dannyboy wrote:
'Please dont go on and on with your ludicrous ramblings that pick 5 will be better than pick one and pick 3 or 4....' where have I said that! See synbad this is where you come across as a jerk. You stick words in people's mouths because the argument gets tough.
You cannot prove anything except that this is your opinion - you're entitled to it but have no idea what i think because you actually do not read anything anyone else says escept as an except to bleat your own stuff.
As for Ashman saying that good on him, he's a modest bloke but he would have played today without a doubt. Nick would have too, without a doubt if he wanted it (that bit we'll never know). In my opinion. Thats it. that's all we are tlaking here. opinions. Not facts. In almost everything.
I try to respect yours. Try and do the same with mine and stop trying to stick words or opinions in my mouth. It belittles you.
Thats belittling Dannyboy is when you talk utter crap and pretend you believe it.
If Ashman and Barrasi dont believe Nicholls could have played today he couldnt have even if you believe he could.
Syd Jackson said the same thing... but i have no witnesses to that one....
Yes it is my opinion only dannyboy .. that picks one and four will be better for the long term interests of this footy club than pick five alone...
And yes its your opion alone that says that pick five is better for Carlton than pick one and four or whatever we get....
But that just goes to prove what baloney you sprook.... but ill respect that you sprook baloney ok???
Just remember 20 years ago today we went out and took Kernahan Motley and Braddley (throw in Dora) the first 3 would have gone top 3 in a draft... and we won 2 premierships with them.....
and today we cant just go out and do the same thing but rely on the draft....!!!