TalkingCarlton
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Bentley
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25338		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  budzy [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Bentley
So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?
Author:  brad2311 [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Belongs in TalkingPlayers


oh wait that lines been used :banghead:



Honestly dont see the value of him in the side just yet. That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience
Author:  camel [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
...rhythm ace.
Author:  Navy Blue Horse [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
brad2311 wrote:
That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience


Yeah we should drop him....don't come back until you have more experience at senior level son :donk:
Author:  bosman [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
brad2311 wrote:

Honestly dont see the value of him in the side just yet. That missed shepperd for Judd showed the inexperience


Don't like him, simple as that, never to play seniors again..... That shepherd and also another he missed, no excuse.

You don't need to be blessed with skills to do the 1%...
Author:  budzy [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
budzy wrote:
So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?


?
Author:  The Normal One [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
No idea who he was promoted for, but surely the paper work could be withdrawn and Ellard promoted?

Bentley isn't up to AFL.
Author:  bondiblue [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Nah
Author:  septembergurl [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Can't all rookies play after round 11, as part of the gold coast concessions deal?
Author:  Orangewhip [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
:clap:

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.

Where the Russell thread Richmondites?
Author:  jimmae [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
septembergurl wrote:
Can't all rookies play after round 11, as part of the gold coast concessions deal?

Nup, just the one promotion.

Every time he is involved in a chain of possession, no matter how small his role, he finds a way to make things difficult for his team mates. Not up to scratch, get him out of there.
Author:  lara #25 [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
i thought he was better than his hawthorn game. obviously made a few mistakes, one in particular gave freo an easy goal... BUT he has a bit of grunt and at least puts his head over the ball, which is something some of our players still fail to do. i think give him another chance and see how he goes, that way it can be decided whether to scrap him or not at the end of the year
Author:  Agro jr [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
He definatley does try and put his body in.

He actually does have a bit of experience about him, hes played 23 games which is a season of footy stretching over two clubs.

He's very gutsy and hard in and under, but I just dont understand what the point of him playing was?

Subiaco is...Big
Big means theres a lot of open spaces.
Open Spaces mean certain players can use there speed
Bentley doesnt have speed
Yarran does.

Why not give Yarran a go in his homestate on a big ground.

That's what we lacked today, we werent able to take advantage of the open spaces that Subi offers by selecting Bentley.
Author:  Teddy [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
lara #25 wrote:
i thought he was better than his hawthorn game...


My five year olds Auskick game last week was better than Bentley's Hawthorn game.
Author:  Blue Beatle [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Orangewhip wrote:
:clap:

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.




yes but bently made no attempt to put a block on the player coming from behind to protect judd and give him a clear passage to goal- dumb footy. but then he wasn't the only carlton player who just watched after disposing of the ball by hand.
Author:  Blueboy_Dan [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Image

I like this one better than our one
Author:  99prelim [ Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Orangewhip wrote:
:clap:

Well done kneejerkers.

Off the bench today, Bentley was effective and did his job with the limited time he had. Well done Ratts for keeping him on after the Judd mishap- however- JUDD CALLED FOR IT.

Where the Russell thread Richmondites?


probably gone missing......just like your credibility after calling Grigg a @#$% champion in the Pros and Cons thread. You're obviously very easily impressed.
Author:  jimmae [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
budzy wrote:
So was he elevated again due to Waiteys LTI?

Sorry - no one's really addressed this. That's a possibility, or the round 11 auto-nomination.

Paperwork may have been put in for him to come up due to Walker's injury after Bentick returned also.

There should be opportunity for Garlett to be elevated again after Warnock resumes.
Author:  Nicko Carstairs [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Hmmm after just watching the game on Austar IQ (work) I hate to say it but IMHO he was not that bad. He stuffed up a couple of times (one really bad forward entry), but he played ok. Looked like a great game compared to his hawks game which was terrible. He was ok today. Some good aggresion at times. I agree with Orangewhip. Did his job.
Author:  Humpers [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bentley
Do we really need him in the side?
It's like the dark days of Paganism all over again.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/