Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 2:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
It also sends a message to the incumbents that the members aren't happy, and then hopefully the board will react to that and become more open.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Election
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7491
Still undecided about who gets my vote at this stage.Gonna think long and hard before i decide.For a start,i feel very gratefull to Sticks,Valmorbida and Pavlou for putting there hands up when we were in more trouble than the earl settlers and they had more than there share of troubles.But times change and things move on so i am open to other candidates.
But i have got a problem with Lee.And some hard questions...........
Like....now that Sticks,Valmoebia and P{avlou have done the dirty work and put in the hard yards you all of a sudden want to get on board.You were around 3 years ago but didnt have a go...Why now have you become interested.Is it because the other 3 dummies have done the dirty work for you.
This is not a smartarse question,but i would really like to know why the suden interest ?
I listened to him on the radio and have read his mail out.Gotta be honest and say he just sounds like every other namby pamby feelgood spindoctor.Not overly impressed.Gotta get a bit more oooomph before he wins me.
Havent heard from the other 2 so no comment.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Election
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7491
Still undecided about who gets my vote at this stage.Gonna think long and hard before i decide.For a start,i feel very gratefull to Sticks,Valmorbida and Pavlou for putting there hands up when we were in more trouble than the earl settlers and they had more than there share of troubles.But times change and things move on so i am open to other candidates.
But i have got a problem with Lee.And some hard questions...........
Like....now that Sticks,Valmoebia and P{avlou have done the dirty work and put in the hard yards you all of a sudden want to get on board.You were around 3 years ago but didnt have a go...Why now have you become interested.Is it because the other 3 dummies have done the dirty work for you.
This is not a smartarse question,but i would really like to know why the suden interest ?
I listened to him on the radio and have read his mail out.Gotta be honest and say he just sounds like every other namby pamby feelgood spindoctor.Not overly impressed.Gotta get a bit more oooomph before he wins me.
Havent heard from the other 2 so no comment.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
cue cue synbad synbad 8) 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
Classic Mickstar, all relevant questions; a reasonable approach.

All offers are welcome, come join our club, you're input is invaluable, we'll adopt your 'good ideas', as you help us on our quest to the 17th Premiership.

THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:37 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:38 am
Posts: 163
Location: MELBOURNE
I'd vote for him purely on his comments re Saddington.

I don't care what Pagan or Hughes say after the event it was a dumb pick. Last year they picked up Raso at 70 something. There had to be something better that Sadington.

That said we would have been better off not picking anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Election
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Mickstar wrote:
Still undecided about who gets my vote at this stage.Gonna think long and hard before i decide.For a start,i feel very gratefull to Sticks,Valmorbida and Pavlou for putting there hands up when we were in more trouble than the earl settlers and they had more than there share of troubles.But times change and things move on so i am open to other candidates.
But i have got a problem with Lee.And some hard questions...........
Like....now that Sticks,Valmoebia and P{avlou have done the dirty work and put in the hard yards you all of a sudden want to get on board.You were around 3 years ago but didnt have a go...Why now have you become interested.Is it because the other 3 dummies have done the dirty work for you.
This is not a smartarse question,but i would really like to know why the suden interest ?
I listened to him on the radio and have read his mail out.Gotta be honest and say he just sounds like every other namby pamby feelgood spindoctor.Not overly impressed.Gotta get a bit more oooomph before he wins me.
Havent heard from the other 2 so no comment.


Mick what hard hard did sticks put in?
He was on Elliots side...

And thats ok if you want to vote for more of the same...
Pavlou Valmorbida have been terrific around the club.. jack in the boxes when it comes to ideas.

PS .. love to know what those two have done around the club apart from shake hands and kiss babies.

But thats ok..Lets keep them.



Dannyboy.. amazing how you can prophesize... :P

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
I'm amazing in many wonderous ways 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 436
Blue Vain wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
"My area of specialty is A,B and C and I believe I can improve the Carlton Football Club greatly in these areas. I'll leave the drafting to the football department and judge them on their actions"

Would you have thought any less of him?


No but I wouldn't have thought anything of him.


:lol:

I give up.
I can only hit my head against the wall so many times. :)

Yes, I agree Mikkey.
He sounds like he brings something we have been lacking for a long time.



Don't give up Blue Vain. You make perfect sense in your balanced comments. Some posters here lack basic comprehension skills. Lee should stick to his strengths and commenting on the Saddington trade is asking for trouble. He may already have a coach and recruiter offside before the ballot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
I think it is prudent to have someone from the match committe on the board.

This would enable a more intimate and accurate source of information for the board's consideration when referring to personnel on the field, call it "from the inner sanctum", and for the side of caution, would be independent of the coach's version of the playing team.

It's healthy.

If that make sense to pursue, and assuming we can fit the position on the board, is Stcks the best candidate? If not, who?.

...I don't think Wes Lofts is a contender.

THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK!! with or without Sticks on the Board.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Election
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:38 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:26 pm
Posts: 332
Mickstar wrote:
Still undecided about who gets my vote at this stage.Gonna think long and hard before i decide.For a start,i feel very gratefull to Sticks,Valmorbida and Pavlou for putting there hands up when we were in more trouble than the earl settlers and they had more than there share of troubles.But times change and things move on so i am open to other candidates.
But i have got a problem with Lee.And some hard questions...........
Like....now that Sticks,Valmoebia and P{avlou have done the dirty work and put in the hard yards you all of a sudden want to get on board.You were around 3 years ago but didnt have a go...Why now have you become interested.Is it because the other 3 dummies have done the dirty work for you.
This is not a smartarse question,but i would really like to know why the suden interest ?
I listened to him on the radio and have read his mail out.Gotta be honest and say he just sounds like every other namby pamby feelgood spindoctor.Not overly impressed.Gotta get a bit more oooomph before he wins me.
Havent heard from the other 2 so no comment.


I think you will find that Lee's interest is not sudden. I think if you actually did your homework you would find that Lee has put in more for this club in the past 3 years, with zero aknowldegment, than a number of the current board. Created and ran the Hero's campaign for one - raising $800,000. How many other board members have come up with ideas like that for the club? He created the Carlton Foundation and resurrented the Hall of Fame. Remember he is just a member like you and I - and he has done this. I think he has paid his dues well and truely and deserves the opportunity to put his creative thinking across all areas of the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
That's the sort of information we need Speedy.

We need to know of their contributions to the Carlton FC to date, and

Their vision towards the future!

KPI SCORE: LEE

1. Hero's campaign initiator / raised $800,000
2. Carlton Foundation / (I need more info on this)
3. Resurrected Hall of Fame / Renovation & Respect

Progressive score:

Lee 3 KPI's and $800,000




THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK!! with or without Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Election
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Speedy wrote:


I think you will find that Lee's interest is not sudden. I think if you actually did your homework you would find that Lee has put in more for this club in the past 3 years, with zero aknowldegment, than a number of the current board. Created and ran the Hero's campaign for one - raising $800,000. How many other board members have come up with ideas like that for the club? He created the Carlton Foundation and resurrented the Hall of Fame. Remember he is just a member like you and I - and he has done this. I think he has paid his dues well and truely and deserves the opportunity to put his creative thinking across all areas of the club.


He's got my vote over the tuna man


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25685
Location: Bondi Beach
Hold your horses Rhys....you must know something I don't.

The score sheet is:

Lee 3 KPI's / $800,000 to LEE
Val (no info submitted to TC)
Pavlou (no info submitted to TC )
Sticks (no info subitted to TC)

You should give the other candidates a chance to submit their contributions before you decide...unless you don't want to, and are fixed on the preference of change to the current board; regardless of score, because....you know something I don't! Don't you? Giddeeup..

THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:18 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
For 20 years we let a drunk tell the members who he wanted on the board and it became a cabal of toadies and yes-men that were the audience watching Nero while Rome burned.

As members we were also culpable for the make-up of the board over that time and we should never allow this to happen again.

In my mind refreshing the board with nominees not necessarily aligned with the President or the rest of the board is the way to go. We need fresh eyes and ears in that room to prevent any further disasters.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:29 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7460
Jarusa wrote:
In my mind refreshing the board with nominees not necessarily aligned with the President or the rest of the board is the way to go. We need fresh eyes and ears in that room to prevent any further disasters.

That's the way I see it as well...

Three years is enough time for a board member to prove their worth so unless a paricular member is doing an extraordinary job, then I'm all for electing a new face(s) with fresh ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1354
I found it interesting that no one has posted any comments in relation to what Lee said about pagans re-signing:

Quote:
In retrospect it wasn't the right decision to re-sign Pagan, he wasn't in danger of being poached. Seemed ok at the time but in hindsight...


I havent heard the interview, so am unsure about what contect he said this. However from just reading this quote, is it fair to say that Greg Lee didn't want Pagan re-signed and as such is not a supporter of Pagan?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1624
Just jostling for position, the louder the bang the bigger the impact.
Lee's giving what some need and want to hear, quite savvy.
From a member voting point view, one must be very careful and not make hasty decisions.
Let's hear Marcus and the others and weight it all up. We have already had a board revolution.
This is now the important process of the evolution of the CFC.
Ciao
:-D

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:29 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
KERMIT wrote:
I'd vote for him purely on his comments re Saddington.

I don't care what Pagan or Hughes say after the event it was a dumb pick. Last year they picked up Raso at 70 something. There had to be something better that Sadington.

That said we would have been better off not picking anyone.


Tall defenders are hard to pick up and we needed the extra size and experience down back..he isnt that old and it really is only the injury woes that seem to be the negative. His skill level is good and he is a good athlete when fit....for a late pick it was worth the risk....you have to have some balance of age on your list and while I am a great of supporter of recruiting and playing youth you need to have some mid age players with experience to supplement the young blokes....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:51 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:26 pm
Posts: 332
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
I found it interesting that no one has posted any comments in relation to what Lee said about pagans re-signing:

Quote:
In retrospect it wasn't the right decision to re-sign Pagan, he wasn't in danger of being poached. Seemed ok at the time but in hindsight...


I havent heard the interview, so am unsure about what contect he said this. However from just reading this quote, is it fair to say that Greg Lee didn't want Pagan re-signed and as such is not a supporter of Pagan?


I think you might be reading a little too much into this. I believe he was speaking more of the process and the strategy rather than the decision itself. I do not think he has declared himself on Pagan, and probably would not do so given that Pagan has 2 years to run on his contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group