TalkingCarlton :: View topic

I seem to have forgotten the reason why some punters have been calling for malouf's head. Can somebody refresh my memory

so which board member are you sal - smorgon?

This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors.

Sal wrote:

Yeah I too remember how it was seen as such a coup when we got him, and can't see how he's suddenly apparently got no idea what he's doing. With Malouf it seems more a case of guilt by association - i.e. he is identified with the current board much of which most people want removed and hence they want Malouf gone too.

Sal wrote:

How could you possibly screw up the Melbourne Council deal?

I seem to have forgotten the reason why some punters have been calling for malouf's head. Can somebody refresh my memory

No I'm not as you ask, if it were my decision that amoeba would go

Michael M. is a lovely,intelligent guy.
And has the CFC at heart.

Michael M. is a lovely,intelligent guy.
And has the CFC at heart.
But ,I did note in Readers Digest,that drinking and smoking is bad for my health-so I cancelled my subscription to Readers Digest.

Enjoy the off season.

Author:	Sal [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:04 am ]
Post subject:	Malouf
I seem to have forgotten the reason why some punters have been calling for malouf's head. Can somebody refresh my memory

Author:	Synbad [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:33 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Malouf
Sal wrote: I seem to have forgotten the reason why some punters have been calling for malouf's head. Can somebody refresh my memory It would have nothing to do with how he is responsible for the way the club is travelling finacially and its standing in the business and corporate world as a brand.. and all those new sources of income he has established in his power punch ways as CEO...

Author:	grrofunger [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:42 am ]
Post subject:
so which board member are you sal - smorgon?

Author:	Sal [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:42 am ]
Post subject:
This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors.

Author:	Sal [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:55 am ]
Post subject:
grrofunger wrote: so which board member are you sal - smorgon? No I'm not as you ask, if it were my decision that amoeba would go, who are you Pago Pago

TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Malouf http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13929	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Blues2005 [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:57 am ]
Post subject:
Sal wrote: This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors. Yeah I too remember how it was seen as such a coup when we got him, and can't see how he's suddenly apparently got no idea what he's doing. With Malouf it seems more a case of guilt by association - i.e. he is identified with the current board much of which most people want removed and hence they want Malouf gone too.

Author:	Synbad [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:08 am ]
Post subject:
Blues2005 wrote: Sal wrote: This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors. Yeah I too remember how it was seen as such a coup when we got him, and can't see how he's suddenly apparently got no idea what he's doing. With Malouf it seems more a case of guilt by association - i.e. he is identified with the current board much of which most people want removed and hence they want Malouf gone too. Really??? dont you have a clue what a CEO is/does? Now why would Fitzpatrick give us a businessplan to work on and we reject it? Why was Watts sent to the club?? Naivety isnt a good thing.

Author:	mjonc [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:46 am ]
Post subject:
Sal wrote: This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors. How could you possibly screw up the Melbourne Council deal?

Author:	woof [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:29 am ]
Post subject:
mjonc wrote: Sal wrote: This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors. How could you possibly screw up the Melbourne Council deal? People not paying parking fines

Author:	Blue Vain [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:57 am ]
Post subject:
Now he has aligned himself with Smorgon, he will suffer the same consequences. As you said a week ago Sal, Smorgons got to go!

Author:	marciblue [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:51 am ]
Post subject:
My understanding was that he was recruited to facilitate the PP redevlopment process and his previous standing with the MCC was going to help get a slightly reluctant council to tip in funds. Now that this objective has been achieved, his worth is very little as he has underachieved in so many other areas

Author:	Wild Blue Yonder [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:05 am ]
Post subject:
Reportedly on about $250k at MCC, so the move to CFC would have seen a rise -it's probably in the annual report somewhere? Value for money? Nope.

Author:	CK95 [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:54 pm ]
Post subject:
Sal wrote: I seem to have forgotten the reason why some punters have been calling for malouf's head. Can somebody refresh my memory Sal wrote: This is the bit that's lost on me. His business accumen is very good, is well regarded for his role with the City of Melbourne and what he delivered there. Is he being hamstrung by various members of the board? I don't know but blokes with his grounding just don't forget how to report a P/L and source sponsors. Sal wrote: No I'm not as you ask, if it were my decision that amoeba would go

Author:	DownUnderChick [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:24 pm ]
Post subject:
WTF is Sal?

Author:	tommi [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:50 pm ]
Post subject:
Go BANANAS Dee Oh Ay.............. the word on the street is.........there's a Beatles band playing at the Echuca/Moama R.S.L. early in the year..........! you must join said band.....for the ceremonial burning of tobacco.......! kindest regards tommi

Author:	Synbad [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:
MM is a likeable chap indeed... but he has gravely underperformed in his primary role which is to turn the clubs fortunes around . Four years in the job he has contributed very little to the structures needed to act as cornerstones for this club going forward. The AFL (Watts report) assesment of him was said to be savage .So much so that he briefed members of the board with a censored version of it... censored by himself... Smorgon was the other who saw the original. He has allowed himself to be involved in the day to day politicking of this football club to save his job ... instead of working on sustainable structures. He has very little confidence from many within the board and the people who are keeping this club alive right now.. (AFL and NAB) *He will cop it in the neck simulatenously with smorgon come election time. We really cant keep going on like this ...

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	DOA [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:
Michael M. is a lovely,intelligent guy. And has the CFC at heart. But ,I did note in Readers Digest,that drinking and smoking is bad for my health-so I cancelled my subscription to Readers Digest. Enjoy the off season.

Author:	Sal [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:45 pm ]
Post subject:
What's your point CK95 ?

Author:	budzy [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:
DOA wrote: Michael M. is a lovely,intelligent guy. And has the CFC at heart. don't think anyone would disagree DOA, but that's not the point...

Author:	Blue Vain [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:
DOA wrote: Michael M. is a lovely,intelligent guy. And has the CFC at heart. But ,I did note in Readers Digest,that drinking and smoking is bad for my health-so I cancelled my subscription to Readers Digest. Enjoy the off season. Luke Livingston was also a lovely intelligent guy with the CFC at heart, DOA. I was disappointed to see him go but then again, I felt for Sean O'Keefe as well. You need more than great character to succeed at a high level and Malouf would be well aware of that. In dealings I've had with him, I've found him to be a great guy and I actually believe he is a reasonable administrator but he has allowed his position to be politically manipulated. If he is a casualty of Smorgons ticket, that is now his decision.