TalkingCarlton :: View topic - A tip for Fev, a tick for Lance ... but not Campo

"If he doesn't wake up to himself, he'll be 35-40 and he'll think 'What a mug I've been'," Pagan said.

Why the pies should pick him

He's good
It will piss off Essendon*.
It will stop supporters thinking about Heath Scotland and Nick Stevens playing for Carlton.
The Collingwood chicks will dig him.
They can afford him (Sheeds says they have stacks of cash).

"It's sad, I'd love to have him here . . .

Interesting how this article went mostly un-noticed...

Denis wrote:

"It's sad, I'd love to have him here . . .

Lucky it wasn't Kouta saying that..!

The Collingwood chicks will dig him...When you've got the likes of Licuria, Tarrant, Holland and Wakelin on the list, he wouldn't even get a look in.

Nice to hear the good news about Lappin.

But surely he could appear in your shampoo ads ADP.
Has'nt Lokan left a vacancy?

The Collingwood chicks will dig him...When you've got the likes of Licuria, Tarrant, Holland and Wakelin on the list, he wouldn't even get a look in.

"When Lance is really fit and sharp, I still think he's capable of playing forward. When he's not as fit as he can be, I think he's probably better suited down back because, as a forward, it's pretty hard to get off your opponent."

"He came third (in the best-and-fairest) this year; had a pretty good year, I reckon."

Author:	Effes [ Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:08 am ]
Post subject:	A tip for Fev, a tick for Lance ... but not Campo
A tip for Fev, a tick for Lance ... but not Campo Quote: "If he doesn't wake up to himself, he'll be 35-40 and he'll think 'What a mug I've been'," Pagan said.

Author:	Walker you gun!! [ Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:52 am ]
Post subject:
Sorry but i couldnt find a link to this. If you barrack for Collingwood or Essendon, the prospect of having someone at your club with ties to Carlton will probably make you feel violently ill. Fair enough too, as thats what the game is all about - emotion So, here are the pros and cons of adding Campo to your list. Why the pies should pick him He's good It will piss off Essendon. It will stop supporters thinking about Heath Scotland and Nick Stevens playing for Carlton. The Collingwood chicks will dig him. They can afford him (Sheeds says they have stacks of cash). Why they shouldn't He's from CARLTON! He decked Brodie Holland a couple of years ago. Commentators cant be exspected to say in a sentance: Iacobucci gets it to Prestigiacomo who kicks it long to Camporeale. He's a bit old and Bucks might not like him. He looks stupid in a Collingwood jumper (see page 96 of Wednesdays Herald Sun. He's from CARLTON! Why the dons should pick him up He's good. It will piss off Carlton and add to the rivalry. His hairdo will complement Lloyd's and Hird's. He'd look better in an Essendon* jumper. Why they shouldn't He's from CARLTON! He's expensive and ageing and Hirdy might feel like Bucks. His hair will constantly get messed up at Windy Hill training. Remember the Justin Murphy experiment? He's from CARLTON! Just let him go to Port or Freo, or somewhere no one gives a fig. By Grant Payne, Saturday 3/12/05 Herald Sun (pg 80)

Author:	killpies [ Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:17 am ]
Post subject:
Walker you gun!! wrote: Why the pies should pick him He's good It will piss off Essendon*. It will stop supporters thinking about Heath Scotland and Nick Stevens playing for Carlton. The Collingwood chicks will dig him. They can afford him (Sheeds says they have stacks of cash). You missed one: Cause Mandy really, really wants him at Collingwood.

Author:	bennyvtown [ Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:
Interesting how this article went mostly un-noticed... Denis wrote: "It's sad, I'd love to have him here . . . Lucky it wasn't Kouta saying that..!

Author:	Synbad [ Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:
bennyvtown wrote: Interesting how this article went mostly un-noticed... Denis wrote: "It's sad, I'd love to have him here . . . Lucky it wasn't Kouta saying that..! Yes nice grab .. but put it (the quote ) in its perspective. Pagan talks about being pissed on too.. do you think hes into watersports?

TalkingCarlton http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

A tip for Fev, a tick for Lance ... but not Campo http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7033	Page 1 of 1

Author:	ADP [ Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Walker you gun!! wrote: Why the pies should pick him He's good It will piss off Essendon. It will stop supporters thinking about Heath Scotland and Nick Stevens playing for Carlton. The Collingwood chicks will dig him. They can afford him (Sheeds says they have stacks of cash). He's good...perhaps. It will piss off Essendon...This is the only reason. It will stop supporters thinking about Heath Scotland and Nick Stevens playing for Carlton...Carlton fans don't even think about Scotland, why would we? The Collingwood chicks will dig him...When you've got the likes of Licuria, Tarrant, Holland and Wakelin on the list, he wouldn't even get a look in. They can afford him, (Stacks of cash)...and don't we know it... So on the basis of all that, by us drafting him it would achieve one thing - Pissing off Essendon*. And the Barry Mitchell fiasco must have taught us something... No to Campo.

Author:	Ponkstar [ Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:20 pm ]
Post subject:
ADP wrote: The Collingwood chicks will dig him...When you've got the likes of Licuria, Tarrant, Holland and Wakelin on the list, he wouldn't even get a look in. So yopu reckon some of those Collingwood boys are a bit of all right do ya ADP? Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

Author:	Blue Vain [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:24 am ]
Post subject:
But surely he could appear in your shampoo ads ADP. Has'nt Lokan left a vacancy?

Author:	Blue Bird [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:51 am ]
Post subject:
Pagan's comments on Campo are spot on but perhaps a coach has more leeway to say that than a team-mate. Nice to hear the good news about Lappin.

Author:	billc3 [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:23 am ]
Post subject:
Blue Bird wrote: Nice to hear the good news about Lappin. Most important bit of the article I reckon

Author:	ADP [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:
Blue Vain wrote: But surely he could appear in your shampoo ads ADP. Has'nt Lokan left a vacancy? He could have stayed and appeared in that beauty salon ad with Fev.

Author:	CK95 [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:
ADP wrote: The Collingwood chicks will dig him...When you've got the likes of Licuria, Tarrant, Holland and Wakelin on the list, he wouldn't even get a look in. Touchy subject?

Author:	camel [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:
Aren't Holland and Wankelin the same person â€¦ oh sorry, Wakelin, my mistake. :p

Author:	camel [ Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:23 pm ]
Post subject:
Back on topic now, can someone with a better memory than me tell me roughly what percentage of the year Lance played in the backline? Quote: "When Lance is really fit and sharp, I still think he's capable of playing forward. When he's not as fit as he can be, I think he's probably better suited down back because, as a forward, it's pretty hard to get off your opponent." I would have thought it was a fair portion of the year, which makes the previous comment from Denis intersting in light of what he had earlier stated: Quote: "He came third (in the best-and-fairest) this year; had a pretty good year, I reckon."

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/