TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
The Age (13 December) http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13862 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | The Vet [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:48 am ] |
Post subject: | The Age (13 December) |
Blues board vetoed selection: Zantuck Tall for one: Blues show lofty hopes Carlton nabs Young mature-age prospect |
Author: | Blue Bird [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 7:51 am ] |
Post subject: | |
*sigh* - who is running the joint??? |
Author: | JackWorrall [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Given Zantuck's history, I find it difficult to give his story much credence. |
Author: | billc3 [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:47 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Good on the Board (or MC or Hughes- more likely!) This says it all Quote: Zantuck said he regretted requesting a trade from Richmond and ending up at Essendon*. "I got crucified at Essendon*. I missed one session and all of a sudden I'm this big bad guy stuffing up the club."
If you ever wanted a serious warning bell....there it is....reminds me of Pierre the c**ksucker - " You suck just one c***....." (sorry mods- can't bear the poor old Zantuck (and Pagan ) victim crap on the radio at the moment) |
Author: | Jarusa [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm so glad we did not draft Zantuck. Whoever the hell did it, thank you. |
Author: | AIRCAV [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Spot on Jack. Fancy basing a story on what the person who missed out says. We've done our bit for wayward footballers and got bitten. |
Author: | Wojee [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Zantuck's comments seem more like sour grapes than anything. |
Author: | drsilvagni [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Not sure whether this has been mentioned elsewhere but evidently Pagan confirmed on SEN that the board had vetoed Zantuck's selection |
Author: | Dukes [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Wayne Hughes was on SEN this morning and said the decision on the seocnd player in the PSD was made after Bryan didn't accept the new contract offer. We needed to replace him with another tall and Zantuck was the odd man out despite training well. No conspiracy theories here - we just addressed a list deficiency and I'm happy with that. |
Author: | bluehotel [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
i agree Dukes. If Bryan had stayed they propbaly would have gone for Zantuck. Casseman gave a hint that height was the overiding factor. |
Author: | Mordan [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:49 am ] |
Post subject: | |
bluehotel wrote: i agree Dukes. If Bryan had stayed they propbaly would have gone for Zantuck.
If Bryan had stayed, we wouldn't have had an empty spot on the main list for either Zantuck or Cloke. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |