TalkingCarlton :: View topic - Bottom to Top: the lists of Carlton v WCE

(We asked The Ghost but he kept on talking about how we miss Ragsy Gould!)

Quote:

(We asked The Ghost but he kept on talking about how we miss Ragsy Gould!)

Just spat my gin out all over the desk.... :wink:

Thank you Mr Molsey, that was a good piece.

camelboy wrote:

Thank you Mr Molsey, that was a good piece.

Thank you mr.camelboy. A few references to salary cap penalties were removed from the final article.

No financial inducement anywhere Camelboy, still (& always) on a volunteer basis.

:lol:

Actually, having time to think some more about the article, I realised that a lot of our late picks were in 2002/3. Because of the draft penalties - we wouldn't have used them had we still had picks 1, 2, 31, 34 and so on, would we?

Also, what were traded players counted as? I'm assuming blokes like Teague, Morrell were counted as rookies, so why wasn't David Clarke counted as father/son?

BUMP !@!!!!!

Gerard and Dwayne just talking about the article - onya Molsey / Jarusa

They said they got an email from Mike and Dan, and pretty much read out most of the article. Agreed that stats didn't mean that much, when looking at average ages, heights, etc. Said we had suffered at the draft.
I think they were impressed with the research.

Author:	molsey [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:	Bottom to Top: the lists of Carlton v WCE
http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... eid=207597 Thanks Jarusa for all your help

Author:	thehalford [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:09 pm ]
Post subject:
Nice. Very nice.

Author:	strangeblue [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:
Quote: (We asked The Ghost but he kept on talking about how we miss Ragsy Gould!) Just spat my gin out all over the desk....

Author:	true blue [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:14 pm ]
Post subject:
Makes me sick, bring on the priority pick !!

Author:	The Tyrant [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:
Carlton = 1/West Coast

TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Bottom to Top: the lists of Carlton v WCE http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2767	Page 1 of 2

Author:	camel [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:
Thank you Mr Molsey, that was a good piece.

Author:	phoenix johnson [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:
strangeblue wrote: Quote: (We asked The Ghost but he kept on talking about how we miss Ragsy Gould!) Just spat my gin out all over the desk.... And Jezza, don't forget Jezza.

Author:	blueman [ Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:
Now lets see. Finish last, pick no1 and 2 in draft = 2 ready mades - for the midfield to help Stevens, (hopefully) koutas swansong year. ppd no 1 - best uncontracted defender for chb. - to help Livo Thornton Teague and Carazzo plus pick no 17 (approx). Russell and Hartlett debuts sometime in 2006, Bryan and French in - Bryan spending a bit of time in defence but swapping with Barney in the ruck. Forward line - Waite OHailpin and Fevola Havent filled all the spots in, but Id say that starting to look like a much better football team than we have now...

Author:	molsey [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:49 am ]
Post subject:
camelboy wrote: Thank you Mr Molsey, that was a good piece. Thank you mr.camelboy. A few references to salary cap penalties were removed from the final article.

Author:	camel [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:34 am ]
Post subject:
molsey wrote: camelboy wrote: Thank you Mr Molsey, that was a good piece. Thank you mr.camelboy. A few references to salary cap penalties were removed from the final article. Following some sort of financial inducement I trust.

Author:	molsey [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:54 am ]
Post subject:
No financial inducement anywhere Camelboy, still (& always) on a volunteer basis.

Author:	Jarusa [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:06 am ]
Post subject:
molsey wrote: No financial inducement anywhere Camelboy, still (& always) on a volunteer basis. but the ghost is on a 650K backloaded contract. ... and showing absolutely no leadership

Author:	molsey [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:07 am ]
Post subject:
I'm just a gigolo, and everywhere I go, people know the part I'm playing. Great sig Jarusa. One of my favourite songs.

Author:	thehalford [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:09 am ]
Post subject:
Actually, having time to think some more about the article, I realised that a lot of our late picks were in 2002/3. Because of the draft penalties - we wouldn't have used them had we still had picks 1, 2, 31, 34 and so on, would we? Also, what were traded players counted as? I'm assuming blokes like Teague, Morrell were counted as rookies, so why wasn't David Clarke counted as father/son?

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	molsey [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:12 am ]
Post subject:
thehalford wrote: :lol: Actually, having time to think some more about the article, I realised that a lot of our late picks were in 2002/3. Because of the draft penalties - we wouldn't have used them had we still had picks 1, 2, 31, 34 and so on, would we? Also, what were traded players counted as? I'm assuming blokes like Teague, Morrell were counted as rookies, so why wasn't David Clarke counted as father/son? 1. Yes, but we couldn't exactly write an article all about how the AFL pantsed us, could we? Thanks for reading between the lines and getting to the point! 2. It was all based on original draftp ositions. I tried to exclude all the draft no. of father sons but completely forgot about David Clarke. He mustn't be at the forefront of my mind when it comes to Carlton, funny about that.

Author:	dongatwitch [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:09 pm ]
Post subject:
BUMP !@!!!!! Gerard and Dwayne just talking about the article - onya Molsey / Jarusa

Author:	Jarusa [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:19 pm ]
Post subject:
dongatwitch wrote: BUMP !@!!!!! Gerard and Dwayne just talking about the article - onya Molsey / Jarusa coolio, thanks for that info. what did they say?

Author:	dongatwitch [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:
They said they got an email from Mike and Dan, and pretty much read out most of the article. Agreed that stats didn't mean that much, when looking at average ages, heights, etc. Said we had suffered at the draft. I think they were impressed with the research.

Author:	Jarusa [ Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:
dongatwitch wrote: They said they got an email from Mike and Dan, and pretty much read out most of the article. Agreed that stats didn't mean that much, when looking at average ages, heights, etc. Said we had suffered at the draft. I think they were impressed with the research. hehe, cheers for that. molsey, shameless self promoter.

Author:	molsey [ Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:46 am ]
Post subject:
dongatwitch wrote: They said they got an email from Mike and Dan, and pretty much read out most of the article. Agreed that stats didn't mean that much, when looking at average ages, heights, etc. Said we had suffered at the draft. I think they were impressed with the research. Didn't get anything from me! And Dan isn't available at the moment.... must have been someone at the Club. Now that feels good though, very impressed. I've finally made it (on to a bankrupt radio station?)