verbs wrote:
GWS wrote:
There's a big difference between having a crack at a youngster who's trying his guts out but not quite getting there and sticking it up a bunch of self-centred greedy little egomaniacs who don't give a F@%&#! about the club.
When it comes to the first type of whipping boys I find it distasteful and completely unnecessary.
When it comes to the second lot - hand me the crop.
Oh - and I shouldn't forget the third lot - supporters who "support" through thick and thin by deciding to wear blinkers when it comes to the motivation of their superheroes. I'mm happy to hold the crop for them too...

The problem with that is, as the years go by the youngsters become self-centred greedy egomaniacs. Back in 2000, no-one would've even contemplated Lappin would be in this position now, five years later. So you would prefer to have a team of 25 year olds and under, with no-one on more than $150,000? The business of footy doesn't work like that. So whilst you can complain about players being paid too much, that's all you can do as that's how the system works.
Bullshit.
When did Peter Dean, Bruce Doull, Andrew McKay, Michael Sexton, Ange Christou and any number of others who spent their careers putting the club first hold the club to ransom and allow their agents to manipulate the media to get themselves an extra few bucks whilst dragging the club through the mud?
Those guys are the benchmark and as far as I'm concerned any player who doesn't want to go that route can @#$%&! off.
If the youngsters are following the greedy egomaniacs down the same path then, as has been suggested by many, we obviously have a seriously destructive culture at the club.
Ask Akermanis how much he's been offered to play elsewhere not to mention how much he's forgone in marketing that he would have earned if he was a Melbourne based player. Why did he stay at the Lions? Because he put the interests of the club at least at the same level as his own interests.
That's what we need.