Sydney Blue wrote:
7dominator wrote:
By the way care to select us a Competitve team for the first round of 2003 based on the list supplied???
That list of players won more games in 2003 than we have this year and the majority of them took us to the finals in 2001
Allan - had a good year last year as did Murphy
Beaumont - disappointing this year but last year took more marks than any Carlton Player and would have been more valuable than clarke
Mckernan won our best and fairest in 2002 and would have been a better option than Mott.
Franchina was a tagger and better at it than Bannister or sporn
Hulme was good at in and under and better than johnston
Beasy wasn't given a go
McCormick wasnt that bad and probably better than Scotland
Doering is carving up the VFL
Davies showed promise but like many others like sporn - wiggins - livo- houlihan has gone no where .
And if the draft and the playing list is the only excuse you have for Pagan tell me why we didn't finish last - last year
I asked you to come up with reasons to backup your claims that we had a list that could have been competitive in 2003 and this is the best you could come up with ?????
Absolutely laughable!!!
Pick the side for me using the players that Pagan had at his disposal in 2003?
Show me the disgruntled players and then tell me what they have done elsewhere?
Methinks my analysis might just have shocked you as much as the more reasoned observer......
It was diabolical!
Perhaps whilst your thinking about a response perhaps you might like to addresss my earlier question re the "Ferals" who voted Elliott and Co out?
What camp were you in?
Discuss the legacy that Bigjack etc left?
Another viewing of the list might prove sobering again!