TalkingCarlton
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

@#$%&! you Sheahan
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10883		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  The Vet [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:32 pm ]
Post subject:  @#$%&! you Sheahan
My God, it is this sort of purile putrid crap that makes me want so bad to start winning again. Nothing short of vindictive and offensive. Salt in the wound. He has completely and utterly lost me forever. There was nothing objective about that.

@#$%&! YOU SHEAHAN, your paper and the shit you flew in on! When the time is ripe you and your fat arse cronies will get your comeuppance.

And there will be no relenting then.

Oh no, there will be no relenting then.....

[url=http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,19439895%255E19762,00.html]Blues unable to match Eagles' self-belief
[/url]

Quote:
Forget that stuff about Collingwood and sympathy.

Carlton supporters have been bragging for 30-odd years about a certain Grand Final, when the Blues came from 44 points down at halftime to win by 10.

At Collingwood's expense.

Nuh, there will be no sympathy from the Collingwood fraternity.

Quote:
For Carlton, the 10-1 outsider going into the game, it might be the most bitter of all the disappointments to confront the club in the past three or four years.


Quote:
Collingwood supporters cheered.
Author:  TheGame [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:38 pm ]
Post subject: 
Do you want pity?
Author:  malbi [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
The first and the third quotes would be accurate. Collingwood supporters on a whole wouldn't care about our plight. They don't want to see us out of existence. They just want to see us keep losing.

However, this loss last weekend was nowhere near as bad as Round 22 in 2003 against the Kangaroos at Telstra Dome. To me that was our worst lost and when we were at our lowest ebb.
Author:  AGRO [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
I posted this in another thread - but this article by Sheahan is really a sad and puerile piece from a so called senior football journalist.

How you could come up with a "Collingwood angle" in an article about a meritorious performance by a well drilled, tough West Coast Eagles side and an inexperienced and young Carlton side is completely beyond comprehension.

There is no possible connection you could make about this game to Collingwood so you invented some fantasy about Collingwood supporters not wanting to feel sorry for Carlton supporters for a loss in these circumstances

You are a total flower Sheahan.

If you bothered to get some feedback from Carlton Supporters you would know that the vast majority were well proud of their young teams efforts in running the Premier team of the competition to within 2 kicks in the hostile enviroment of Subiaco - you really have no clue Sheahan and the angle you invented for this article is a testament to the fact that you are more interested in invective and vitriol than your so called pathetic efforts to be "impartial" :roll: and report the game as it is. :roll:
Author:  malbi [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
AGRO wrote:
How you could come up with a "Collingwood angle" in an article about a meritorious performance by a well drilled, tough West Coast Eagles side and an inexperienced and young Carlton side is completely beyond comprehension.

AGRO wrote:
There is no possible connection you could make about this game to Collingwood so you invented some fantasy about Collingwood supporters not wanting to feel sorry for Carlton supporters for a loss in these circumstances

The connection is that it was one of the best come from behind wins in history of the game. The margin of 44 points was the same that Carlton came from behind in 1970 to win the premiership. This article was in yesterday's paper when Collingwood was playing.

Seriously guys, get over it.
Author:  AGRO [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
malleefowl wrote:
Seriously guys, get over it.



You cant be serious malleefowl - the angle on this story of course is the come from behind victory - but the margin of 44 points is merely a coincidence and is an extremely long bow to draw.

Mike Sheahan deliberately set out to belittle a brave Carlton performance by ludicrously suggesting that Collingwood supporters would have no pity on Carlton in these circumstances.

But why didn't he suggest the same thing in his articles last week about West Coast and Geelong.
Author:  magic [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:01 pm ]
Post subject: 
He's a goose, let him write his crap, we will show everyone. We will make all the doubters eat their words.
Author:  moshe25 [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
Well honestly you CAN see the similarities. I mean, coming back from 44 points down in a GRAND FINAL to win a PREMIERSHIP against ANOTHER grand finalist who lost their 4th Grand Final in 11 years is very similar to the top team beating the 15th team in a meaningless mid-season game when the only thing at stake for that 15th placed team is a number 1 draft pick.

If you write enough articles you could make enough money to buy some perspective (and use the change to get some journalistic integrity).
Author:  bluegirldanielle [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:09 pm ]
Post subject: 
moshe25 wrote:
Well honestly you CAN see the similarities. I mean, coming back from 44 points down in a GRAND FINAL to win a PREMIERSHIP against ANOTHER grand finalist who lost their 4th Grand Final in 11 years is very similar to the top team beating the 15th team in a meaningless mid-season game when the only thing at stake for that 15th placed team is a number 1 draft pick.

If you write enough articles you could make enough money to buy some perspective (and use the change to get some journalistic integrity).


noice moshe!! I read it this morning & raised an eybrow at it - and then spilled my coffee on the paper. It was an accident I promise 8)
Author:  Navy One [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
Not so sure about his last sentence about the Collingwood supporters cheering ....
By beating the Eagles we'd do them a favour but as it happens they now trail them by 8 points.
Author:  AGRO [ Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
bluegirldanielle wrote:
noice moshe!! I read it this morning & raised an eybrow at it - and then spilled my coffee on the paper. It was an accident I promise 8)



I didn't spill my coffee on it - but the new puppy we bought sure found a good use for it. :wink:

Oh and most eloquently put moshe. :wink:
Author:  kingkerna [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:24 am ]
Post subject: 
He has written a lot worse then this, hasn't really sunk the boots in to us & reminds the scum about THAT grand final again. Although I do think he could have actually written something intelligent about the game.
Author:  Synbad [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:34 am ]
Post subject: 
does anyone really read sheahans articles?
Author:  The Duke [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:56 am ]
Post subject: 
Navy One wrote:
Not so sure about his last sentence about the Collingwood supporters cheering ....
By beating the Eagles we'd do them a favour but as it happens they now trail them by 8 points.


Eggszackery!!

If the collingwouldnts weren't cheering for us on Sunday, then there's definbately something wrong with them.

I'll take the 44 point come from behind grand final victory against all odds over the filth every time, Mike 8) But thanks for pointing it out all the same 8) 8) 8)
Author:  AGRO [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:15 am ]
Post subject: 
Synbad wrote:
does anyone really read sheahans articles?



I accidentally stepped in it whilst looking for some World Cup articles. :wink:
Author:  Rhys26 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:05 am ]
Post subject: 
AGRO wrote:
Synbad wrote:
does anyone really read sheahans articles?



I accidentally stepped in it whilst looking for some World Cup articles. :wink:


Thank God it was just just an accident....was gonna say I thought you were smarter then that.
Author:  BlueBern [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
Did anyone else notice that the score of 111-101 was the same as the 1970 GF?
Author:  moshe25 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
There have been around 17,000 matches of League footy. You'd expect that a few of them might have the same scores as a few others.

Of more interest to me was that Carlton's no 25 did ok in both games too. (Freaky, eh?......Twilight Zone music....)
Author:  true_blue3 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
moshe25 wrote:
Well honestly you CAN see the similarities. I mean, coming back from 44 points down in a GRAND FINAL to win a PREMIERSHIP against ANOTHER grand finalist who lost their 4th Grand Final in 11 years is very similar to the top team beating the 15th team in a meaningless mid-season game when the only thing at stake for that 15th placed team is a number 1 draft pick.

If you write enough articles you could make enough money to buy some perspective (and use the change to get some journalistic integrity).


stole my thunder moshe but i dont think i would have worded it as good as u great work
Author:  true_blue3 [ Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
BlueBern wrote:
Did anyone else notice that the score of 111-101 was the same as the 1970 GF?


holy shit i thought u might have been joking then i went and checked it up that really is freaky too bad we received a cup when we won
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/