with it. A great thing and who would change it for anything.

However, like back in the 50's and 60's we have pain to go through and tough calls to be made. Just as the culture and successes of the 70's/80's was different to what went before it, the culture and successes of the the next 20 years will be different. We have to evolve.

My recommendation to you and others would to be to get on board, change is happening - it is real, it is needed, it is not always savoury - whether you like it or not.

One thing is for certain, the journey will be worth every minute of it. Cause i for one believe that we will be back bigger and better.

When? who knows, but the blocks are being put in place. Come on get on board!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
london blue....thanks for stemming the "It's all their fault" sentiments.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:05 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
No, because their logic is flawed, and their arguments have no merit at this stage.


Isn't our logic flawed too? I mean this is fans discussing football, not physics. :?

We have a bloke at the top which has in my mind, wasted at least 2 yrs of our club on recycled no hopers and trying to force an outdated gameplan upon us. We know now that he is striving for input from the new assistants and incorporating an interily different idea and he has finally put an end to recycling...A bit late for a proven coach? Some might say.

Ok, In my mind this was almost necessary to employ a proven coach. 1. To get the memberships up 2. To get sponsorship deals. 3. So us fans wouldn't start a revolt of somesort and stop supporting.

But who's to say that employing a Mark Harvey, Ross Lyon or Barry Mitchell that we just may (after some heartache) be in a better position right now.? We are going on what ifs...The bashers are like "what if some young coach would have us in a better position right now" and we are like "But what if Pagan can build a solid unit and get us to the finals"

At the moment we are shit. Blame it on the entire situation or you can blame the Coach if you want. So be it..................

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
TheGame wrote:
No you keep telling me I'm wrong so find out for yourself from someone else.

You were wrong to bag Pagan as a money grubbing Shinboner.

If you make a statement you should at least have the balls to back it up and not skate around the issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:08 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
What london said!.

GET ON BOARD!!!

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:10 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
JuzzCarlton wrote:
TheGame wrote:
No you keep telling me I'm wrong so find out for yourself from someone else.

You were wrong to bag Pagan as a money grubbing Shinboner.

If you make a statement you should at least have the balls to back it up and not skirt around the issue.


Why he left North to come here for more money. That is fact. North couldn't afford him hence the extra activities that would see others pay his wage that he was NEVER going to do thus Carlton's offer was 200k more than Norths.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
BigBlind wrote:
We have a bloke at the top which has in my mind, wasted at least 2 yrs of our club on recycled no hopers and trying to force an outdated gameplan upon us. We know now that he is striving for input from the new assistants and incorporating an interily different idea and he has finally put an end to recycling...A bit late for a proven coach? Some might say.


But recycling discards was the only way the club could get mature bodied players to the club. No draft picks to trade, and no players that any other club was willing to trade for.
It's not surprising that the club has stopped grabbing recycled players now that it is able to fully participate in the draft and trade period.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
BigBlind wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
No, because their logic is flawed, and their arguments have no merit at this stage.


Isn't our logic flawed too? I mean this is fans discussing football, not physics. :?

We have a bloke at the top which has in my mind, wasted at least 2 yrs of our club on recycled no hopers and trying to force an outdated gameplan upon us. We know now that he is striving for input from the new assistants and incorporating an interily different idea and he has finally put an end to recycling...A bit late for a proven coach? Some might say.

Ok, In my mind this was almost necessary to employ a proven coach. 1. To get the memberships up 2. To get sponsorship deals. 3. So us fans wouldn't start a revolt of somesort and stop supporting.

But who's to say that employing a Mark Harvey, Ross Lyon or Barry Mitchell that we just may (after some heartache) be in a better position right now.? We are going on what ifs...The bashers are like "what if some young coach would have us in a better position right now" and we are like "But what if Pagan can build a solid unit and get us to the finals"

At the moment we are shit. Blame it on the entire situation or you can blame the Coach if you want. So be it..................


First point - my logic is always impeccable. So there :wink:

Your point about "wasting 2 years on recycled no-hopers" isn't entirely relevant. What else could he have done? Stuck with players who would rather not play than play under Pagan? Just let us have a list of 22 players? We simply didn't have access to decent players those years. Full stop. If he had have gone for youngsters in the high draft numbers you might be moaning about how he picked nothing but dud young'uns. He had no access to the first 2 years of the draft effectively, and I ask again What else could he have done? And add to that, what else could anyone have done?

And how dare you call Nick Stevens a recycled no-hoper :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:19 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
First point - my logic is always impeccable. So there :wink:

Your point about "wasting 2 years on recycled no-hopers" isn't entirely relevant. What else could he have done


:-D

Yeah I agree with you about that...I found it basically the only path to take, however there are plenty of people who still insist that they would've started the rebuilding back then, with rookies and late picks. (I reckon thats crazy) Also they'd have you trade some players now such as Fev and Lance to get even more picks. Just a 'if you're gonna rebuild then don't do it half cocked' attitude.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
BigBlind wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
First point - my logic is always impeccable. So there :wink:

Your point about "wasting 2 years on recycled no-hopers" isn't entirely relevant. What else could he have done


:-D

Yeah I agree with you about that...I found it basically the only path to take, however there are plenty of people who still insist that they would've started the rebuilding back then, with rookies and late picks. (I reckon thats crazy) Also they'd have you trade some players now such as Fev and Lance to get even more picks. Just a 'if you're gonna rebuild then don't do it half cocked' attitude.


Same shit, different bucket. What's the difference between getting recycled duds comapred to untried duds? At least the retreads have big match experience, which is a thing you can't teach.

Either way, we would still be right here in exactly the same position were are in now.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:34 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Kaptain Kouta wrote:

Same shit, different bucket. What's the difference between getting recycled duds comapred to untried duds?


I think the 'untried' bit is the key there. But yeah...maybe it wouldn't be any different now...but I suppose you never know, and for the life of me I can't imagine it being any worse...

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
What's done is done.....it's history.

It's a new season!....the best time of the year (for us).... :wink:

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:45 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Oh how and why did I get involved in this thread! Maybe I have a fear of happiness? :wink:

GET ON BOARD!!!

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19598
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Andrew McQualter, Sam Fisher, Matt Egan, Shane Tuck

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Effes wrote:
Andrew McQualter, Sam Fisher, Matt Egan, Shane Tuck

Were all overlooked by 15 other clubs unlike stars such as Heath James, Brad Smith, Karl Norman, Paul Thomas and Matthew Lokan.

I think Fisher, Bentick and Betts even the ledger, unless we also want to point the finger at Carlton overlooking Danyle Pearce for Batson?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
20/20 hindsight is a beautiful thing.

It may have been a mistake to follow the strategy that Pagan did, but considering the uncertainty surrounding draft selections, particularly late in the order, it doesn't mean the reasons behind his decisions were wrong.

Look at why he made the decisions, not the end result later. Even then, I'm far from convinced we would be any better off than we are now.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 2712
Synbad wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
He has a lot to pass on.....

How to refuse to train with your team mates until your lucrative contract is signed.

How to announce your retirement through the AFL instead of the club that looked after you for 15 years.


I usually respect you posts, but get over It :roll: .


The problem with this club is we idolise remnants that are at least in part responsible for bending us over.
What BV says is right.
If it were up to Braddles he would still be playing for us.. but signing his contract right about now...(a fat contract)
We got done for salary cap rorts two times involving Braddles.

Good player... but was part of why were where were at today.



For the record we have Platten a car to come to us... he never gave it back!!! :twisted:


Some more words of wisdom :roll:

Once again, comments like that show you have your head stuck up your arse and your anything to do with the elliott days, you will continue to blame as our current demise.

I don't @#$%&! get you at all! I shouldn't even bother with inane, pathetic comments like that. Why am i wasting my breath debating with some clown who berates anyone who disagrees, and never for one minute takes on board the opinions of others, often spitting abuse when he realises others are disagreeing with him.

Hey, sos was part of that era. I suppose he is a disgrace as well, and his service wasn't worth it all because of where we are at now.

Synbad, What more could these players have done?!

Well done Braddles. Good luck with your coaching apprenticship at the dons (Who gives a f..k, he is a 370+ game player). He has done enough good at Carlton.

Synbad, one thing you can't deny is bradley's work ethic and lifestyle. I know your not that stupid to think that because you can be quite intelligent sometimes.

His fitness and durability led him to go on way past Sticks, Diesel and these types. That's incredible.

Hopefully Braddles you'll be back at Carlton someday, but best of luck to you mate.

_________________
Corinthians 9:6- 8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18078
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Effes wrote:
Andrew McQualter, Sam Fisher, Matt Egan, Shane Tuck

Were all overlooked by 15 other clubs unlike stars such as Heath James, Brad Smith, Karl Norman, Paul Thomas and Matthew Lokan.

I think Fisher, Bentick and Betts even the ledger, unless we also want to point the finger at Carlton overlooking Danyle Pearce for Batson?



Someone asked what options there were other than drafting discards.

Effes gave a perfectly legitimate answer.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group