Rexy wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Forget about Malthouse for the moment...
Do we need an independent review of all things Carlton or not???
This is a thread about turning the club around...
Im not interested in whether people think any review is humanly possible to make independent or not.Thats ust theorizing.
Im asking if its possible... does the club need to partake in one.. open itself up and have itself fully examined from top to bottom???
you're just theorizing and ignoring practicalities
what we all KNOW is that we need is new leadership
we need to crack the stranglehold of power
we need Fahour to challenge Kernahan to a loser leaves town match
Wait.....
im theorizing and youre not!???
Do you know Fahour???
Why would Fahour go up against Kernahan and Mathieson???
Why do you think he will win??
Why do you think he is what we need???
We need first to ESTABLISH what people have been up to around the club... have they been satisfactory... how they have reached their position.. and where its all fallen down ...if in fact it has...
Maybe your suggestion is inferior to mine.. because the route we take is not the right one.
Dont learn from the past youre doomed to fail in the future.
Lets see how we have been doing things first and foremost..
Maybe the people conducting the review can come in from overseas.
Maybe people like Mathieson would bank roll it... because he does want one believe it or not.
Do we need a review on the club or do we blindly follow Fahour???
See an indie review will collect data from all over the