3 or 4 future stars there I reckon.
| TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Carlton's 2005 Brownlow votes http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5395 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | BlueWorld [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Carlton's 2005 Brownlow votes |
Nick Stevens 11 Anthony Koutoufides 5 Jarrad Waite 5 Lance Whitnall 5 Adam Bentick 3 Andrew Carrazzo 2 Heath Scotland * 1 Brendan Fevola * 1 David Teague 1 |
|
| Author: | Jarusa [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
3 or 4 future stars there I reckon.
|
|
| Author: | BlueWorld [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Where was Campo?
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jets. |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jordan Russell was robbed! 
|
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
WELL DONE BOYS !!! ( yay carrots , bentick and waitey ) |
|
| Author: | Kaptain Kouta [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
How did our guys who got NRS nominations fare against others who did also, especially whoever it was who eventually won the NRS? |
|
| Author: | Jarusa [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Kaptain Kouta wrote: How did our guys who got NRS nominations fare against others who did also, especially whoever it was who eventually won the NRS?
Deledio got 2 brownlow votes very late in the year and that was all IIRC. |
|
| Author: | Rhys26 [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brownlow votes |
Anthony Koutoufides 5 - $1,000,000 Lance Whitnall 5 - $690,000 Campo 0 - $650,000 Total Votes 10 - Salary $2,340,000 Great return on Investment there from our leaders!! |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oi! Lance is only on 550k.... |
|
| Author: | George Harris [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
That's OK then - $110,000 per vote is perfectly acceptable. 
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Noone in that top 5 is getting more than our blokes... Thats my point!!! Cant they see what they have given to the club over years and what others have given to their clubs and compare salaries? mikkey.. the club will only fold is it continues to be a rabble to midladder club for a sustained period. People can see a plan if they go youth..and stick by the club... ... keeping them is not a long term plan and will be of more detriment to the club. |
|
| Author: | Kouta [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jarusa wrote: Kaptain Kouta wrote: How did our guys who got NRS nominations fare against others who did also, especially whoever it was who eventually won the NRS? Deledio got 2 brownlow votes very late in the year and that was all IIRC. Brock Mclean received 9 votes and Franklin and Griffen each received one vote. |
|
| Author: | mikkey [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Synbad wrote: Noone in that top 5 is getting more than our blokes...
Thats my point!!! Cant they see what they have given to the club over years and what others have given to their clubs and compare salaries? mikkey.. the club will only fold is it continues to be a rabble to midladder club for a sustained period. People can see a plan if they go youth..and stick by the club... ... keeping them is not a long term plan and will be of more detriment to the club. Who are those people? Members? Well many may stick with the club - but what about sponsors, corporates etc? Last season after a 16 and 15 finish we struggled to attract sponsors and corporates - this season after last years improvement (and more FTA and Friday games) it was much better. I doubt the club can afford to stay on the bottom for a number of years - simply could either fold or be at the mercy of the AFL - which again could lead to things like merger or relocation. I do agree with the re-building strategy, but the Board has to balance it with short term survival. And from what I can see we have not enough money to be "bold" short term - Hawthorn has a nice fat bank account from the Waverley sale - we don't. We have another substantial loss coming out of this year due to our poor performance on he field. |
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
mikkey wrote: Who are those people? Members? Well many may stick with the club - but what about sponsors, corporates etc? Last season after a 16 and 15 finish we struggled to attract sponsors and corporates - this season after last years improvement (and more FTA and Friday games) it was much better. I doubt the club can afford to stay on the bottom for a number of years - simply could either fold or be at the mercy of the AFL - which again could lead to things like merger or relocation.
I do agree with the re-building strategy, but the Board has to balance it with short term survival. And from what I can see we have not enough money to be "bold" short term - Hawthorn has a nice fat bank account from the Waverley sale - we don't. We have another substantial loss coming out of this year due to our poor performance on he field. Exactly.
|
|
| Author: | dannyboy [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
surry and synners have got a tron thing happening.... |
|
| Author: | Blue Vain [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
SurreyBlue wrote: mikkey wrote: Who are those people? Members? Well many may stick with the club - but what about sponsors, corporates etc? Last season after a 16 and 15 finish we struggled to attract sponsors and corporates - this season after last years improvement (and more FTA and Friday games) it was much better. I doubt the club can afford to stay on the bottom for a number of years - simply could either fold or be at the mercy of the AFL - which again could lead to things like merger or relocation. I do agree with the re-building strategy, but the Board has to balance it with short term survival. And from what I can see we have not enough money to be "bold" short term - Hawthorn has a nice fat bank account from the Waverley sale - we don't. We have another substantial loss coming out of this year due to our poor performance on he field. Exactly. Sponsors want to see a plan in place. A transparent rebuilding phase that will lead to future success. More of the same creates more of the same. Hawthorn were let off the hook beautifully this year. They underachieved more than Carlton did but they attracted no heat. Why is that? They are percieved as having a rebuilding structure in place. At a recent sponsors meeting, Michael Malouf got up and spruiked the benefits of drafting young talent. He mentioned Marc Murphy and told the sponsors how he was a great talent and hoped that Carlton could aquire him. He knows thats what they want to hear. THey're not interested in the club maintaining the status quo. People who succeed in business are often risk takers with an eye on future success. Thats the type of organisation they want to be involved with. This is the time to be courageous and hold our nerve. |
|
| Author: | dannyboy [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
now what did you call GWS
|
|
| Author: | Blue Vain [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Larry must have hacked my account. 
|
|
| Author: | Mrs Caz [ Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
AB  yay! Not bad for someone who the umpires didn't know his name.
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|