TalkingCarlton
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

The A, B, C, D, E, F & G of Seasons End…
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10437		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  BrizzyBlue [ Tue May 23, 2006 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:  The A, B, C, D, E, F & G of Seasons End…
G’ Day Troops,

I have used the list of players who should be recontracted/retained at seasons end from my “Traditional End of Season Rebalanceâ€
Author:  blueslander [ Tue May 23, 2006 7:03 pm ]
Post subject: 
I guess removing the nucleous of the current side has to be done, but I also think that it is a little too early to be making predictions of Bower and Kennedy, but I love your enthusiasm and desire to outside the square.

Not a bad side in my limited opinion...
Author:  jimmae [ Tue May 23, 2006 8:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
Like who you have in the team, but I don't rate Bentick roaming around in the back pocket, he would be exploited.

In and under mid or bust for Bentick. If you don't see him playing in the midfield, then I'd put Carrazzo in his place.

So using the names you've already put up, I come up with this:

Backs:......Carrazzo, Hartlett, Thornton

H/Backs:..Bower, Big CHB, Russell

Centre:...Simpson, Classy Centre, Walker

H/Fors:....Houlihan, Kennedy, Waite

Forw:......Betts, Fevola, Fisher

Ruck:......Giant Ruck, Murphy, Stevens

Int:.........Aisake, Blackwell, Whitnall, Speedy mid

Emerg:...Bentick, McLaren, Flint

Something tells me you forgot about Whitnall. :)

Changes in bold, new recruits underlined.

My point? Most of the recruits would be in the ressies.

GAH no Houlihan, he'd be good on the HF flank.
Author:  BrizzyBlue [ Tue May 23, 2006 10:23 pm ]
Post subject: 
jimmae wrote:
Like who you have in the team, but I don't rate Bentick roaming around in the back pocket, he would be exploited. In and under mid or bust for Bentick.


I fully understand your point, but one critisism of AB is that he is purely in and under and doesn't go both ways. I don't necessarily agree with this but like Ratten a bit of time down back will do wonders for his defensive game

jimmae wrote:
My point? Most of the recruits would be in the ressies.


Jimbo, I understand this point, but I thought that I made it clear that this is a project youth side which will be a couple of years in the making. The point of the newbies being on the field whilst the experienced ones are on the bench is purely for illustration purposes.

Please re-read the post and particularly the bolded sections.

BrizzyBlue wrote:

Now adding these players to the core of quality kids that we already have, gives us a completely different look. Putting aside who may or may not be still on the list over the next couple of years, I have tried to imagine these 7 mythical players in our side and built a team around them. Only for illustrative purposes, I have put them in position and added the others, but it goes without saying that some existing players would be on the ground whilst the newbies probably would be on the pine.
Author:  jimmae [ Tue May 23, 2006 10:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sorry dude, missed that. Ok in that case my suggestion would be my own, for next year.

Very acheivable. :)
Author:  BrizzyBlue [ Tue May 23, 2006 11:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
jimmae wrote:
Sorry dude, missed that. Ok in that case my suggestion would be my own, for next year.

Very acheivable. :)


You are right IMHO. It looks good to me. 8)
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/