TalkingCarlton
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Negatives from West Coast Game
http://talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8735		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  Jarusa [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:32 am ]
Post subject:  Negatives from West Coast Game
All you pricks can congregate in this thread this week. :lol: :wink:





Author:  mjonc [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Negatives from West Coast Game
Jarusa wrote:
All you pricks can congregate in this thread this week. :lol: :wink:


I'll start. How did Lynch kick 2 goals? Whoever played on him should be dropped :lol:

On a serious note, the shithouse media coverage on a win for the club.

Who the hell is Andrew Aloia at the Herald Sun? At least the heading was Ok "Blues outclass Eagles".

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 42,00.html
Author:  Bookie [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:04 am ]
Post subject: 
To quote the Sportal article "Minus their top stars, Chris Judd, Ben Cousins, Dean Cox, Daniel Kerr, Daniel Chick, Andrew Embley and David Wirrpanda" The Panda is not as good as Wirrpunda however :?
Author:  verbs [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Negatives from West Coast Game
mjonc wrote:
I'll start. How did Lynch kick 2 goals? Whoever played on him should be dropped :lol:


:lol: :lol: You idiot!
Author:  jimmae [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:42 am ]
Post subject: 
Negatives?

Still allowing some easy f50 entries from a significantly poorer team.

They probably should have been close to grabbing everything coming their way in the forward line, how did that go? Would have been an excellent time to practise some forward setups.

Aside from that we showed we still had plenty in the tank to burn off the Eagles 2nds (I really wish it wasn't, but it pretty much was). The good thing about play such an undermanned side is that it shows that we don't have an issue so much with pace as we do structure and cohesiveness as a unit, because I doubt the young eagles would have been any less speedy than their best 22.

Having said that it sounds like we were in control of the match from start to finish, without having to push too hard in terms of effort or intensity. My only hope is that they know how to push for and maintain those higher levels in the season proper.

One other thing - the full flood tactic, can we really sustain that in the season proper? I'm not worried about getting burnt on the rebound from a turnover because our numbers will still be back, I'm worried about our ability to consistently find an option on the rush forward, and what it could do to our players late in the season, especially with the rule change. It could result in being an ineffective game plan on account of team endurance.

Aside from that - Go Blues :)
Author:  Deano Supremo [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:03 am ]
Post subject: 
Negative - didn't get to watch it!
Author:  jimmae [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:04 am ]
Post subject: 
Deano Supremo wrote:
Negative - didn't get to watch it!

That too :P
Author:  Warby [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:45 am ]
Post subject: 
I'd like to see the pics when the negatives are developed.... 8)
Author:  Ponkstar [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:32 am ]
Post subject: 
Negatives:

For the past three weeks (including today) we have been making WAY too much out of pre-season form.
Author:  Kaptain Kouta [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
Ponkstar wrote:
Negatives:

For the past three weeks (including today) we have been making WAY too much out of pre-season form.


Hear, hear.

Also, I didn't get to watch/listen. I wanted to soak up the strains of "Lily" at the final siren.
Author:  Stefchook [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:48 pm ]
Post subject: 
jimmae wrote:
One other thing - the full flood tactic, can we really sustain that in the season proper?


I don't think we'll be the only team doing it. Basically everyone does it these days. Some teams do it more, and I doubt we'd be at the worst end of the scale.

I'm with Gerard Healy on this one. If they really want to defeat the flood, then they need to reduce the interchange bench, and so reduce the running power of teams. (It's usually even worse in the pre-season with the extra interchange players, and early in the season when fitness is at its peak.)
Author:  Electric Blue [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
i have ions for sale....hmmm..
Author:  Bustling Bentick [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 5:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
I heard Murph had some Bandaging around his thigh, Was that just to ice it up due to heat and still being up to a whole game or is it some more serious we should worry about??

Positives:

We Beat West Coast In the Pre-Season AGAIN.
Fev Was a great big strong target who presented and Booted 5.
Fisher is becoming a star in his own Right
No Whitnall, Kouta, Barnaby or Saddo

Negatives:

Probably The LEAST important game all season!!!


Good work Blueboys.
Author:  lucablue [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 7:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
What? - No post from Synbad yet??? :? :? :? :?
Author:  BlueWorld [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
lucablue wrote:
What? - No post from Synbad yet??? :? :? :? :?


Lance & Kouta didn't play!
Author:  SHHH! [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
My turn
They had plenty out that would turn the game around into something scary.

We had guys out but the reality is that their missing vs our misdsing should've given us a huge advantage not just 3 goals.
Author:  1AW [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
Is there any news on Murphs injury??
Author:  Mrs Caz [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
No news....just a corky?
Author:  BlueWorld [ Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
lucablue wrote:
What? - No post from Synbad yet??? :? :? :? :?


SHHH! didn't let us down! :roll:
Author:  Kouta [ Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
No photos of Bower's mark.

If we were the Mandys there would have been a decent media contingent there to catch it.
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/