titimus wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
Why bloody not, I say.
If he wants to play CHF I'd let him.
He's taken to every other position he's played in. Knowing him he'll become a really dominant CHF for years. So what's the harm?
"oh Tyrant... but what about our horrible defence? We will certainly lose without Thornton in defence.....!!!!"
you mean, and spoil all the winning we're doing at the moment???
If Thornton's this "upset dude who can't play the spot he wants", I say, let him play where he wants FFS! I strongly believe that players should have a chance to make their mark where they want it to be made. He's been a wonderful defender for us. Now lets see WHAT ELSE he can do.
2 matchwinning forwards would hardly hurt us now would it.
Kouta can play in defence to get some touch.
And Whitnall can play.... well....... whatever!
If he wants to play CHF I'd let him.
He's taken to every other position he's played in. Knowing him he'll become a really dominant CHF for years. So what's the harm?
"oh Tyrant... but what about our horrible defence? We will certainly lose without Thornton in defence.....!!!!"
you mean, and spoil all the winning we're doing at the moment???
If Thornton's this "upset dude who can't play the spot he wants", I say, let him play where he wants FFS! I strongly believe that players should have a chance to make their mark where they want it to be made. He's been a wonderful defender for us. Now lets see WHAT ELSE he can do.
2 matchwinning forwards would hardly hurt us now would it.
Kouta can play in defence to get some touch.
And Whitnall can play.... well....... whatever!
..Didn't you start a thread recently assuming that Walker was the 'unhappy young player'?
Covering all bases?
just following the bounce of the ball
