therubbernub wrote:
Quote:
What was the reason for the article. I've read it a couple of times & can't figure out the basis
People make statements in the media- they trigger a response. Pagan makes statements about the salary cap penalties(ancient history- why bring it up- unless you are making excuses........) this triggers a response from Smith. That is why he wrote the article in response to Pagans public dredging up of the penalties.
In other words the 'reason for" the article is to respond to Pagans public critisisms of our draft penalties.
If you cant see this then you are just showing the same sort of bias against Smith as he shows against Carlton
Draft penalties have been done to death in the media. Some still do it to death in this forum. Isn’t there anything else to report on about Carlton other than Collo’s health, conflict of interest & draft penalties? Is there nothing else news worthy about the Blues?
With reference to the penalties, I think everybody in the football community understands at least part of what happened & the implications associated. I don’t care if Pagan wants to mention it at every press conference (which is a separate issue in it’s self), does it have to be continually reported? And don’t tell me that the journalists are obligated to report this stuff. Ask a different question at the press conference & get a different story. To simply re-hash old reports & up date them with some current stats is being simple minded?
If you’re professional in your approach to your job, then why not report fresh newsworthy articles. If you’re going to continue to report this rubbish, then you might as well go & work for the Picture magazine. Great scoop Patrick……â€