TalkingCarlton :: View topic - The Weekend Results

The results on the weekend showed two things.

1. That teams do not tank

2. That teams do not want to finish last.

And that is good enough for me.

I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ?

The results on the weekend showed two things.

1. That teams do not tank

2. That teams do not want to finish last.

And that is good enough for me.

I think Pagan might have a better idea than some bloke posting on a forum :roll:

BlueMark wrote:

The results on the weekend showed two things.

1. That teams do not tank

2. That teams do not want to finish last.

And that is good enough for me.

Missed your contributions last week after a loss, but it's good to have you back 'fair weather'. :wink:

Deano Supremo wrote:

I think Pagan might have a better idea than some bloke posting on a forum :roll:

Bite your tongue Deano.

If anyone thinks that Collingwood wasnt out to lose, they should be following another sport

79Vintage wrote:

BlueMark wrote:

The results on the weekend showed two things.

1. That teams do not tank

2. That teams do not want to finish last.

And that is good enough for me.

Missed your contributions last week after a loss, but it's good to have you back 'fair weather'. :wink:

Sorry 79, I was busying organising free lifts tickets for you and Synners at the Rialto.

The results on the weekend showed two things.

1. That teams do not tank

2. That teams do not want to finish last.

And that is good enough for me.

I would suggest that Collingwood is tanking. Would Didak and Tarrant have played if the Collingwood and Carlton game was for a spot in the 8? Would Rocca's and Frasers seasons been put on ice if Collingwood was pushing for the 8?

I thought the Hawks winning was the best evidence for the Tank yet. All of a sudden when they're getting the wooden spoon they can win a game.

I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ?

Author:	BlueMark [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:28 am ]
Post subject:	The Weekend Results
The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me.

Author:	Wojee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:40 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
BlueMark wrote: The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me. Collingwood disguised it pretty well. Buckley at full forward, then told by the runner not to leave the goalsquare when he singlehandedly kept them in the game. Now he's probably going to be "rested" so he doesn't screw up their plans with his competitive instinct.

Author:	Synbad [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:43 am ]
Post subject:
The results of the weekend showed that teams dont want to win the wooden spoon and that they want to have the extra early pick. Lets see how many games these clubs win now theyre all on the edge of the threshold.

Author:	Drewgirl [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:45 am ]
Post subject:
I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ?

Author:	Deano Supremo [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:58 am ]
Post subject:
Fevola wrote: I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ? Fine by me. I think Pagan might have a better idea than some bloke posting on a forum

TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

The Weekend Results http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4510	Page 1 of 1

Author:	79Vintage [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:08 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
BlueMark wrote: The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me. Missed your contributions last week after a loss, but it's good to have you back 'fair weather'.

Author:	buzzaaaah [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:11 am ]
Post subject:
Deano Supremo wrote: I think Pagan might have a better idea than some bloke posting on a forum Bite your tongue Deano. If anyone thinks that Collingwood wasnt out to lose, they should be following another sport

Author:	BlueMark [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
79Vintage wrote: BlueMark wrote: The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me. Missed your contributions last week after a loss, but it's good to have you back 'fair weather'. Sorry 79, I was busying organising free lifts tickets for you and Synners at the Rialto.

Author:	Ducks [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:16 am ]
Post subject:
buzzaaaah wrote: Deano Supremo wrote: I think Pagan might have a better idea than some bloke posting on a forum Bite your tongue Deano. If anyone thinks that Collingwood wasnt out to lose, they should be following another sport Exactly right!

Author:	79Vintage [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
BlueMark wrote: 79Vintage wrote: BlueMark wrote: The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me. Missed your contributions last week after a loss, but it's good to have you back 'fair weather'. Sorry 79, I was busying organising free lifts tickets for you and Synners at the Rialto. That's thoughtful, but I think I might walk the stairs. I watched Essendon* yesterday, think I may be visiting the Rialto for the first and last time.

Author:	jbee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:40 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
BlueMark wrote: The results on the weekend showed two things. 1. That teams do not tank 2. That teams do not want to finish last. And that is good enough for me. I would suggest that Collingwood is tanking. Would Didak and Tarrant have played if the Collingwood and Carlton game was for a spot in the 8? Would Rocca's and Frasers seasons been put on ice if Collingwood was pushing for the 8?

Author:	Wojee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:42 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Weekend Results
jbee wrote: I would suggest that Collingwood is tanking. Would Didak and Tarrant have played if the Collingwood and Carlton game was for a spot in the 8? Would Rocca's and Frasers seasons been put on ice if Collingwood was pushing for the 8? Anchoring Buckley to the goal square after 1/2 time, and stating that they're thinking of giving him a holiday for the next couple of weeks is the only evidence I need.

Author:	Drewgirl [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:55 am ]
Post subject:
I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ?

Author:	nightcrawler [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:01 am ]
Post subject:
I thought the Hawks winning was the best evidence for the Tank yet. All of a sudden when they're getting the wooden spoon they can win a game.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Wojee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:05 am ]
Post subject:
nightcrawler wrote: I thought the Hawks winning was the best evidence for the Tank yet. All of a sudden when they're getting the wooden spoon they can win a game. I prefer the Sheedy conspiracy theory. He's doing his best to deny Carlton a priority pick. Expect Hird and Lucas to be late withdrawals this week.

Author:	jbee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:07 am ]
Post subject:
Fevola wrote: I am not happy. How can we let Pagan know ? Any suggestions ? Does he realise what he is doing. The worst thing is that Murphy could be going to Collingwood. How is that everyone ? He will be at training on Wednesday. I suggest you interupt his press conference and raise this point. Good Luck.