TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Get Carrazzo Up! http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11350 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | nikki [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Get Carrazzo Up! |
Don't let Davey beat him Vote for Carrots here: http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=toyota&spg=goty (May need to replace caltonfc with afl) |
Author: | Jeremias Pablo [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
come on people, vote for Carrots-he is currently getting spanked by Davey. Double Andy's votes ![]() ![]() Seriously, how good were both goals! Davey's was just ridiculous, he has so much skill. Carrots' was also very good, I certainly jumped out of my seat. What annoys me though is that he can kick those sorts, but misses the simple set shots from 15 metres out ![]() |
Author: | bluegirldanielle [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Currently on 31% with Davey on 62%. C'mon everyone, get behind Carrots for once!! |
Author: | bax [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not after that miss from 15 meters out ![]() |
Author: | bluegirldanielle [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
bax wrote: Not after that miss from 15 meters out
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | jack_4 [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
How ironic- it is pick 2 V pick 3 in the 2003 Rookie Draft. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
No, Davey's goal was better ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
bluegirldanielle wrote: bax wrote: Not after that miss from 15 meters out ![]() ![]() ![]() Funny, as outrageous as that sounds, at that point, it probably would have ![]() |
Author: | thehalford [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | |
bluegirldanielle wrote: Currently on 31% with Davey on 62%. C'mon everyone, get behind Carrots for once!!
Who's on 7% then? I'm really shat off about AD's goal. It was pretty much the only thing that would have been able to beat the fluke from our ol' mate Carrots. And everyone bloody wetting themselves over it doesn't help any. ![]() |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
thehalford wrote: bluegirldanielle wrote: Currently on 31% with Davey on 62%. C'mon everyone, get behind Carrots for once!! Who's on 7% then?: Matthew Robbins I think, his goal wasn't bad either. |
Author: | bluegirldanielle [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nick wrote: bluegirldanielle wrote: bax wrote: Not after that miss from 15 meters out ![]() ![]() ![]() Funny, as outrageous as that sounds, at that point, it probably would have ![]() You're right about one thing Nick - that is outrageous. I understand it was a sitter that was missed but are you seriously saying that, had he have kicked the goal, we would not have lost by 65 points??? Outrageous indeed ![]() |
Author: | true_blue3 [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
the experts say davey 40%, carrots 39% and the gap in the public vote has been decreased to 55%for davey and 40% for carrots, not looking ood for him we need more people voting!! |
Author: | rhys87 [ Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: No, Davey's goal was better
my thoughts as well. |
Author: | fullmont101 [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
C'mon gang, Davey has been cut down to 51%. |
Author: | tommi [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
That's it......... i'm voting...........! i've never been in a "gang" before...............thanks Clintee........! kindest regards tommi |
Author: | thehalford [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
bluegirldanielle wrote: Nick wrote: bluegirldanielle wrote: bax wrote: Not after that miss from 15 meters out ![]() ![]() ![]() Funny, as outrageous as that sounds, at that point, it probably would have ![]() You're right about one thing Nick - that is outrageous. I understand it was a sitter that was missed but are you seriously saying that, had he have kicked the goal, we would not have lost by 65 points??? Outrageous indeed ![]() Not as outrageous as you're making it out to be. Had he not ballsed up the kick, we'd have been less than 10 points down at QT with more confidence - that great intangible. What effect did 2.5 vs 5.0 have on the playing group considering that at least 3 of the 5 behinds were very gettable? Probably a lot. If we'd kicked straight, we'd have given a much better account of ourselves. The Carrazzo Gang - has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? ![]() |
Author: | DownUnderChick [ Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I agree with what your saying TheHalford. Confidence is a wonderful thing and when you miss from 15 metres out and kick into the man on the mark to boot, it's crushing to the morale of the fans. So I can only imagine/wonder how it will crush the players. |
Author: | fullmont101 [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:44 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Are you guys for real? You cant tell me when Carrazzo took the mark and went back to line up for goal people were thinking that he was really going to kick it. I was sitting around a heap of fans and they were all saying that it could still go anywhere, I was the only 1 who said he would kick it and when he missed I got pointed at and laughed. That 1 goal was not a game turner, and if you think it was your kidding yourself. What about 3 hit the posts in the same qtr or the fact that we cant man up and consistantly turn the ball over? |
Author: | thehalford [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
No, shit no, Fullmont. I was expecting him to balls it up as well and was sadly correct. BUT that miss along with the 3 posters would have sapped confidence pretty badly - especially that kick, considering it was so bloody easy. Not a game turner, but a game-path-confirmer. We had a chance pre kick. As soon as it left the boot we were [REDACTED] is what I'm saying. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |