Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:21 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:40 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Due to Jack's legacy Carlton is on the nose in the corporate world. The brand is still soiled by a stench of fraud. Marketing Directors and Brand Managers are very sensitive when it comes to who they tie their own brand to. The Carlton brand is now weak - so that is (IMO) a major reason why we struggle on the sponsorship front. Can you blame the current board? Well, only that they could have done more to have more positive media etc. but difficult when you have no money and your list is the worst in the league with no chance for a quick turn around due to the sanctions imposed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
in my opinion youre either a can do or cant do....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Elliott bags Blues.

Bring back Jack because he is really concerned with how Carlton is perceived in the market place. :roll: :evil:

Great to see the club is on the front foot and promoting the fact Murphy and Blackwell might play this week.

For example, Ryder to debut


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sheedy has brainwashed the footy world into thinking Ryder is the number 1 pick.. just noone picked him number 1.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:57 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
TheGame wrote:
bulls#$%! Essendon* would have taken them to court the same way Jack would of. But you voted Collo in.


Hey Game I think you full of crap!!!
Essendon* were penalised in 1999 for salary cup rorting - I think they were excluded from the 1st and 2nd round of the national draft and the preseason draft in 99.

In 2002 they off loaded carcella, hefferenan and blumfield, three premiership players so they could fit within the salary cup rules. They learnt their lesson we never did - Pigs Arse Elliot thought he was above the salary cup.

We paid the price for his cheating and deserved what we got - Elliot was great in the 80's but like your theories he is an outdated and obsolete now


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:12 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9116
Location: Nth Fitzroy
I was never comfortable with the way everyone carried on with the ousting of Jack. Thought there was a better way where we all could have worked together and got ourselves back on the right track with out all the madness.

People got carried away and led by a few madmen like Gobaggers( we all know he turned out to be a dud ) and those USC kooks and next thing you know kaos unfolded.

Footy has never been the same to me since. Playing under a roof. Being happy to lose so there is a chance we will win in the future, carlton being crap and past players hating the club. Its all changed so much that i reckon i would even suppoort a merge. The Blues arn't what they use to be to me so i dont think a merger would freak me out anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
club29 wrote:
I was never comfortable with the way everyone carried on with the ousting of Jack. Thought there was a better way where we all could have worked together and got ourselves back on the right track with out all the madness.

People got carried away and led by a few madmen like Gobaggers( we all know he turned out to be a dud ) and those USC kooks and next thing you know kaos unfolded.

Footy has never been the same to me since. Playing under a roof. Being happy to lose so there is a chance we will win in the future, carlton being crap and past players hating the club. .


Excellent post right up to there! :wink:


Sums up what many of us are feeling.

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Its very important to put things into their rightful perspective.
The UTC did what they did because of where the club was heading.
There was no nice way to get rid of Elliot. He wasnt going to go because he had nothing else going for himself.. and because he had too many skeletons in the cupboard.

It wasnt like you can reason with Big Jack.. he was an unreasonable man...

And yes footy has changed from what we knew as kids ... but that doesnt mean it cant be good under a roof.. or rebuilding / losing and watching kids grow and them finally delivering to us just like the great generations before them did for us....

Its just abit different and you have to adapt to it.

In the last 40 years we have dominated the comp... dominated because we were the best under the existing rules.. we bought players better than any other club.. we had the best home ground blah blah blah...

But theres alwaways things you can do to be numero uno.. you just have to continue adapting.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:37 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
club29 wrote:
I was never comfortable with the way everyone carried on with the ousting of Jack. Thought there was a better way where we all could have worked together and got ourselves back on the right track with out all the madness.



That is all nice in theory club, except that Jack refused to admit that there was anything wrong except for on-field performance!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:39 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
Synbad wrote:
There was no nice way to get rid of Elliot. He wasnt going to go because he had nothing else going for himself.. and because he had too many skeletons in the cupboard.


Exactly - there was no way he was going to go gracefully and for the greater good of his "beloved" footy club.

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 8:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The USC and coterie groups/ influential members tried talking to Elliot about moving on.. he wouldnt.

Unfortunately when people drink from the cup of power its pretty hard to shake them .
I just hope this group arent the same.

There are too many baby kissers and hand shakers that think theyre doing a strirling job for their country/ club whatever....

Alot of them are posers!!!

One thing about Collo isnt he isnt there to pose...

... but at the moment i cant agree with the direction of the club or its performance

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 1689
Quote:
And no the sponsors didnt jump on board then and jump off now...
Dan Murphys was tossed to us by Mathieson ...


Somewhat surprised that Mathieson was able to simply "toss us" Dan Murphy's given that it is owned 100% by Woolworths.

Whilst Mathieson has significant & close business dealings with Woolworths he has zero ownership/interest/control over Dan's or how it spends its funds.

Dan's sponsorship would have ultimately been a decision for Dan's management team who are answerable to Woolies.

regards

_________________
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:33 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Quote:
And no the sponsors didnt jump on board then and jump off now...
Dan Murphys was tossed to us by Mathieson ...


Somewhat surprised that Mathieson was able to simply "toss us" Dan Murphy's given that it is owned 100% by Woolworths.

Whilst Mathieson has significant & close business dealings with Woolworths he has zero ownership/interest/control over Dan's or how it spends its funds.

Dan's sponsorship would have ultimately been a decision for Dan's management team who are answerable to Woolies.

regards


Don't underestimate the value of an introduction ...

It's the key people who have influence over others, however indirectly, which allow a club and sponsors to get together and forge a relationship.

It's not easy competing for the corporate dollar - ask every sporting club at every level in australia at the moment - having a sh!te team and then not having the means to improve it meaningfully in the short to medium term because of AFL penalties puts us in a dire position. Sponsors want to be associated with success ... we can't offer that at the moment.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:06 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3194
Location: Whistler
John Elliot? That prick who made our Club insolvent, and refused to move on?

Oh yeah, I really need to know what he is saying between drinks and gropes and slagging off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:48 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Well said Headplant! Go get em' fella!

I can't help but think those who seem be taking JE's 'side' in any of these debates are just pining for the past that crumbled before our eyes. Mr.Elliott has been discredited on many levels, as a Director, as a businessman, and to latch on to anything he says in hindsight has to be thrown away like the junk it is. To blame in incoming management group for that is naivity at best, stupidity at worst. The guy isn't even admitting to cap breaches - surely you can all see where that got us?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
molsey wrote:
To blame in incoming management group for that is naivity at best, stupidity at worst. The guy isn't even admitting to cap breaches - surely you can all see where that got us?


Problem is, molsey, that no, they can't see that.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 1689
Quote:
Don't underestimate the value of an introduction ...

It's the key people who have influence over others, however indirectly, which allow a club and sponsors to get together and forge a relationship.


Dukes,

I agree wholeheartedly. However, for some on here to infer that we are shit and that we can only get sponsorships because they are "tossed" to us is absolute falacy.

Whilst Mathieson may well have introduced Dan's people to ours, it is not credible to suggest that he has such a huge influence over Dan's that they would associate their good brand with ours unless they could see a benefit in doing so.

It simply serves to push an opinion to say things like a sponsor was "tossed to us by Mathieson".

Perspective and balance in opinion would be an interesting thing to bring to these arguments.

_________________
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Rhys26 wrote:
TheGame wrote:
bulls#$%! Essendon* would have taken them to court the same way Jack would of. But you voted Collo in.


Hey Game I think you full of crap!!!
Essendon* were penalised in 1999 for salary cup rorting - I think they were excluded from the 1st and 2nd round of the national draft and the preseason draft in 99.

In 2002 they off loaded carcella, hefferenan and blumfield, three premiership players so they could fit within the salary cup rules. They learnt their lesson we never did - Pigs Arse Elliot thought he was above the salary cup.

We paid the price for his cheating and deserved what we got - Elliot was great in the 80's but like your theories he is an outdated and obsolete now


Do a little more research before you label me. Essendon* cheated again in 03 or 04 when they bought Lloyd and Hird's extremely valuable:P internet rights. They got about an 80k or 90k fine, thats it. They were repeat offenders. They deliberately tried to make a mockery of the system as well and the AFL didn't do sh!t cause they are scared.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Quote:
Don't underestimate the value of an introduction ...

It's the key people who have influence over others, however indirectly, which allow a club and sponsors to get together and forge a relationship.


Dukes,

I agree wholeheartedly. However, for some on here to infer that we are shit and that we can only get sponsorships because they are "tossed" to us is absolute falacy.

Whilst Mathieson may well have introduced Dan's people to ours, it is not credible to suggest that he has such a huge influence over Dan's that they would associate their good brand with ours unless they could see a benefit in doing so.

It simply serves to push an opinion to say things like a sponsor was "tossed to us by Mathieson".

Perspective and balance in opinion would be an interesting thing to bring to these arguments.



Did you bring your umbrella along O R???

good to see you back.... long time ... :-D

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], piquet, Sydney Blue and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group