molsey wrote:
ps. what do the other 17% of people think?
What are the stats?
| TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Caught 22 - article on the website / Mike & Dan http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3336 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | molsey [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Caught 22 - article on the website / Mike & Dan |
http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... eid=212237 Stats lie, I know they do. According to this our key players look OK, if we just ignore that worrying trough to the next tier, then maybe we'd be more competitive. Yes, of course I'm ignoring effectiveness but the tables are too big anyway! Interesting - Waite v Whitnall, very similar stats. Let the discussion commence! |
|
| Author: | Jarusa [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
stats, pffft 83% of people know they don't mean anything. |
|
| Author: | The Shag [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
the interesting thing is...over 90% of those 83% post here... |
|
| Author: | molsey [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
An interesting spin would be to divide Average state by average time on ground - I couldn't find these collated anywhere, other than the Herald Sun article on the weekend which seem to do it. ps. what do the other 17% of people think? |
|
| Author: | killpies [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
molsey wrote: ps. what do the other 17% of people think?
What are the stats?
|
|
| Author: | ryan2000 [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yes but on 55% of those 83% really believe it...............the other 40% are just following the trend. The remainding 5% were drunk on 4.5% booze ~! What the hell was i talking about? |
|
| Author: | dannyboy [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gone already...... 
|
|
| Author: | billc3 [ Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
....and 90% of stats are false |
|
| Author: | molsey [ Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Back to the article.... I think this shows, either through actual performance (Sporn) or time allowed on the ground (Prenders) the major reason for our decline in 2005. So many of our second and third tier players just can'tget it at the moment. |
|
| Author: | Jarusa [ Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Exactly molsey. It could almost be called the 'second rounder' syndrome. The structure of our list is all out of whack. We have far fewer second round (and therefore second tier) type players on the list than other clubs. We tried to make up for our lack of second tier players by using the recylced players. This year most of our 'second tier' has gone backwards significantly. |
|
| Author: | BlueWorld [ Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Johnson is the only one of the 'retreads' to have improved. All the others are down. |
|
| Author: | molsey [ Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
BlueWorld wrote: Johnson is the only one of the 'retreads' to have improved. All the others are down.
Yes, in terms of stats. In terms of games played though, McGrath has improved in 2005, suggesting that Pagan either sees a future for McGRath or we're that deficient in the half back flanks (noting omissions of WIggins, Sporn) that he is a must have in the back line. I guess we should also define retreads as 2004 recycled players - French is having a great year and his improvement has been acknowledged. |
|
| Author: | NTBlue [ Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jarusa wrote: stats, pffft
83% of people know they don't mean anything. And the other 27% can't add. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|