WARNING: long rant
I rarely post but this issue has got me really annoyed.
The club has lost me. Why would the club reward Lance with a two year contract @ $350K+ per year after just one good season from his past four playing as loose man in defence? For the first time in many years (and after years of frustration for most supporters), Lance is worth a first round draft pick yet now the club is too gutless to get rid of him. During the last part of the season I was hoping some club might be lured into thinking he could play CHF/CHB for them but have the board been misled into thinking this as well. Could anyone realistically see Lance playing on Tredrea, Riewoldt, Brown, Hall or Pavlich? That sort of match-up would give me nightmares. I repeat, he is a third defender/forward not a KPP. Third defender/forward’s are NOT worth over $300K+ even if they do have a good footy brain.
I can understand why the club is considering trading Fevola as it would net some better draft picks. However, it seems incredibly stupid to sign Lance up and trade away Fev when Fev plays a much more vital role in the team. Lance’s role could be played by almost anyone whereas we don’t have an adequate replacement for Brendan. I would be extremely disappointed if we kept Lance and got rid of Fevola.
Lappin can look elsewhere if he really wants 3 years, but I can’t imagine many other clubs would be willing to give a guy who turns 30 next year a 3 year contract, especially after such a poor season.
I’m sick of Campo. Other clubs don’t want to trade for him because he’s an unaccountable, poor excuse for a senior player. Why should we keep him when other clubs don’t even think he’s worth anything? I would be interested in knowing what he club thinks he offers the team other than experience, as it would be better for the future to have someone like Russell playing Campo’s BP position.
If we had a poll with the question “Are you disenchanted with the clubs
reversal on it’s hard-line stance?â€