Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Drewgirl wrote:
What I have seen so far is a lack of intensity, and they are slow in moving the ball.
There should not be much difference due to Fev not being there. Our midfield has gone backwards so far for some reason. This was our strength last year. I think our backs are better, our rucks are better and technically our forward line should keep the ball in better this year.
Problem for mine. Midfield seems slow.
Agree to some extent and that is why the solution lies in the coaches box...we are in need of some ingenuity this year from the box....would love to see some pace played through the middle...ie. Betts and Walks for example. We need line breakers running through the guts much more than chuggers...
You are a dynamic duo Drewgirl/ J & K's.
I reckon you're right. Slow in the midfield.
So what's happened? Nothing much until you look at FF, but we are slower in the midfield.
Betts and Walker in the guts. That's a brave move, but it has merit.
Perhaps McLean should focus on sprint work over the next fortnight because he's a starter with Judd out. The spotlight is on him.
He's the only difference to our midfield in our 2010 campaign...and he hasn't excelled as expected.
IMO, with or without Fev we are still a very young team full of class and are expected to play like seasoned campaigners because yes, we are bereft of senior players, but we expect high draft picks to be ready within their first 3 years (1st preferably).
Our list is sensational on every line. I'm excited by that.
I reckon there's only so much a coach can do to make kids men over night.
We're young, but we made the finals and nearly a top 4 finish, after half our list were decimated by injury in the 2nd half.
I like the idea of adding speed instead of pure grunt (Hadley McLean types).
Have to think about that.
Have to wait to see it next Thursday. I can't wait for that.