TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Carlton Goals - Round 7 http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10246 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Jarusa [ Sun May 14, 2006 10:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Carlton Goals - Round 7 |
17 Goals by the Blues was a great effort. Of those 17 goals the following players were involved with this many. 12 - Fevola 7 - Stevens 7 - Scotland 6 - Bentick 6 - Murphy 5 - McLaren 4 - Thornton 3 - Walker 2 - Simpson 2 - Betts 2 - Kouta 2 - Kennedy 2 - McGrath 2 - Whitnall 2 - Saddington And here are the Goals one by one Thornton Bentick Simpson Murphy Stevens ![]() Bentick Murphy Fevola Fisher ![]() DeLuca Bentick Scotland McGrath Murphy ![]() Fisher Thornton Saddington Walker Fevola ![]() Scotland Houlihan McLaren Stevens Murphy Saddington ![]() Scotland Walker Waite McLaren Wiggins Scotland Houlihan Simpson Fevola ![]() McLaren Stevens Walker Fisher Fevola ![]() Scotland Bentick McGrath McLaren Scotland Waite ![]() Stevens Bentick Whitnall Houlihan Bentick Stevens Fevola Murphy Kennedy ![]() Whitnall Thornton Houlihan Stevens Scotland Fevola ![]() Fevola Murphy ![]() Fevola Scotland ![]() Koutoufides Stevens Fevola ![]() Koutoufides Scotland Betts Kennedy ![]() Bentick Fevola ![]() McLaren Stevens Fevola Betts Waite Bentick ![]() Thornton Wiggins Fevola ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Sun May 14, 2006 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() |
Author: | Electric Blue [ Sun May 14, 2006 10:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
17 ey? A pretty important number for this footy club...... |
Author: | 4thchicken [ Sun May 14, 2006 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Jarusa - I'd quote you but if everyone did that it make take a few days to scroll down the thread ![]() Just a comment though with respect to players being involved in goals - I think you should only count direct goal assists/goals rather than everyone who has had a touch along the way - particularly given that some of those touches may not be 'clean' or 'direct' passages of play |
Author: | Jarusa [ Sun May 14, 2006 11:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
4thchicken wrote: Jarusa - I'd quote you but if everyone did that it make take a few days to scroll down the thread
![]() Just a comment though with respect to players being involved in goals - I think you should only count direct goal assists/goals rather than everyone who has had a touch along the way - particularly given that some of those touches may not be 'clean' or 'direct' passages of play Agreed, I generally like the direct assist stats as well, but I just thought it would be interesting to see a more general list of the players involved in plays that result in goals. Thing I like today were the number of Coast to Coast goals and goals from Stoppages and Centre Bounces. |
Author: | TheSheik [ Mon May 15, 2006 1:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Carlton Goals - Round 7 |
Jarusa wrote: 17 Goals by the Blues was a great effort.
Of those 17 goals the following players were involved with this many. 12 - Fevola 7 - Stevens 7 - Scotland 6 - Bentick 6 - Murphy 5 - McLaren 4 - Thornton 3 - Walker 2 - Simpson 2 - Betts 2 - Kouta 2 - Kennedy 2 - McGrath 2 - Whitnall 2 - Saddington And here are the Goals one by one Thornton Bentick Simpson Murphy Stevens ![]() Bentick Murphy Fevola Fisher ![]() DeLuca Bentick Scotland McGrath Murphy ![]() Fisher Thornton Saddington Walker Fevola ![]() Scotland Houlihan McLaren Stevens Murphy Saddington ![]() Scotland Walker Waite McLaren Wiggins Scotland Houlihan Simpson Fevola ![]() McLaren Stevens Walker Fisher Fevola ![]() Scotland Bentick McGrath McLaren Scotland Waite ![]() Stevens Bentick Whitnall Houlihan Bentick Stevens Fevola Murphy Kennedy ![]() Whitnall Thornton Houlihan Stevens Scotland Fevola ![]() Fevola Murphy ![]() Fevola Scotland ![]() Koutoufides Stevens Fevola ![]() Koutoufides Scotland Betts Kennedy ![]() Bentick Fevola ![]() McLaren Stevens Fevola Betts Waite Bentick ![]() Thornton Wiggins Fevola ![]() ![]() ![]() Are you breaching copyright at all by pinching these from the AFL site ??? |
Author: | Ponkstar [ Mon May 15, 2006 1:51 am ] |
Post subject: | |
By quoting them in your response Sheik I'd say you are too. ![]() |
Author: | Jarusa [ Mon May 15, 2006 7:37 am ] |
Post subject: | |
If the AFL have any problem with me providing EXTRA advertising for one of their sponsors I'm sure they will ask me to remove them. ![]() |
Author: | thegezman [ Mon May 15, 2006 8:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() i like this one ![]() |
Author: | TheSheik [ Mon May 15, 2006 9:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Jarusa wrote: If the AFL have any problem with me providing EXTRA advertising for one of their sponsors I'm sure they will ask me to remove them.
![]() It was a genuine question, it's hard to guage what is allowable and what is not these days. |
Author: | Jarusa [ Mon May 15, 2006 9:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
TheSheik wrote: Jarusa wrote: If the AFL have any problem with me providing EXTRA advertising for one of their sponsors I'm sure they will ask me to remove them. ![]() It was a genuine question, it's hard to guage what is allowable and what is not these days. These things are always questionable, but as long as you are not claiming credit for the work of others, not making money from it and not using it to slander anyone it is accepted even though technically it may be a breach of copyright. When you see the use of avatars and the constant posting of images on forums where they might appear for a day or two and then dissapear it is pretty hard to police. On FootyGeek I try to encourage people to use the images from that site on forums etc, because much like the AFL stuff above there is a watermark on the image (in my case the website address) so both parties get something, one an image they want to use and the other exposure for their product or advertiser. |
Author: | Sniff Wilson [ Mon May 15, 2006 9:55 am ] |
Post subject: | |
interesting seeings that the sexy squad were threatened with legal action by the AFL for having interviews with players on our site, for FREE download, but because the players appeared after training and such, and outside MC Labor Park, it was AFL intellectual property. oxymoron there huh....afl and intellectual in the same sentence. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |