Psychologist wrote:
Would he have gone through a thorough interview process?
Good point. We went the 1970s route and appointed an old boy after Voss turned us down. Ratts is a great Carlton man, but if he was to be appointed as coach it needed to be an appointment (ag all opposition in a fair and thorough process), not an annointment.
Riley is the only guy with significant coaching experience. Teague, Lappin, Monty all had none and Ratts, the senior coach had a year as an AFL assistnat and then 2nd divvy suburban. Doesn't mean he can't coach, but why didn't we have a thorough process that involved looking seriously outside the club. And why was Lappin appointed again? Because it was a carrot to get him to retire? Knights is no one's idea of a coach but he out coaches our guys. After two and a half years you want the players to look like they understand the game plan. Anyone work out what the plan was last night? Anyone know why the players implemented whatever it was so poorly? This is a huge game. We could have been 3-0 but now might be 1-8. If we play the dreadful Crows back in to form Ratts will be under really serious pressure. He really needs to show that he can get the best out of the players.
We have no more excuses left if Freeo and the Dons go past us. We have had the cream of the draft over 6 years, our facilities are now the best around, we got Chris Judd, the footy dept is well resourced. It's time to deliver or change. It doesn't mean we win every week, but that at least we are competitive and have a coherent plan.