Lets hope Pagan knows this and drops him to the Bullants for the next couple.
| TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| French = increased scoring? http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4539 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | verbs [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | French = increased scoring? |
Something had been nagging away at the back of my mind. We have had a much improved month. We have won two of the last four games. Not only that, our scoring rate has sky-rocketed in recent times. Suddenly we have a plethora of goal scorers. But coincidentally, or maybe not so, our improved form started with the return of French. Indeed, we didn't win a game without him. What's interesting however is Average score with French in the side: 99.85 Average score with French out of the side: 78.86 A staggering 21 points a game. A score of 78 is less than likely to win a game. Over the weekend I was talking to a former junior coach. He has coached the Voss boys, Keating, Hudghton, Aker when they were all little tackers. One thing he told me was, if you can get your team consistently scoring 100 points a game, you'll win many more than you lose. This year we have scored 100 points only once without French (117 in a loss to Freo). Overall this season: Scores over 100: 8 Wins: 3.5 = 44% winning record Scores under 100: 12 Wins 1 = 8% winning record Scores over 100 with French: 7 = 54% of games (ie every 2nd game) Scores over 100 without French: 1 = 14% of games (every 7th game) Might be a fluke, but it appears there is a degree of correlation between our good scores and the presence of Baranaby in the middle. |
|
| Author: | Blake [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
he is a very influential player when on the ground aint he He is also now helped in the ruck with Brian to let him have a rest. He doesnt have to Ruck most of the game now he only has to ruck a half and a bit |
|
| Author: | Mark [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lets hope Pagan knows this and drops him to the Bullants for the next couple.
|
|
| Author: | Wojee [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We do much better with Bananaby in the middle because our other ruck options are part timers at best. |
|
| Author: | GodisNavyBlue [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree Barney has made a difference but his return has also co-incided with Fish's return which meant we have also had a mcuh better structure up forward |
|
| Author: | Sydney Blue [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Is it Barney or is it the fact that we have a specailised ruckman actually giving our midfeilders first use of the ball. Most clubs carry two to three ruckman we have one and a couple of part timers. We did have two others that weren't bad but we traded them away. Makes you wonder doesn't it. |
|
| Author: | Bluebernz [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ever since I saw the Merovingian (sp?) and Monica Belucci on Matrix II and III, I've been convinced that: French = better scoring.
|
|
| Author: | TheGame [ Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You're right Sydneyblue the fact we only have one ruckman is a joke. French makes a huge difference just because he is the only one who doesn't get his pants pulled down in the ruck contests. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|