Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 5:24 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 ... 93  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:43 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
DocSherrin wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Port also have higher overheads during the season, with more than double the interstate trips Melbourne clubs have to do.


Not an overhead...


I am not an accountant, so I dont know the appropriate balance sheet category.

But I do know its an extra financial burden, unless the afl compensates interstate clubs for the extra travel (???)

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1238
Afl subsidies all travel costs

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17236
Cretylus wrote:

But I do know its an extra financial burden, unless the afl compensates interstate clubs for the extra travel (???)


Not a financial burden.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Cretylus wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Port also have higher overheads during the season, with more than double the interstate trips Melbourne clubs have to do.


Not an overhead...


I am not an accountant, so I dont know the appropriate balance sheet category.


:lol:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:31 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2143
Cretylus wrote:
....if it was due to football department budgets OR club revenue, then the blues should be miles ahead of Port. (Blues revenue last financial year was 57 million compared to Ports 41 million, and the footy department budgets also favour the Blues 21 million to 14 million).

Port also have higher overheads during the season, with more than double the interstate trips Melbourne clubs have to do.

There are two areas where Port are clearly in front of the Blues

1. winning games
2. Membership (55,000 to our 48,000 odd)


So basically it seems like we agree. The AFL "investment" in Port Adelaide is no longer needed then. Carlton is not needed to fund their development any more. Objective achieved. Port have bigger membership, bigger crowds & are a bigger and better club. I agree that that objective has been achieved.



Port Adelaide are wealthy and strong enough now not to need AFL financial assistance year after year. You seem to agree that the funding should stop now.


What is pleasing is that there were plenty of grants and funding etc for the Adelaide Oval move, Isn't that "good for the game"***? meanwhile watch Carlton get roasted next year in the MCG/Etithad deal.

On an aside, football department spending. Port spent 16.3 million in 2013, Carlton just over 20 million. It isn't a massive difference and the AFL has done all possible to make sure Port gets ahead.


*** the only thing that I think is "good for the game" is Carlton winning. It seems clear that people in AFL House have a different opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:50 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:35 am
Posts: 533
Location: Carlton
List Management?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I think if we are searching for reasons like financial help the AFL has given to North and Port to justify our current lowly position, we are never going to go anywhere. How about asking how we managed to go from the greatest club, the best off field and on field to the mediocrity we have become? Totally from our own bad decisions. Failure to understand drafting. It has been in for almost 30 years and we are still close to the worst club at it. Not understanding the importance of supporters, taking them for granted and losing membership. Lack of young supporters. Shocking financial decisions. Forget whinging about what Port gets from the AFL. The Hawks were going to become Melbourne 15 years or so ago. Now they are the AFL powerhouse. What are we doing about getting to there? Port are certainly way ahead of us as a club and so are more than half the league. Lets learn from those doing better, and think of our own ideas instead of trying to copy others. Lets become great again by being smarter, not the moribund old dinosaur we have been. Be patient, draft really well, develop players, connect with supporters. Our long term future is at stake. If we are ordinary for long enough we will never get out of it. The time is now for a genuine detailed five year plan with substance across the whole club that will make us successful again. For 15 years now we seem to have been rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.


Last edited by gerry atric on Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
If any post needs a round of applause this is it.

:wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
AGRO wrote:
If any post needs a round of applause this is it.

:wink:


+1

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:28 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
DocSherrin wrote:
Cretylus wrote:

But I do know its an extra financial burden, unless the afl compensates interstate clubs for the extra travel (???)


Not a financial burden.


i give up then Doc

Where is it found on the Balance Sheet

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:36 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
tap in 79 wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
....if it was due to football department budgets OR club revenue, then the blues should be miles ahead of Port. (Blues revenue last financial year was 57 million compared to Ports 41 million, and the footy department budgets also favour the Blues 21 million to 14 million).

Port also have higher overheads during the season, with more than double the interstate trips Melbourne clubs have to do.

There are two areas where Port are clearly in front of the Blues

1. winning games
2. Membership (55,000 to our 48,000 odd)




*** the only thing that I think is "good for the game" is Carlton winning. It seems clear that people in AFL House have a different opinion.


we know that the AFL doesnt even want a fair competition. Everything it does is orchestrated and pre planned. Its about market share, expansionism and corporate greed (even though the AFL calle itself a non-for profit organsiation - lol - a charity like the Catholic Church or Care Australia

the AFL even tries to sweep team doping scandals under the rug.

But OUR poor performance as a club over the past decade rests at our feet.
thats part of the problem - blaming outside factors.

We will never move forward if we continue to do that

The Hawks and the Cats have adapted as well as the Pies

The Kangaroos do as well as can be expected for the resources they have.

The Blues??

what are we going to do if Mick doesnt fire the team up early int he 2015 season?

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Last edited by Cretylus on Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:40 am, edited 4 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Cretylus wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Cretylus wrote:

But I do know its an extra financial burden, unless the afl compensates interstate clubs for the extra travel (???)


Not a financial burden.


i give up then Doc

Where is it found on the Balance Sheet


Travel is an expense and therefore appears in a Profit & Loss statement not a Balance Sheet.
Two things may happen;
AFL gets billed directly for the travel and pay for it or the travelling club gets billed, pays for it and then gets reimbursed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:42 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
woof wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Cretylus wrote:

But I do know its an extra financial burden, unless the afl compensates interstate clubs for the extra travel (???)


Not a financial burden.


i give up then Doc

Where is it found on the Balance Sheet


Travel is an expense and therefore appears in a Profit & Loss statement not a Balance Sheet.
Two things may happen;
AFL gets billed directly for the travel and pay for it or the travelling club gets billed, pays for it and then gets reimbursed.


I see...

So a company's balance sheet doesnt list the expenses and revenues etc for any given financial year.

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
gerry atric wrote:
I think if we are searching for reasons like financial help the AFL has given to North and Port to justify our current lowly position, we are never going to go anywhere. How about asking how we managed to go from the greatest club, the best off field and on field to the mediocrity we have become? Totally from our own bad decisions. Failure to understand drafting. It has been in for almost 30 years and we are still close to the worst club at it. Not understanding the importance of supporters, taking them for granted and losing membership. Lack of young supporters. Shocking financial decisions. Forget whinging about what Port gets from the AFL. The Hawks were going to become Melbourne 15 years or so ago. Now they are the AFL powerhouse. What are we doing about getting to there? Port are certainly way ahead of us as a club and so are more than half the league. Lets learn from those doing better, and think of our own ideas instead of trying to copy others. Lets become great again by being smarter, not the moribund old dinosaur we have been. Be patient, draft really well, develop players, connect with supporters. Our long term future is at stake. If we are ordinary for long enough we will never get out of it. The time is now for a genuine detailed five year plan with substance across the whole club that will make us successful again. For 15 years now we seem to have been rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.


Great post!

One thing that has caught my eye is that all the teams with biggest memberships 50k+ (Pies, Adelaide, Port, WCE, Haw, Ess, Rich) have one of 2 things in common.

They have one team town status (Adelaide, WCE) or the have huge media representation, i.e Eddie, Kochie and Kennett* as Presidents or Watson, Robbo, Bartlett, Molloy etc

I think that we may be giving too much credit to the administrations of these clubs and we need to also focus our efforts in utilising the carlton supporters in media to help push the message.

Think about it as the speed kills campaign, statistics show that the reduction in road toll doesn't reflect the message, yet if you repeat the message often enough people buy into it.

So the question is how to we tap into our media personalities to take an active role in promoting the club which grows their popularity which in turn will grow ours?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
No one is disputing the off field administration has been the worst of all AFL clubs over the last 15 or so years.

How does this justify pitching into Port's coffers? Stuff them l say.

Can't recall any clubs coming to our rescue when we were down & out financially only a decade ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Our financial state was our own doing. Went from being a rich club to a broke club by our own hand (depending who you believe about the long term plans for stadiums in victoria) and salary cap cheating.

Thats why we received a loan instead of a handout.

Still trading ok of our own accord, paying 100% of the salary cap and working down our debt.

Port, North, Melbourne etc. wont survive without assistance. Let them go broke, we have a 12 team competition, 1 team in Adelaide and NSW/QLD are stuffed, along with TV rights.

Not difficult to understand.

Doesnt give Port an advantage, it allows them to compete.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..a league ought to be impartial, if a team would fold, it folds.. ..happens in every sport..

:.Fitzroy must have been part of the axis of evil I guess..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:16 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..a league ought to be impartial, if a team would fold, it folds.. ..happens in every sport..

:.Fitzroy must have been part of the axis of evil I guess..

Didn't fold, changed its name to Brisbane and won three premierships. :smile:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..a league ought to be impartial, if a team would fold, it folds.. ..happens in every sport..

:.Fitzroy must have been part of the axis of evil I guess..


Its not about being impartial.

How do you get $1b in TV rights playing 6 games a week in 2 states, and a game every other week in a 3rd state? Leaving out the biggest tv market in the country?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..a league ought to be impartial, if a team would fold, it folds.. ..happens in every sport..

:.Fitzroy must have been part of the axis of evil I guess..

Didn't fold, changed its name to Brisbane and won three premierships. :smile:


..yep, and lost ten? in the process.... ..don't think I'd follow brissie if I we're a royboy..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 ... 93  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group