Traveller86 wrote:
Go and get [REDACTED] you conditional campaigning cauliflower!
Hewett, Haynes and Jagga excused.
The rest can GAGF.
And Fraser is very smart not to commit to this rabble.
If you are celebrating that performance then you are part of the problem.
If anything, I reckon it’s almost the opposite.
There are many great players at other teams who would never have had the opportunity to become the players they did if they’d been at Carlton due to the incessant, overblown criticism they get from the supporters who spend way too much time and energy bagging them rather than actually supporting them.
This goes back to the later days at Princess Park where I was horrified to see Carlton members who were much more critical of, and frankly rude to, our own players and coaches than they were of our opponents.
Sure, we’ve got lots to work on but the world is not collapsing. Were one of three teams to have won 7 in a row this season. The other 2 are the top two teams. After we had lost 8 of our first 9 games. With a list that nobody thought was top 10 even before the season exposed our poor form.
We got uncharacteristically smashed in the midfield and still found a way to win. Personally, I think that was a 5-6 goal win without some of those ridiculous umpiring decisions which not only gave them unwarranted goals but also stopped our momentum.
A few players went missing but others played well. Kemp was a classic example of the team - he dropped some marks he would normally take but also kicked a couple of goals he would normally miss.
We have much to improve but the club is on it and, in the meantime, we have been winning.
And I’m not sure of the value in unequivocally stating as fact that anybody celebrating that victory is part of the problem. I don’t think it is such a binary thing. And if you disagree, that doesn’t make you ‘part of the problem’. It just means you have a different opinion.